zombieslayer
12 years ago
Or to put it more simply, you still need a D in today's NFL. Our O didn't put up 40+ pts yesterday and because of that, we lost. We can't expect our O to put up that many points every week. My bad feeling about the game started when the Giants were trying to run out the clock in the 2nd Q and ended up with a TD because everyone on our D forgot how to tackle.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
RedSoxExcel
12 years ago
NSD, two of the four QBs are "elite" QBs. I hate Manning but he had a pretty good regular season and he looked way better than Matt Ryan or Aaron Rodgers the last two weeks. If its Giants v. Pats in the SB, the whole theory has a lot of holes. Unless the Ravens pull off something insane, I think you will see the Pats in the Super Bowl. Even the 49ers, I don't think their D played awesome in the Saints game, it was really the Offense that won that game for them with that crazy drive at the end.

Also unrelated but like I said in another thread a while back, is home field really "home field" for the Packers in January. We're kind of built like a Dome team for an explosive offense. In a Dome, I think we destroy the Giants.
blank
Nonstopdrivel
12 years ago
There are only 32 starting QBs in the league. Therefore, no more than 3 or 4 quarterbacks can be called "elite"; otherwise you are stretching the meaning of the word beyond recognition. From a statistical point of view, Eli Manning was certainly excellent this year, but he was not elite. But that's not the point. The point is the two "elitest" quarterbacks are sitting at home right now, while two quarterbacks who are far from elite will be playing in their respective conference championships. Meanwhile, two of the best defenses in the league -- and one that after a terrible start to the season is newly resurgent -- are propelling their teams toward a championship berth. You need more than an elite quarterback to make a championship run.

And even if the most unlikely scenario pans out -- the Giants and Patriots both make it to the Super Bowl -- it in no way invalidates the theory. Two or three exceptions in the history of the sport don't discredit the correlation. That's the whole concept of outliers . Over time, all trends tend to regress back to the mean, and I have no doubt this one will as well.

Something I forgot to mention in my previous post was that never in the history of the current playoff format have the higher seeds/home teams started out 8-0. The home teams had already gone 7-0 in this tournament, so unfortunately, yet again the Packers were on the wrong side of history.
UserPostedImage
evad04
12 years ago
"The offensive line is a revolving door . . . the receivers can't hold onto the ball when it really counts . . . the running game can't close out games . . . and the defense simply cannot get a stop when it really matters."

I think you take it too far. They played an awful game yesterday. For much of the season the defense DID come up with a stop when it mattered, and if they couldn't, the offense came up with big plays. The receivers held on to plenty of balls when it counted. The running game wasn't often asked to close out games, though the few times it was they got the job done.

I'm not delusional -- Green Bay needs to improve in a number of areas. But they were still one of the top teams this season, no doubt. It's all about playing well in the tournament, like the 2010 Packers. This team didn't play well yesterday. In fact, they played their worst game of the season. It happens, and I fail to see how the whole situation requires complexity.
William Henderson didn't have to run people over. His preferred method was levitation.
"I'm a reasonable man, get off my case."
Rios39
12 years ago

"The offensive line is a revolving door . . . the receivers can't hold onto the ball when it really counts . . . the running game can't close out games . . . and the defense simply cannot get a stop when it really matters."

I think you take it too far. They played an awful game yesterday. For much of the season the defense DID come up with a stop when it mattered, and if they couldn't, the offense came up with big plays. The receivers held on to plenty of balls when it counted. The running game wasn't often asked to close out games, though the few times it was they got the job done.

I'm not delusional -- Green Bay needs to improve in a number of areas. But they were still one of the top teams this season, no doubt. It's all about playing well in the tournament, like the 2010 Packers. This team didn't play well yesterday. In fact, they played their worst game of the season. It happens, and I fail to see how the whole situation requires complexity.

Originally Posted by: evad04 



A similar thing happened to the Patriots last year. I figured with the year Brady had, even with their shaky D that they would likely go to the SB. They came out flat in the divisional round at home against the Jets and were chasing them from the get go.

Was very similar to this years Packers because overall the Patriots went 14-2 but you could say in all 3 phases they'd be the worst 14-2 team you would ever see.
blank
RedSoxExcel
12 years ago
If it's 3 or 4, who is your #4 QB in the league, if not Manning. He has a SB, plays outdoors, puts up awesome numbers, has beat Favre, Rodgers and Brady in the playoffs (including Favre and Rodgers on the road). I hate him but I was wrong on him, after yesterdays game, I think there is no doubt he is an "elite" QB - which my definition is the top 3-4 QBs in the league.

It's difficult to win without a superstar D but its not impossible by any means. The Saints won two years ago with a D that gave up 350+ yards I am pretty sure. Everyone on O (except for Driver but including Rodgers, Jennings, Grant, etc.) crapped the bed. It happens, we faced a hot team at the wrong time coming off rusty. Its hard to win back to back Super Bowls. It sucks but I think it's just one of those days where we were just beat. I don't think the team was fundamentally flawed or anything, we went 15-1. We counted on the O for a lot of those games, the O sucked and that's on them just as much as it is on the D. If you give me the option of having our team or the 49ers, I'll take our team even with their mighty D - the O just picked the wrong day to not show up. But may be that is just me - I still think we're the better team than the Giants, the 49ers, etc. If we played them in a 7 game series, we win but its one and done, oh well. If the O showed up yesterday without all those turnovers and strange onside kick call and strange 4th and 5 call, I bet the Giants get to may be 23 points.
blank
Stevetarded
12 years ago
Just something I noticed because of last nights game. Desmond Bishop doesn't really get enough credit. He was probably the best player on the field last night offense or defense for the Packers. He had several big games this year as well and was one of the most reliable players on D throughout the year.
blank
RedSoxExcel
12 years ago
[On a second thought, I will erase this comment to not cause the usual debate between me and NSD - very mature of me :)]
blank
zombieslayer
12 years ago

Just something I noticed because of last nights game. Desmond Bishop doesn't really get enough credit. He was probably the best player on the field last night offense or defense for the Packers. He had several big games this year as well and was one of the most reliable players on D throughout the year.

Originally Posted by: Stevetarded 



No. I noticed it too.

A lot of folks think we need a rusher opposite of CM3 to take some pressure off CM3. I actually think we need one from the DL; someone to replace C Jenkins. Looking back, I think losing C Jenkins is probably the top factor to why our D went from elite last year to mediocre this year. Yes, the Collins injury is a factor as well. But nobody from the DL this year was generating enough pressure. C Jenkins did last year.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Rios39
12 years ago

No. I noticed it too.

A lot of folks think we need a rusher opposite of CM3 to take some pressure off CM3. I actually think we need one from the DL; someone to replace C Jenkins. Looking back, I think losing C Jenkins is probably the top factor to why our D went from elite last year to mediocre this year. Yes, the Collins injury is a factor as well. But nobody from the DL this year was generating enough pressure. C Jenkins did last year.

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 



we need another LB to get pressure BUT... It will only help us so far because they will have to fend off that OLB and Clay but that's kind of easy do with just outside pressure, the linebacker would see more of the same with being double teamed or just being foreced to take the long way around. We need to get some pressure up the middle, doesn't even have to be sacks but just a push up the middle with Raji which will give no escape from the outside rush from the LB's.

All the great 3-4 D's have good push up the middle and TWO pass rushing LB's. Then keep in mind that Bishop coming through the middle will just add to the havoc.
blank
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    Mucky Tundra (50m) : Or ties, but let's be real here
    Mucky Tundra (50m) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
    Mucky Tundra (51m) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
    buckeyepackfan (1h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?
    Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks
    Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.
    Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak
    beast (21-Dec) : So far the college playoffs have sucked... One team absolutely dominates the other
    beast (21-Dec) : Well even if you weren't positive towards a guy, you wouldn't nessarily want to tell the media that (if they don't know about it)
    Martha Careful (21-Dec) : I think MLF want Love to look past the end half issues, and feel good about his play. Our coaches generally keep a very positive tone.
    beast (21-Dec) : I think a great running game will do that for most QBs
    packerfanoutwest (21-Dec) : Coach Matt LaFleur has said quarterback Jordan Love is playing the best football of his career.
    beast (21-Dec) : Oh, that's how you keep beating buckeye, with cheating
    Zero2Cool (20-Dec) : There is a rule that if your name starts with 'b' you lose 15 points. Hey, I don't make the rules, I just enforce them!
    wpr (20-Dec) : and then there is Beast. Running away with it all.
    beast (20-Dec) : As of tonight, 3 way tie for 2nd in Pick'em, that battle is interesting!
    beast (20-Dec) : Lions vs Vikings could be the main last game as it could determine division winners or #1 vs #2 seed
    Mucky Tundra (20-Dec) : Or if KC needs to win for the #1 seed
    Mucky Tundra (20-Dec) : Right now it looks like the only prime worthy games are Det-Minny and KC-Denver (if Denver can clinch a wild card spot)
    Mucky Tundra (20-Dec) : The entirety of week 18 being listed as flex is weird
    Zero2Cool (19-Dec) : Matt LaFleur today says unequivocally "Ted Thompson had nothing to do with the drafting of Jordan Love."
    Zero2Cool (19-Dec) : Apparently, the editing is what pieces comments together. That Ted thing ... fake news.
    Zero2Cool (19-Dec) : LaFleur "opportunity that Ted Thompson thought was too good to pass up"
    Zero2Cool (19-Dec) : Jordan Love pick was Ted Thompson's idea.
    Mucky Tundra (19-Dec) : Kyle Shanahan on signing De'Vondre Campbell as a FA last offseason: “We obviously made a mistake.”
    packerfanoutwest (19-Dec) : Alexander’s last season with GB
    Martha Careful (18-Dec) : if I were a professional athlete, I would probably look to see who the agent is for Kirk Cousins and then use him
    beast (18-Dec) : $100 million fully guaranteed Kirk Cousins gets benched for rookie
    Mucky Tundra (18-Dec) : a lower case b
    Mucky Tundra (18-Dec) : The real lie is how beast capitalized his name in his message while it's normally spelled with
    packerfanoutwest (18-Dec) : haha that's a lie
    beast (17-Dec) : Despite what lies other might tell, Beast didn't hate the Winter Warnings, it felt refreshing to Beast for some reason.
    Zero2Cool (17-Dec) : whiteout uniforms in general are pretty lame and weak. NFL greed at it's worst
    Martha Careful (17-Dec) : The Viking uniforms, the whiteout uniforms specifically absolutely suck
    beast (17-Dec) : Thanks Zero2Cool, looks a lot better now
    beast (17-Dec) : Seems like someone has a crush on me, can't stop talking about me
    Zero2Cool (17-Dec) : Should be gooder now. The forum default theme went to goofy land.
    Zero2Cool (17-Dec) : What the hell
    packerfanoutwest (17-Dec) : yeah beast hates the Winter Warning Unies
    Mucky Tundra (16-Dec) : Okay I'm glad to know it's not just something happening to me lol
    Mucky Tundra (16-Dec) : Zero, did you copy the Packers uniforms from last night and white out the board?
    beast (16-Dec) : Oh crap, is the board going to the Winter Warning Uniforms too?!? It's all white on white right now!
    Zero2Cool (16-Dec) : WR Odell Beckham Jr is officially a free agent after clearing waivers.
    Zero2Cool (16-Dec) : Packers are 6th in sacks.
    Zero2Cool (16-Dec) : RB David Montgomery will undergo season-ending knee surgery.
    Mucky Tundra (16-Dec) : Dan Campbell on onside kick with 12 minutes left: In hindsight, wish I didn’t do that
    Zero2Cool (16-Dec) : They have that whole 12th man thing so ...
    Zero2Cool (16-Dec) : Of the times we've played there, I just can't recall hearing our fans.
    wpr (16-Dec) : Well done jdlax. Well done.
    wpr (16-Dec) : I think more likely to be Pack fans that live in the area.
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM
    Vikings
    Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
    BEARS
    Recent Topics
    1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    22h / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

    19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

    18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.