If you think getting the ball at like 43 and then moving the team into a 52 yard FG is clutch, your nuts. Yeah you can say the playcalling or whatever, thats a valid point. But to bring that up as somekind of proof of anything, I'm not buying it, sorry. I think your grasping at straws.
Once again, its not a big deal, its his first year as a starter, it will probably come with time and experience. He has some problems at this point in his career, its normal, just admit them.
"RedSoxExcel" wrote:
"longtimefan" wrote:
I admitted them!! you just do not read my entire posts....
Aaron Rodgers has not proven to me that he can will this team to win yet..There were games he did enough to win and some games he needed to do just more...
Show me where I said it was clutch?? Those are your words pal, not mine.
What I said was he got them in fg range..and the kicker missed it..
And dont give me shit that he didnt move them any closer, cuz Brett didnt in the Philly game and the kicker made it..
"mi_keys" wrote:
If you never said anything about clutch, where did I say that Brett "won" us hte Philly game.
I don't think ANY player wins a game in a team game like football. But yes, I think certain players give you a better chance to win than other players. I.e. I don't think Brady "won" 16 games for the Pats last year but he certainly gives you a better chance to win than Cassel.
Which is what you seem to agree with from your sig, so I don't evne know what we're arguing about. Favre didn't "win" the Eagles game just like he didn't "win" any other game. And just like Rodgers didn't "lose" us any games but he hasn't shown that "it" yet, which is what this thread was orginally about.
"RedSoxExcel" wrote: