James Jones 'bothered' with week one playing time· Page 8

dfosterf
Veteran Member

13 years ago

I love having James Jones in our wide receiver corps. He drops some, but he also does some awesome things in clutch situations.

To date, I like him better than Jordy, and I like Jordy just fine. If that is the extent of the public whine to come from Jones, we are- as we already knew- extraordinarily blessed to have such a non-whiney, non-diva, non "me-first" receiving group, especially in the context of how talented they all are. I say keep your depth charts, your best "1-2" combos, etc... all that is not applicable in Green Bay, Wisconsin. Defenses run out of defensive backs long before the Pack runs out of very awesome wide receivers, and JAMES Jones is CERTAINLY one of them, and in some situations, the best of them.

imo.

(aside- why I capitalize JAMES Jones🤣 - it's an "old school" kinda thing, having to do with "my man", Mr. JAMES Brown)

"Good MORNING, Vietnam!"

(It was called "A FARTS"- ...stood for AFRTS Armed Forces Radio and Television Service- Ask Nick, lol)

tromadz
Registered

13 years ago

#72

Can we just cut him? He is not needed. Cobb took his job. He's done.

Check Out My Comedy Website!

dfosterf
Veteran Member

13 years ago

#73

Can we just cut him? He is not needed. Cobb took his job. He's done.

Originally Posted by: tromadz

Fuck off, Dale, see you in the chat.

😝

zombieslayer
Registered

13 years ago

#74

Can we just cut him? He is not needed. Cobb took his job. He's done.

Originally Posted by: tromadz

Not sure if you're being sarcastic or not. I will reply though assuming you're serious.

2005. Need I say more? (You can never have too many WRs).

Pack - I gave you an applause as you kept your cool with being trolled. That takes a strong gut. Kudos.

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

tromadz
Registered

13 years ago

#75

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer

I was half serious. I know we arent cutting\trading anyone, but dude needs to hush up. He is becoming expendable. His worry shouldnt be "im not on the field!" His worry should be "im not on the field, and we're freaking amazing that way!"

He needs to just hush. My prediction: Rodgers throws 3-4 balls his way this weekend, and he drops at least 1 of them which would have been a biggy.

Check Out My Comedy Website!

nerdmann
Premier Member

13 years ago

#76

So now I ask... Where does the non-sequitur aspect come in? Pretty clearly it came from you answering a post with what you would do not how you would answer the interview question.

Next time.. before insinuating that I am some "shebitch" that can't follow along.. get your shit straight ahead of time. I have the ability to discuss this sport without such a petty approach.

Originally Posted by: Pack93z

The non-sequitur comes from deliberately pretending you are "misunderstanding" what I am saying so that you can act like a pissy little shebitch no matter what I would have said. As we see here:

Alrighty Nerd.. stick yourself in his shoes and answer the question posed...

What is reaction to only getting one ball thrown your way and a handful of meaningful snaps?

Just be careful.. because I will browbeat your ass with the answer.. [grin1]

Originally Posted by: Pack93z

Now you are arguing that JJ was tricked by the media. Do you really think a veteran player on THIS team does not know how to deal with the media? Why hasn't he come out and said so? Why hasn't he made an amended statement saying his quotes were out of context?

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

Silentio
Registered

13 years ago

#77

Do you really think a veteran player on THIS team does not know how to deal with the media? Why hasn't he come out and said so? Why hasn't he made an amended statement saying his quotes were out of context?

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

Pack93z can defend himself, but I think he is saying exactly the opposite of this. Pack93z, you can correct me if I’m wrong, but aren’t you saying that Jones handled himself the best he could under the circumstances of media asking him about his limited playing time?

edit: Added six characters. See below.

blank

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

13 years ago

#78

you couldn't type the last three characters of his name? you made it past 50% ... what's the deal?

(sorry, bored off my ass researching ...)

Silentio
Registered

13 years ago

#79

you couldn't type the last three characters of his name? you made it past 50% ... what's the deal?)

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

I meant no disrespect. I am just that lazy. Boggles the mind, I know.

blank

Pack93z
Select Member

13 years ago

#80

Originally Posted by: Silentio

That is exactly the point.. it was a lose lose question for Jones. As I failed to illustrate with Nerd.. so instead of understanding the concept, Nerd bailed an resorted name calling.. now my feelings are hurt. ;)

Nerd.. try grasping the concept and context of the point.. but alas apparently you are to stuck on being well you. Not really sure why you are lashing out on me.. but really no matter, you took the only route apparently you can. I don't think I have been disrespectful towards you.. if so.. I apologize.

The point is.. the question itself is not a trick.. it is a tool for which a reporter will gain an article. Either way Jones answers it.. the reporter is going to "create" a story.

"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (23m) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (23m) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (38m) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (40m) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (40m) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (41m) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (41m) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (45m) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (45m) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (46m) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (46m) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (48m) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (50m) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (54m) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (56m) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (56m) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (1h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (1h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (1h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (1h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (1h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (1h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

packerfanoutwest (1h) : falcons are already ahead of us

beast (1h) : Packers will get in

beast (1h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen

packerfanoutwest (1h) : they still are in the playoffs

packerfanoutwest (1h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7

Zero2Cool (3h) : We can say it. We don't play.

Mucky Tundra (4h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints

Mucky Tundra (4h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games

Mucky Tundra (4h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.

buckeyepackfan (5h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.

Mucky Tundra (14h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan

beast (14h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings

bboystyle (14h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in

Mucky Tundra (18h) : Or ties, but let's be real here

Mucky Tundra (18h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses

Mucky Tundra (18h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch

buckeyepackfan (18h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?

Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks

Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.

Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak

beast (21-Dec) : So far the college playoffs have sucked... One team absolutely dominates the other

beast (21-Dec) : Well even if you weren't positive towards a guy, you wouldn't nessarily want to tell the media that (if they don't know about it)

Martha Careful (21-Dec) : I think MLF want Love to look past the end half issues, and feel good about his play. Our coaches generally keep a very positive tone.

beast (21-Dec) : I think a great running game will do that for most QBs

packerfanoutwest (21-Dec) : Coach Matt LaFleur has said quarterback Jordan Love is playing the best football of his career.

beast (21-Dec) : Oh, that's how you keep beating buckeye, with cheating

Zero2Cool (20-Dec) : There is a rule that if your name starts with 'b' you lose 15 points. Hey, I don't make the rules, I just enforce them!

wpr (20-Dec) : and then there is Beast. Running away with it all.

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS