Rockmolder
16 years ago

http://www.jsonline.com/sports/packers/35519619.html

Green Bay - The Green Bay Packers' season might have been on the line Sunday when they broke the huddle with 3 minutes 45 seconds to go against the Carolina Panthers.

Tie game at 28-28.

First and goal at the Carolina 7-yard line.

A field goal wouldn't cut it. Not with the Packers' special teams and defense combining to surrender 79 points in the last seven-plus quarters.

Nothing short of a touchdown would make anyone feel safe.

After two runs, the ball was on the 1-yard line. Coach Mike McCarthy had two options: Put the ball in the hands of Aaron Rodgers, who had completed 12 straight passes for 128 yards and a touchdown and could make a play with his feet. He led all National Football League quarterbacks with four rushing touchdowns.

Or run the ball again, perhaps with fullback John Kuhn, who had converted all four of his third-and-1 carries to that point and had scored from 1 yard out against the New Orleans Saints.

With the season in the balance, McCarthy decided to hand the ball to Kuhn. He was stopped for no gain and the Packers settled for a field goal that ultimately proved not enough.

From the outside looking in, McCarthy's choice of play-calling suggested that in crunch time, McCarthy does not have ultimate confidence in Rodgers, his first-year starter. McCarthy's revelation on Monday that if he had gone for it on fourth down - something he considered - he would have called another running play seemed to support the notion that Rodgers might not have McCarthy's complete confidence.

On Wednesday, McCarthy revised the possible fourth-down play call. He said the play likely would have been a run-play option for Rodgers, depending on the defense.

But the point remained. McCarthy quickly tossed it aside.

"I don't think that's accurate. I don't think that's fair," McCarthy said. "I mean, look at the play calls . . . look at the two plays called before the first down. One of them was a shock play where we're attacking the end zone. They played coverage and he rolled out of the pocket and scrambled and (Julius) Peppers hit him so we got a first down on that.

"If you go and watch the film and you call my play-calling conservative, I wouldn't agree with that. I mean, we pushed the ball down the field. We're not a conservative offense so I don't even know why we're talking about it. The quarterback threw the ball 45 times in the game. I don't have confidence (in Rodgers)?"

McCarthy said he still didn't have any regrets about the call.

"There's a lot that goes into that decision," he said. "I did not go home kicking myself. Well, I actually stayed and went upstairs and watched it after the game was over because I can't sleep anyways. And when I saw their defense . . . and I saw the film, I'm still comfortable with the call."

McCarthy pointed out that the Panthers' two linebackers were lined up to defend the pass, some 5 yards from the line of scrimmage.

"How many passes do you have (in the playbook) from the 1?" McCarthy said. "I mean, you're better off throwing from the 5. You've got 11 yards (to pass the ball from the 1). From the 1 yard line, what are your options? Spread them out. OK. And what are they going to do? They're either going to go empty or coverage. If they go empty, now you're throwing a fly to who? One of your receivers on their defensive backs. Do you like the matchup? I mean, these are all the things . . . that's what we sit up there all (Saturday) night talking about. There were other options but there was really nothing."

Rodgers, who did not lobby for a pass in the sequence, said he had no doubt McCarthy believes in him in the tightest of spots.

"The way he called that last drive, I think, proves it," said Rodgers, whose 106.8 passer rating on third down is the league's third-best mark behind Drew Brees and Tony Romo, and has the most third-down touchdown passes (11)."Obviously I'd love to have the ball in my hands but I like all three of the calls. I do. I think everybody did."

So McCarthy and Rodgers both insist there is no dearth of confidence. But surely if Brett Favre was still at quarterback, there's little chance McCarthy would not allow him to make a play at a crucial point in the season.

"That had nothing to do with it. Absolutely not," McCarthy said. "(Favre) wants to throw the ball every time you get to goal-line offense because he feels he has all 22 guys compacted in and there's a reason for that.

"Aaron makes all the decisions that Favre ever made here and frankly we've even gone further. You could make the argument (Rodgers) does more."

The statistics back McCarthy.

Favre in 2007 passed more often in goal-to-go plays than Rodgers has this season - 54% to 43.4% - but McCarthy has relied on Rodgers more in the most crucial of circumstances. On third downs in goal-to-go plays, Rodgers has passed on nine of 10 plays. Favre was asked to pass on just four of seven.

That one time Rodgers was not asked to throw on third down? That was on Sunday when Kuhn got the carry.

"I don't hold back from Aaron," McCarthy said.



Always nice to see that he does indeed trust Rodgers.

The play-calling on the goalline seemed someone questionable to me aswell, but I guess Kuhn was on a hot-streak on short yardage.

I still think Rodgers should've gotten it though... but it's easy talking now.
Zero2Cool
16 years ago
Prick, I was going to post this but my daughter took me away from the keyboard! 😛
UserPostedImage
Rockmolder
16 years ago
Haha, just saw it while looking around NFL.com.

Feels good to actually post an article before you find it. 😛
bozz_2006
16 years ago
settle down girls.
UserPostedImage
doddpower
16 years ago
Most the people around me at the game were saying "Kick it, kick it!" However, I was saying, "go for it! If we kick it, it'll be one long bomb to Steve Smith and we'll lose."

Perhaps I jinxed the team, but sure enough that's what happened.

Regardless of McCarthy's confidence in Rodger's, we should have gotten that ball in the end zone in 1-2 tries. Let alone three. That's a part of the green bay packers lately that I do not like. It seems we've improved a bit, but when you need one yard, we HAVE to be able to get it. We just simply get overpowered.

Gaaah, so frustrating!!
16 years ago
I'm not sure how many times i said this but i think the team missed grants presences on the goal line.
UserPostedImage
IronMan
16 years ago

Most the people around me at the game were saying "Kick it, kick it!" However, I was saying, "go for it! If we kick it, it'll be one long bomb to Steve Smith and we'll lose."

Perhaps I jinxed the team, but sure enough that's what happened.

"doddpower" wrote:


Damn you!
millertime
16 years ago

I'm not sure how many times i said this but i think the team missed grants presences on the goal line.

"cheeseheads123" wrote:



since hes been so effective there this season....

wait! he hasn't

i'm pretty sure rodgers has more rushing TDs than grant. not good.
16 years ago

I'm not sure how many times i said this but i think the team missed grants presences on the goal line.

"millertime" wrote:



since hes been so effective there this season....

wait! he hasn't

i'm pretty sure rodgers has more rushing TDs than grant. not good.

"cheeseheads123" wrote:

Lately he has been.
UserPostedImage
Rockmolder
16 years ago

I'm not sure how many times i said this but i think the team missed grants presences on the goal line.

"millertime" wrote:



since hes been so effective there this season....

wait! he hasn't

i'm pretty sure rodgers has more rushing TDs than grant. not good.

"cheeseheads123" wrote:



He hasn't been great, but in short-yardage situations he always seems to burst through for at least 2 yards or so.

Excactly what we need there... and what Jackson and Kuhn couldn't give us there.

I would've gone Jackson on 1st, 2nd Kuhn or a Draw play and 3rd let Rodgers throw it... 4th, IDK, I for one did not mind the 3 points there.

Our defense should've been able to stop the pass... especially since they where playing Delhomme. Yes, he had a good day, but he's not that much better than average... he even threw 4 picks against the Raiders.
Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (2h) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (4h) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (14h) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (14h) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (14h) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (14h) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (14h) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (18h) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (18h) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (18h) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (20h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (20h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (20h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (20h) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (20h) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (20h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (20h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (20h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (21h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (22h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (22h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (22h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (22h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (22h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
8m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

10m / Random Babble / beast

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

9h / GameDay Threads / Mucky Tundra

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.