wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
13 years ago
I wonder what the Vegas line will be on Suh's time out. I think he has to get at least 3 games. Prior actions, shoving EDS head in the ground. Stomping on his arm and then lying will make it more than 1 game.
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
13 years ago
With this victory, the Packers

[list]
  • Win an impressive 3 games in 10 days
  • Equal their best regular-season record of the Rodgers era (11)
  • Set a team record for single-season winning streak (11)
  • Extend the team record for consecutive wins, including postseason (17)
  • Extend the league record for consecutive wins without trailing in the 4th quarter (17)
  • Cement their hold on the No. 1 seed for at least three more weeks, regardless of what happens with the rest of the league
  • Clinch a playoff berth with a Falcons loss and a Giants loss
  • [/list]

    Aaron Rodgers also

    [list]
  • Ties the league record for most games in a single season with a passer rating of at least 110 (11)
  • Extends his league record for most consecutive regular-season games with a passer rating of at least 110 (11)
  • Extends his streak of most consecutive games, including playoffs, with a passer rating of at least 110 (12)[/list]

  • All in all, not bad for a day's work.

    (By the way, Aaron Rodgers' passer rating has exceeded 110 in 14 of his previous 15 games, the only exception being the NFC Championship Game against the Chicago Bears.)
    UserPostedImage
    Nonstopdrivel
    13 years ago
    This comment over on the ESPN blog made me chuckle:

    The Packers have now won 17 games in a row:

    And the Lions are now part of this incredible streak - the only NFCN team excluded from the list until now.

    The Packers are kind to all.

    trekmanagain wrote:


    UserPostedImage
    Nonstopdrivel
    13 years ago
    Another interesting comment by the same guy:

    Lions had the ball on "O" 11 times in the game and field position was a problem for the entire game.

    Started drives on their own:

    20 / 15 / 16 / 20 / 21 / 29 / 19 / 27 / 28 / 16 / 21

    Never started a drive further than their own 29 yard line - Packers special teams had a great game. Maybe the best game of the year.

    trekmanagain wrote:



    And I read this in the USA Today this morning.

    But first comes a break, akin to a second bye week. Coach Mike McCarthy, who trumpeted Thursdays' outing as "a good character win," is giving players off until Tuesday. He hopes they will return rested for the stretch run.

    McCarthy was asked if the days off were meant as incentive.

    "I was going to do that anyway," McCarthy said, "and the selfish son of guns tried to talk me into giving them until Wednesday."



    Nice to see the head coach has a sense of humor.
    UserPostedImage
    Nonstopdrivel
    13 years ago
    Of course, no discussion would be complete without Skip Bayless' take:

    I love Suh but immature temper, ejection cost Det the game. Pack would've been held to FG, 10-0. ARodg struggling. Then roof fell in. Suh me

    RealSkipBayless wrote:


    Kevin Smith lost early, more DB injuries, Hanson missed easy FG, Suh self-destructs - this season meant-to-be for Green Bay. More breaks!

    RealSkipBayless wrote:


    A lot of us in media have "enabled" Suh by defending him, glorifying him, saying he's intimidating, not dirty. Man-CHILD. Spoiled brat. Sad.

    RealSkipBayless wrote:


    So alarming Suh took no responsibility, offered no apology to fans or teammates, in dangerous denial. Will increase his punishment from NFL.

    RealSkipBayless wrote:


    Suh deserves a 2-game suspension. He didn't go Haynesworth and stomp a man w/o helmet in the face. But he stomped an arm. Repeat offender.

    RealSkipBayless wrote:



    In other words, the Packers aren't actually playing all that great this year. They're just lucky. They're getting all the breaks because, y'know, the NFL wants them to have a magical year.
    UserPostedImage
    Nonstopdrivel
    13 years ago
    Another quote from the ESPN blog that made me laugh.

    Typically, when I walk, I lean really far to one side and then shoot my leg downward in the direction opposite from which I am moving. Its a very natural and way utilitarian to move from one space to another.

    bpalton911 wrote:


    I also find the need that when I get up off of the ground that it is completely natural to smash someone's head into the turf 3-4 times.

    gabes22 wrote:



    There are a lot of creative guys over there. I wish we could recruit some of them to this site.
    UserPostedImage
    all_about_da_packers
    13 years ago
    Perhaps the most interesting thing from the win, aside from DJ Smith emerging as Desmond Bishop-light and Robert Francois showing something with his play, was our defensive play-calling.

    (Almost) Exclusively nickel and dime. Rarely did we see Capers go to base 3-4. Capers' philosophy isn't hard to predict: shut down run, make team 1 dimensional, and attack like no tomorrow. In part due to this philosophy, we have seen teams come out and own the D early this year by establishing the pass game from the word "go".

    Yesterday seemed to be a complete departure from this philosophy. While in nickel, Capers seemed content to let the Lions get their running yards, and to have check downs. Minimal rush, zone in the middle, corners in man, 2 deep safety with Burnett usually rotating towards Megatron.

    Usually with this style of D, you have to have players be sure tacklers. In other words, you play to minimize the damage, making the offense work to get down the field; limit big plays. Go for the fumble, but not at the expense of making the sure tackle in other words.

    No doubt it worked, but our players are aggressive, often wanting to make big plays at the expense of making the sure plays; try to cause a fumble instead of making the tackle first. Yet the players (for the most part) seemed to play within what yesterday's game plan required. They got big plays, no doubt. But they did not seem to force the issue.

    I just find it very interesting that for a group of players that can fairly be criticized for wanting to make splash plays at the expense of sure plays, our defenders played as disciplined as they did. I find it even more interesting that Capers had the confidence in his players to game plan this way. I'm not sure what exactly it says overall about our D, but I honestly feel much, much better coming out of this game about our D than I have at any point since the start of the season. We don't need to have a "blitz like no tomorrow or we're gonna get our asses toast" mentality. Props to Capers for realizing that, and to our players for showing that.
    The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.
    Zero2Cool
    13 years ago

    Another quote from the ESPN blog that made me laugh.




    There are a lot of creative guys over there. I wish we could recruit some of them to this site.

    Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 


    I'm not telling you not to.
    UserPostedImage
    DoddPower
    13 years ago
    AADP,

    You know, as long as our offense is scoring pretty frequently, that's not a bad way to play D. Score quick, get up a couple scores, and make the offense methodically drive the length of the field on every drive. Even if they score, hopefully it takes several minutes. Of course, this style of defense relies as much on our offense as defense to either A) continue to score or 😎 take lots of time off the clock. Eventually, most teams will simply run out of time to catch up. Of course, all this relies on our defense actually being able to get a few stops and us getting ahead by 10 or so. It's an interesting concept of allowing the offense to be as much of a defense as the actual defense. Or better said, our offense almost dictates how our defense schemes/plays. I'm not exactly sure if that's a good thing, but I could see it working . . . as long as our offense is clicking.

    EDIT: I'm convinced that Capers is absolutely focusing on winning the game with such a scheme. Obviously, that's the main goal, but I mean to say that he could care less about sacks, yards, and even scoring in some cases. As long as the opponent remains a couple of scores down and the scoring drive takes ~4+ minutes. To hell with yards and points given up, just make sure you give up less points than the offense has scored.
    azrunning
    13 years ago

    Perhaps the most interesting thing from the win, aside from DJ Smith emerging as Desmond Bishop-light and Robert Francois showing something with his play, was our defensive play-calling.

    (Almost) Exclusively nickel and dime. Rarely did we see Capers go to base 3-4. Capers' philosophy isn't hard to predict: shut down run, make team 1 dimensional, and attack like no tomorrow. In part due to this philosophy, we have seen teams come out and own the D early this year by establishing the pass game from the word "go".

    Yesterday seemed to be a complete departure from this philosophy. While in nickel, Capers seemed content to let the Lions get their running yards, and to have check downs. Minimal rush, zone in the middle, corners in man, 2 deep safety with Burnett usually rotating towards Megatron.

    Usually with this style of D, you have to have players be sure tacklers. In other words, you play to minimize the damage, making the offense work to get down the field; limit big plays. Go for the fumble, but not at the expense of making the sure tackle in other words.

    No doubt it worked, but our players are aggressive, often wanting to make big plays at the expense of making the sure plays; try to cause a fumble instead of making the tackle first. Yet the players (for the most part) seemed to play within what yesterday's game plan required. They got big plays, no doubt. But they did not seem to force the issue.

    I just find it very interesting that for a group of players that can fairly be criticized for wanting to make splash plays at the expense of sure plays, our defenders played as disciplined as they did. I find it even more interesting that Capers had the confidence in his players to game plan this way. I'm not sure what exactly it says overall about our D, but I honestly feel much, much better coming out of this game about our D than I have at any point since the start of the season. We don't need to have a "blitz like no tomorrow or we're gonna get our asses toast" mentality. Props to Capers for realizing that, and to our players for showing that.

    Originally Posted by: all_about_da_packers 



    I think they played that defense against detroit because of their offense. They are a big play offense throwing deep to Johnson. Against minnesota they were blitz happy because they have a rookie quarterback and not much for receivers. I like seeing that Capers and the Pack can play different styles and be successful. Of course with the Packers' offense being successful is a lot easier.
    BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
    Users browsing this topic
      Fan Shout
      Zero2Cool (50m) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.
      dfosterf (3h) : I'm going with a combination of the two.
      beast (4h) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC
      Zero2Cool (21h) : Fake news. Cowboys say no
      Zero2Cool (22h) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
      beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
      beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
      Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
      Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
      dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
      Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
      dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
      Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
      wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
      wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
      Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
      wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
      dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
      Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
      Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
      Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
      Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
      dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
      beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
      beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
      beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
      Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
      beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
      beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
      wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
      wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
      wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
      Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
      Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
      Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
      Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
      Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
      Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
      Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
      Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
      beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury
      beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State
      beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State
      Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled
      Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond
      Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh
      Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Oh snap!!!
      Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Even Stevie Wonder can see that.
      Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Nah, you see Lions OC leaving to be HC of Bears is directly related to Packers.
      Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ohhhhhhh Zero is in TROUBLE
      Please sign in to use Fan Shout
      2024 Packers Schedule
      Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
      Eagles
      Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
      COLTS
      Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
      Titans
      Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
      VIKINGS
      Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
      Rams
      Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
      CARDINALS
      Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
      TEXANS
      Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
      Jaguars
      Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
      LIONS
      Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
      Bears
      Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
      49ERS
      Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
      DOLPHINS
      Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
      Lions
      Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
      Seahawks
      Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
      SAINTS
      Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
      Vikings
      Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
      BEARS
      Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
      Eagles
      Recent Topics
      3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

      22-Jan / Random Babble / packerfanoutwest

      21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

      21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

      20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

      20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

      20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

      20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

      19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

      18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

      17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

      17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

      17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

      16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

      16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

      Headlines
      Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.