beast
13 years ago

Carolina will finish this season as the worst team in the NFL.

I really hate overlooking teams. But if there's one game we can overlook, it's this one.

Rest anyone with a slight injury or more.

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 



Yeah because their passing game sucks...


Passing CP/AT YDS
C. Newton 24/37 422

Receiving REC YDS
S. Smith 8 178
G. Olsen 4 78
B. LaFell 4 70
Shockey 3 51
UserPostedImage
millertime
13 years ago

Yeah because their passing game sucks...


Passing CP/AT YDS
C. Newton 24/37 422

Receiving REC YDS
S. Smith 8 178
G. Olsen 4 78
B. LaFell 4 70
Shockey 3 51

Originally Posted by: beast 




I was really shocked when I saw the game stats. Hopefully Capers can make things a little more difficult for the War Eagle than Arizona did.
beast
13 years ago

I was really shocked when I saw the game stats. Hopefully Capers can make things a little more difficult for the War Eagle than Arizona did.

Originally Posted by: millertime 



Over all I'm not surprised, but I thought it'd be less passing yardage and more running yardage as they have two good RBs as well... but it's as I've said in another thread.... they got good offense options.

But the Packers offense might be able to control the ball better and keep Newton off the field. But don't sleep on the Panthers or Newton might be able to pull a Josh Freeman... facing the winless Bucs... Packers play down to their level and bang Freeman pulls out a win...

Hopefully Williams is 100% healthy and ready to go. I think if the Packers offense needs to finish one off instead of letting the defense finish them like they have been on the few last plays. Make the Panthers play catch up but don't stop scoring...

Also question... who is gonna cover Steve Smith? and who should cover Steve Smith? Smith had 178 yards and 2 TDs against the Cards. You got the #1s match up of best CB Williams vs best WR Smith... you got the Vets up match of Woodson vs Smith and the speed match up of Shields vs. Smith.

My guess if healthy they put Williams. If he's not healthy they put Woodson. I'm not sure he's quite ready but it might be interesting to test Shields on Smith... and see if he's ready. It's strength vs. strength there. But winning is more important than testing.

But I think it might be nice to have Woodson free in nickel to cover one of the TEs in his CB/S/LB role in the middle.... also he can try to trick Newton there and try to come on a quick blitz.
UserPostedImage
peteralan71
13 years ago
Newton had a monster game, especially for his professional debut. However, he had it against the Cardinals, the team that had no defense except for Dockett and Rodgers-Cromartie last year. Now with DRC gone, it's time to tee off, and Netwon did exactly that. I think next week will be a different story. I am not worried about sitting Tramon, if that is the case for this coming week.
Green Bay: Home of the Green & Gold. And the hunter orange. And the camouflage.
UserPostedImage
blueleopard
13 years ago
Steve Smith is definitely the most dynamic player on that offense and he's also a very talented route runner. The way to beat him on the outside is with man, and if he's in the slot, the Packers have to play zone.

That being said, Smith will be all over the field, so if I were forced to choose a CB lock onto him, it would be Charles Woodson. Williams may be better in coverage, but Woodson is no slouch either, but he's also very flexible and can pretty much play any position on the defense.

As long as we can apply pressure, Newton should be easy.
Danreb Victorio A Believer of Greg Jennings
beast
13 years ago

Steve Smith is definitely the most dynamic player on that offense and he's also a very talented route runner. The way to beat him on the outside is with man, and if he's in the slot, the Packers have to play zone.

That being said, Smith will be all over the field, so if I were forced to choose a CB lock onto him, it would be Charles Woodson. Williams may be better in coverage, but Woodson is no slouch either, but he's also very flexible and can pretty much play any position on the defense.

As long as we can apply pressure, Newton should be easy.

Originally Posted by: blueleopard 




My problem with having Woodson stalk Smith around the field is I'd prefer to go to the nickel defense where Woodson is the CB in the middle covering the slot or TE...because I think the 2-4 nickel could confuse Newton a lot with is Woodson gonna blitz? is he gonna zone cover? is he gonna play man to man with a TE or WR?

Plus Woodson size is nice to have when he's covering TEs... and Woodson isn't as fast as he once was... Smith is still pretty fast.
UserPostedImage
RaiderPride
13 years ago
I was ecstatic when I saw the numbers Newton and Smith put up yesterday!

Not because I am fan of either or the Panthers... Just because those numbers will keep the Packers focused this week, and there will be a much better chance that The Packers will NOT be looking at this as a bye week.
""People Will Probably Never Remember What You Said, And May Never Remember What You Did. However, People Will Always Remember How You Made Them Feel."
Nonstopdrivel
13 years ago
I couldn't agree more, RaiderPride. The cavalier attitude with which Packers fans were treating this game was seriously concerning me (I can't get Week 13, 2008 out of my head), and I was beginning to worry that the team might respond similarly. Surely Newton's stats from this week will be a clarion call that they can't take him or the Panthers for granted. I certainly hope so.
UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
13 years ago

Yeah because their passing game sucks...


Passing CP/AT YDS
C. Newton 24/37 422

Receiving REC YDS
S. Smith 8 178
G. Olsen 4 78
B. LaFell 4 70
Shockey 3 51

Originally Posted by: beast 



Good.

Smith still has it, apparently. That's a good thing because I've always liked Smith.

And Cam Newton surprised me big time. Also a good thing.

I would much rather win a game because we're the better team rather than we won a game because the other guys sucked. If Cam Newton turns out to be the savior for Carolina, this could turn out an interesting season. I would really enjoy being wrong here.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Zero2Cool
13 years ago
The Cardinals had several blown assignments that left WR's wide open during the game. I wonder if the Panthers offense created them, or if the Cardinals defense did?
UserPostedImage
Similar Topics
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    beast (1h) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
    beast (9h) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
    packerfanoutwest (14h) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
    Martha Careful (15h) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
    Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
    buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
    buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
    Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
    Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
    packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
    packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
    packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
    bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
    bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
    bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
    Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
    beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
    beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
    bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
    Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
    beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
    packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
    Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
    Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
    beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
    packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
    beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
    beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
    beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
    beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
    beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I literally just said it.
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
    Vikings
    Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
    BEARS
    Recent Topics
    1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    4h / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

    10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    11h / Random Babble / beast

    17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

    19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

    18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.