If they let in guys like Steve Largent and Art Monk, McNabb's got a shot at the Hall.

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 

I don't see why Steve Largent shouldn't be in.

I'd rather they have a look at Randall Cunningham than Donovan McNabb. He didn't put up the career numbers, but when that man peaked, very few came close to him. And that's including Falcons-Vick.

Originally Posted by: Rockmolder 

Take a look at Cris Carter and then put him side by side with Largent, then tell me why Largent is in and Carter isn't. Carter had dominant years. Largent had one dominant year. Just like Steve Smith. I like Steve Smith, but he doesn't belong in the Hall either.

As for Cunningham, I don't think any sane person would put Vick over Cunningham. Cunningham actually could throw the football. Twice, he threw for 30+ TDs. Vick's highest total was 21. That's not very impressive.

Now if I were running the Hall, none of the people we mentioned would be in there. Hall of Fame should be made up of players who dominated their peers.

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 

If they let in guys like Steve Largent and Art Monk, McNabb's got a shot at the Hall.

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 

I'm trying to figure out how this goes with McNabb signing with the Vikings? lol

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 

Because that was the way the thread was going. Someone brought up McNabb having a shot at making the Hall of Fame.

We're talking about his career. McNabb's most likely going to retire after this season as if he can't cut it for the Vikings, who's going to want him?

I think it's an excellent progression. McNabb signs with the Vikings. McNabb fails. McNabb will probably retire after his agent desperately shops for another team and fails. Now, will McNabb make the Hall or not?

I say no, but he'll be nominated.

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer