Pack93z
  • Pack93z
  • Select Member Topic Starter
16 years ago



haha i tried my best to turn it into a Holy War.. and it didnt ever get there. sign that the fans are getting better ... [strike]or just that this site has good moderation?[/strike]

"Packnic" wrote:



It is starting to show that people are focusing more on today's team than yesterdays.. even though we dregged up the past several times in the string.. more so, we were looking tangibly at the team and situations themselves...

I want to seriously see where we are at as far as a fan base and forum.. so I had to play a role a bit different.

Gives me hope.

The holy war part.. I thought it was just you and I that were going to go at it.. lol.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
dingus
16 years ago
I too was happy to see how even-keeled this thread was (even though I took a shot at #4)

I really like what we have going forward with our new QB. Will he come up with the game winning drive this season, he's gonna have to if we are to win out.

If we were to make it to the playoffs I don't see some miracle finish like the 07 Giants and if they were to get there and be one and done I wouldn't be terribly shocked (same goes for any of the North teams, Williams Wall or not).

I've already resigned myself to the fact that this is a learning year for Rodgers, pure and simple. But I've also come away from this season (so far) with a respect for Aaron that was what I was hoping for. He handled himself well during the circus of an off season, He battled through a painful injury to his throwing arm and kept us in some games that we had no business being in.

The future looks bright!

(now if Ted Thompson just gets us a couple good FA's on the O and D lines!)
blank
Roddyboy
16 years ago
Rodgers sucks...

No Tedford project ever made it in the NFL...
Ted Thompson must go!
blank
Rios39
16 years ago
kk Roddyboy should be banned. For sure the guy is a troll.

2nd. Rodgers can only do so much. It's one thing to give us the lead, but we are also asking him to score on every possession. Favre wasn't such a clutch performer in 04 or 05 or 06 when he had to face the same issues.
blank
RedSoxExcel
16 years ago



It's simple, he's had 4 chances, and he didn't come through in any of them. IF he gets even two of those, we're 7-5 and in the lead for the division. Your missing the whole point because of your blind hatred for Favre. Why the obsession with Favre? What does that have to do with anything?

"longtimefan" wrote:




one chance was not met by his kicker...If his kicker did what Brett Favre kicker did that would be a 6-6 record right now..


before I am blasted...


He could have done more, but he did just enough for the Pack to win...

scoring over 28 points 2 weeks in a row and the Pack lose? Thats not his fault

"RedSoxExcel" wrote:



LTfan, you and I will never see eye to eye on anything, so there is no point. But I really don't get why everytime anyone says anytime anything negative is said about Rodgers it turns into a defense of "he's not the reason we lost".

That isn't what I'm saying. That Rodgers is the sole reason we lost. Thats the fundamental problem. Everytime anyone says "Rodgers threw a bad INT". Response = "He wasn't the reason we lost! It's the defense!".

Thats not what I'm saying. All I'm saying is that its his first season as a starter, thus far IMO he hasn't come through. It will come in time I assume. Thats my opinion and I'm sure a lot of people have that opinion.

And yes call me bias or whatever you want. 34 yarder v. 52 yarder, I think there is a difference. But I still don't understand why Favre was even brought up here in the first place. He has nothing to do with anything. So what some people think that Rodgers hasn't done well in some close games, why does it affect people so much.

No one is blaming this season on Rodgers but he its his first year, relax, it will probably come with time.
blank
longtimefan
16 years ago



#2 I'm not going to go back in history but I'll just go back back two weeks ago. Favre leads Jets to TD. Pats tie it. Favre leads the Jets to a game winning FG in OT.

"longtimefan" wrote:



So we have a q/b that puts the kicker in a spot to make a fg and kicker fails, so its all on Aaron Rodgers?? (** please do not bring crap about Aaron Rodgers didnt get them closer**)

Brett Favre gets his kicker for a chance to make a fg, kicker makes it and its all Brett Favre??

Perfect example of double standard

"RedSoxExcel" wrote:



Lot of people gave BF credit for this win 


(9:39) 2-M.Crosby 53 yard field goal is GOOD
Greg C.
16 years ago
Rodgers has faltered a few times at the end of games, but I have little doubt that he will begin notching up some last-minute victories, probably sooner rather than later. I remember Favre going through some fairly long droughts where he did not have any fourth quarter comeback wins. As I recall, those droughts occurred when the defense and special teams were lousy. Coincidence? I think not.

By the way, it's "brass tacks," not "brass tacts." I hate to be the language police, but I couldn't let that one go.
blank
RedSoxExcel
16 years ago



#2 I'm not going to go back in history but I'll just go back back two weeks ago. Favre leads Jets to TD. Pats tie it. Favre leads the Jets to a game winning FG in OT.

"longtimefan" wrote:



So we have a q/b that puts the kicker in a spot to make a fg and kicker fails, so its all on Aaron Rodgers?? (** please do not bring crap about Aaron Rodgers didnt get them closer**)

Brett Favre gets his kicker for a chance to make a fg, kicker makes it and its all Brett Favre??

Perfect example of double standard

"longtimefan" wrote:



Lot of people gave Brett Favre credit for this win 


(9:39) 2-M.Crosby 53 yard field goal is GOOD

"RedSoxExcel" wrote:



What are you talking about? Seriously, I don't understand what that Eagles game has to do with anything. I was talking about the Pats game. And yes I think Favre was a big reason that the Jets beat the Pats that game which is why I brought it up.

If you think getting the ball at like 43 and then moving the team into a 52 yard FG is clutch, your nuts. Yeah you can say the playcalling or whatever, thats a valid point. But to bring that up as somekind of proof of anything, I'm not buying it, sorry. I think your grasping at straws.

Once again, its not a big deal, its his first year as a starter, it will probably come with time and experience. He has some problems at this point in his career, its normal, just admit them.
blank
longtimefan
16 years ago



#2 I'm not going to go back in history but I'll just go back back two weeks ago. Favre leads Jets to TD. Pats tie it. Favre leads the Jets to a game winning FG in OT.

"RedSoxExcel" wrote:



So we have a q/b that puts the kicker in a spot to make a fg and kicker fails, so its all on Aaron Rodgers?? (** please do not bring crap about Aaron Rodgers didnt get them closer**)

Brett Favre gets his kicker for a chance to make a fg, kicker makes it and its all Brett Favre??

Perfect example of double standard

"longtimefan" wrote:



Lot of people gave Brett Favre credit for this win 


(9:39) 2-M.Crosby 53 yard field goal is GOOD

"longtimefan" wrote:



What are you talking about? Seriously, I don't understand what that Eagles game has to do with anything. I was talking about the Pats game. And yes I think Favre was a big reason that the Jets beat the Pats that game which is why I brought it up.

If you think getting the ball at like 43 and then moving the team into a 52 yard FG is clutch, your nuts. Yeah you can say the playcalling or whatever, thats a valid point. But to bring that up as somekind of proof of anything, I'm not buying it, sorry. I think your grasping at straws.

Once again, its not a big deal, its his first year as a starter, it will probably come with time and experience. He has some problems at this point in his career, its normal, just admit them.

"RedSoxExcel" wrote:



Philly game Mason kicks a 53 yard FG and Pack win

We see here and other places where people say Brett got them to 14-4..That would include the Philly game right?

so why does Brett get credit for a win vs Philly last year, cuz his kicker made a 53 yrd fg..

Then when Mason misses a 53 yarder that has the team lose, we are told Aaron Rodgers didn't get them close enuff...

you know damn well if Mason misses that 53 yard vs Philly..No one would say Brett didn't put them on his back to get the win..

Double standard..


I am not arguing that Aaron Rodgers has done perfect..I think he still has to prove to me he can will this team to win...

But dont pass off a made 53 yard fg that ends up haing the Pack win and say Brett got that win...and in same breath say Aaron Rodgers didnt get us close enuff so Mason had a better shot
Pack93z
  • Pack93z
  • Select Member Topic Starter
16 years ago


By the way, it's "brass tacks," not "brass tacts." I hate to be the language police, but I couldn't let that one go.

"Greg C." wrote:



I have been busted.. wondered when that was coming.. :lol:

Greg LP.. we need a screen name change. 😉
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Fan Shout
beast (35m) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (36m) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (38m) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (4h) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
beast (5h) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
beast (5h) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
wpr (7h) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
wpr (7h) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
wpr (7h) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
Zero2Cool (9h) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
Martha Careful (11h) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
Mucky Tundra (17h) : FG to make it academic
Mucky Tundra (18h) : and there's the dagger
Mucky Tundra (18h) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
Mucky Tundra (18h) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
Mucky Tundra (18h) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
Mucky Tundra (18h) : Game not over yet
beast (19h) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury
beast (19h) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State
beast (19h) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State
Mucky Tundra (19h) : Notre Lame getting rolled
Martha Careful (20h) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Oh snap!!!
Zero2Cool (21h) : Even Stevie Wonder can see that.
Zero2Cool (21h) : Nah, you see Lions OC leaving to be HC of Bears is directly related to Packers.
Mucky Tundra (21h) : ohhhhhhh Zero is in TROUBLE
packerfanoutwest (21h) : Zero, per your orders, check Bearshome, not packershome
Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : Then he'll land with another team and flourish.
Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : Ben going to Bears. He'll be out in 3 years.
Mucky Tundra (20-Jan) : what's so funny?
Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : Bears are finalizing a deal to hire Ben Johnson as their head coach. (via @tompelissero )
Mucky Tundra (20-Jan) : Looks like Lions OC Ben Johnson is going to be the Bears coach
Mucky Tundra (20-Jan) : TD but another failed 2 pt conversion!
Mucky Tundra (20-Jan) : Ravens still alive, but barely
Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : Or not...BUT THAT CATCH BY NACUA
Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : WE MAY HAVE BEEN PREMATURE KANATA
TheKanataThrilla (19-Jan) : Time to make dinner
TheKanataThrilla (19-Jan) : Ouch!!!! Dagger for the Eagles
Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : DAGGER
TheKanataThrilla (19-Jan) : pass plays
TheKanataThrilla (19-Jan) : Seems some of their passes are too deep. Reminds me of MLF as well.
Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : Oren Burks with a clutch pass break up...I will now light myself on fire
Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : a run on 2nd down and 17 from McVay? So that's where MLF gets it from!
Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : Do or die time for the Rams
TheKanataThrilla (19-Jan) : Kicking field goals are impressive
Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : Oh that might be a backbreaker
Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : That's what I thought too, just wasn't sure
TheKanataThrilla (19-Jan) : Kicking doesn't make much sense
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Random Babble / packerfanoutwest

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.