Divisional [2011] Green Bay Packers vs New York Giants

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

13 years ago

Green Bay Packers ( 15 - 1 )
[list]

Total Offense = 3rd

Passing Offense = 3rd

Rushing Offense = 27th

Total Defense = 32nd

Passing Defense = 32nd

Rushing Defense = 14th

Points For = 35.0 (1st)

Points Against = 22.4 (19th)[/list]

New York Giants ( 9 - 7 )
[list]

Total Offense = 8th

Passing Offense = 5th

Rushing Offense = 32nd

Total Defense = 27th

Passing Defense = 29th

Rushing Defense = 19th

Points For = 24.6 (9th)

Points Against = 25.0 (25th)[/list]

Access Code:

jennings

Wanna join the discussion?! Login to your PACKERSHOME forum account or Register a new forum account

Porforis
Veteran Member

13 years ago

This will be an interesting one... I would have rather faced the Falcons, and unless the Giants game against the Falcons was a fluke, a multidimensional offense and a defense that can get pressure with their front four will challenge the Packers. The Packers have been able to get away with bringing their B game and winning a handful of times this year, but this is the playoffs. If both teams bring their A game, Packers win by 7, say 34-27 which will be my overall prediction. ARod 25-38, 310 Yd, 3TD 1INT, Packers with two takeaways.

shield4life
Veteran Member

13 years ago

If Tebow put up 300 yards 2 td's on Pitsburgh's defense ... then AR should easily put up 400 yards 4 tds ... Not worried, Greg Jennings back will get them off guard.

Glad To Be A Packers Fan.

RedSoxExcel
Registered

13 years ago

Goddddd, I did not want to play the Giants. They are dangerous, they either stink or look unbeatable. Hopefully the stinky team shows up.

blank

Dexter_Sinister
Registered

13 years ago

The Giants, "We want the ball and we're gonna win."

I want to go out like my Grandpa did. Peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming in terror like his passengers.

Dexter_Sinister
Registered

13 years ago

The dolts on FOX after the Falcons-Giants game were saying how the powerful Giants defense could overtake the Packers. Then next they starting talking about the 49ers-Saints game and how defense might not be enough to win. I'm not sure why defense would be important against the Packers, but not against the Saints. Idiots.

Originally Posted by: rabidgopher04

Last week Billick was talking about how the Lions game was going to be such a ground game because of the weather. At the end of the game they were talking about how wrong he was. Then they went right into how the next game would be such a ground game because of the weather, no matter who we played.

I want to go out like my Grandpa did. Peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming in terror like his passengers.

Dulak
Veteran Member

13 years ago

Goddddd, I did not want to play the Giants. They are dangerous, they either stink or look unbeatable. Hopefully the stinky team shows up.

Originally Posted by: RedSoxExcel

ya I have watched their last 3 games - they look tough ... defense, running game and now passing game ... only thing I laugh at is their STs (lol blackmon)

TheKanataThrilla
Veteran Member

13 years ago

Originally Posted by: rabidgopher04

The difference in my opinion is that the Giants can get into a shoot-out if necessary, where the 49ers do not have the team to put up the 30 points they may need to win the game againts the Saints.

I don't have a good feeling about the Giants game. I hate playing a team with some momentum and swagger going in. Even though some of the teams they beat down the stretch were in free-fall mode ('Girls and the Jets) they still have amped up their pass pressure. Hopefully our O-line is up to the task of keep ARod up-right next Sunday.

DakotaT
Select Member

13 years ago

I look at it this way: if we're on our game and firing on all cylinders, we can't be beat. The Packers beat themselves when they lose, so what difference does it make who we play? The O-line will be back at full strength for the first time in 10 games. G-men will still have to blitz to get to Aaron, and then they're dog meat.

TheKanataThrilla
Veteran Member

13 years ago

#10

Originally Posted by: DakotaT

I totally agree. This is where this thread and the home team advantage thread intersect. I am hoping for a nice day in GB next weekend so Aaron can burn the Giant secondary when they send in their blitz packages. Praying for no drops from our WRs and TEs.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

beast (3h) : If they aren't doing it, then why are you assuming they know how to do it?

dfosterf (9h) : Mackelvie

dfosterf (9h) : Michael Macelvie- NFL teams know how to draft- Why don"t they?

dfosterf (9h) : Youtube

Zero2Cool (13h) : Packers were not selected for the 2025 Hall of Fame game.

dfosterf (16h) : PFOW Out of our division would be a good thing imo

Zero2Cool (17h) : Jameson Williams is done at 24 years old? What? He's a WR, not QB. I'm missing something here haha

wpr (18h) : Tomorrow is almost here.

packerfanoutwest (18h) : would you want him if Pack needed a back up qb?

packerfanoutwest (18h) : JW is done......stick a fork in him

Zero2Cool (20h) : You should. He goes to AFC that helps Packers.

packerfanoutwest (23-Apr) : don't care

Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Lions shopping Jameson Williams?

packerfanoutwest (22-Apr) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.

Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat

wpr (22-Apr) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.

wpr (22-Apr) : now 3

Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Who? What?

beast (22-Apr) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?

Martha Careful (21-Apr) : meh

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast

wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.

wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!

dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am

wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days

beast (18-Apr) : 6 days

wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep

dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire

dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that

dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24