Divisional [2011] Green Bay Packers vs New York Giants· Page 6

DGB454
Registered

12 years ago

Just finished watching the Giants-Packers game on NFL channel. I feel a little better about the game Sunday.
They were missing Hawk, Bishop, Sitton, Clifton and Starks.
Woodson left in the 2nd half.

There was plenty of pressure on Aaron but he was able to scramble and make plays.

Originally Posted by: wpr

Not to mention Eli had one of his best games of the season while Aaron had one of his worst games. All he has to do is be a little bit better this game. Espscially with all those guys healthy again.

wpr
Preferred Member

12 years ago

#52

Not to mention Eli had one of his best games of the season while Aaron had one of his worst games. All he has to do is be a little bit better this game. Espscially with all those guys healthy again.

Originally Posted by: DGB454

one can argue the reason for Aaron having a poor outing was NYs DL pressure. Umenyiora was out that game. Of course he and Pierre-Paul play the same position so most of the time they both won't be in there.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

12 years ago

#53

Aaron Rodgers threw for more than 350 yards and 4 touchdowns. That was not his worst game, not even up to that point. The 18 or so incompletions and one interception ... don't let the numbers fool you. Aaron Rodgers led a great end of fourth quarter drive to get the Packers the win. There's no way you can say that was his worst game.

Yerko
Senior Member

12 years ago

#54

Originally Posted by: wpr

But....but....but the Giants were missing Osi and Manningham!!!
NFL Network actually tried to compare the Giants WR and the Packers WR last night.
I really just think the media is trying their best to hype this game as much as possible and instead of talking about that team in the little town of Green Bay, they need to hype up the big New York (not even in New York) team.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

12 years ago

#55

Apparently.... from PFT... Antrel Rolle promises that his Giants defense won’t give up 38 points again to the Packers.

That's okay because the Packers plan on putting up 40+, bitch!

nerdmann
Premier Member

12 years ago

#56

Keep in mind that game was also played at their house. This one is at Lambeau. Seifert has a pretty decent analysis of our matchups v the Giants.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

kobe16
Registered

12 years ago

#57

Giants are talking trash but I think we're gonna win.

DGB454
Registered

12 years ago

#58

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

I said one of his worst games. Not his worst.

Dexter_Sinister
Registered

12 years ago

#59

Sounds like the media is also saying the Packer O-line is "banged up".

I want to go out like my Grandpa did. Peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming in terror like his passengers.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

12 years ago

#60

I said one of his worst games. Not his worst.

Originally Posted by: DGB454

Okay, it's still not at all accurate no matter how you sugar coat it. Aaron Rodgers doesn't have "worst" games in 2011.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (1h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (1h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (1h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (1h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (2h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (2h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (2h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (2h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (2h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (2h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (2h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (2h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (2h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (2h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (2h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (2h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (2h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (2h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (2h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (2h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (2h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (2h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (2h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (2h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

packerfanoutwest (3h) : falcons are already ahead of us

beast (3h) : Packers will get in

beast (3h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen

packerfanoutwest (3h) : they still are in the playoffs

packerfanoutwest (3h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7

Zero2Cool (4h) : We can say it. We don't play.

Mucky Tundra (6h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints

Mucky Tundra (6h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games

Mucky Tundra (6h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.

buckeyepackfan (6h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.

Mucky Tundra (15h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan

beast (16h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings

bboystyle (16h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in

Mucky Tundra (19h) : Or ties, but let's be real here

Mucky Tundra (19h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses

Mucky Tundra (19h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch

buckeyepackfan (19h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?

Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks

Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.

Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak

beast (21-Dec) : So far the college playoffs have sucked... One team absolutely dominates the other

beast (21-Dec) : Well even if you weren't positive towards a guy, you wouldn't nessarily want to tell the media that (if they don't know about it)

Martha Careful (21-Dec) : I think MLF want Love to look past the end half issues, and feel good about his play. Our coaches generally keep a very positive tone.

beast (21-Dec) : I think a great running game will do that for most QBs

packerfanoutwest (21-Dec) : Coach Matt LaFleur has said quarterback Jordan Love is playing the best football of his career.

beast (21-Dec) : Oh, that's how you keep beating buckeye, with cheating

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS