TheKanataThrilla
13 years ago
You can't build a dome team to play at Lambeau and that is what we are starting to feel like.
nerdmann
13 years ago

You can't build a dome team to play at Lambeau and that is what we are starting to feel like.

Originally Posted by: TheKanataThrilla 


We're starting to feel like a team that never shows up for 60, and on this past Sunday, didn't show up at all.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Nonstopdrivel
13 years ago

](*,)

Originally Posted by: porky88 


What's your point? Are you saying that if you had laid down a wad of cash to attend this game, you wouldn't have felt ripped off? I know I would have. There wasn't a single pleasurable moment in that game that I can think of -- except maybe the interception or the sack. Even the scoring came off botched touchdown attempts or outright bad calls by the officials. There can be a certain pleasure to the agony of defeat when the home team comports itself valiantly, but that performance was just embarrassing.
UserPostedImage
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
13 years ago

What's your point? Are you saying that if you had laid down a wad of cash to attend this game, you wouldn't have felt ripped off? I know I would have. There wasn't a single pleasurable moment in that game that I can think of -- except maybe the interception or the sack. Even the scoring came off botched touchdown attempts or outright bad calls by the officials. There can be a certain pleasure to the agony of defeat when the home team comports itself valiantly, but that performance was just embarrassing.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 



Well, the first offensive play (Grant for 19) looked pretty sweet.

[grin1]

Agree with the general sentiments, of course.

And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Nonstopdrivel
13 years ago
Good point. The first play did look promising.=d>
UserPostedImage
evad04
13 years ago

We're starting to feel like a team that never shows up for 60, and on this past Sunday, didn't show up at all.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 


In your estimation, how many teams in the NFL play consistently well for 60 minutes?
William Henderson didn't have to run people over. His preferred method was levitation.
"I'm a reasonable man, get off my case."
Nonstopdrivel
13 years ago
I don't think we saw any teams last weekend consistently play well for 60 minutes. Except perhaps the Patriots, but that game was even less entertaining than the Packers/Giants game, if such a thing were possible.
UserPostedImage
Jon305
13 years ago
back to back is diffcult indeed. However its hard to just take a deep breath and say we'll be back next year, which I have no doubt we will. Just the fact that weren't the green bay packers on sunday makes it so much more painful. As bad as the defense is I'll take this team over anyother team in the nfl right we shot ourselves were superbowl bound if it werent for this tragic output
blank
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
13 years ago
Evad04 makes a good point. It's rare that a team plays well all 60 minutes.

On the other hand, I'm not sure the Packers played well for six consecutive minutes Sunday. Or perhaps 6 minutes at all.
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
porky88
13 years ago

What's your point? Are you saying that if you had laid down a wad of cash to attend this game, you wouldn't have felt ripped off? I know I would have. There wasn't a single pleasurable moment in that game that I can think of -- except maybe the interception or the sack. Even the scoring came off botched touchdown attempts or outright bad calls by the officials. There can be a certain pleasure to the agony of defeat when the home team comports itself valiantly, but that performance was just embarrassing.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 


I used that smiley because I was at the game and that's what it feels like now. Seriously, the best part of the game was seeing the bomber fly over before kickoff. Beyond that, this was such a disappointment.
Fan Shout
beast (8h) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
Martha Careful (12h) : meh
Zero2Cool (16h) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
Zero2Cool (16h) : It's so awesome.
Zero2Cool (16h) : new site fan shout post fast
wpr (20h) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
wpr (20h) : Only 4
wpr (20h) : Only 4
Zero2Cool (22h) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
dfosterf (23h) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately
Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.
dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

29-Mar / Random Babble / wpr

28-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

26-Mar / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.