wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
13 years ago
That means about 7-10 carries each. That is not enough for one player. Pick a guy and use him. If he struggles then try the other.

The goal is for Green Bay running backs Ryan Grant and James Starks to get an equal amount of rushing attempts Thursday night against New Orleans.

That's the plan for now, anyway.

With a healthy Grant back after missing nearly all of the 2010 season, the Packers are faced with the new challenge of merging his comeback with the progression of Starks, whose late-season emergence as a rookie paced the Packers through the playoffs.

And the only way to figure it out literally is to let things play out.

"We know what they can do," first-year running backs coach Jerry Fontenot said. "It's just a matter of getting them comfortable and making sure they've gotten enough reps to do it. The only way I see them doing that is getting them as equal of work as I possibly can."

Grant ran for 83 yards in 18 carries (4.6-yard average) in the preseason, his first football action after suffering a season-ending ankle injury in the opener a year ago.

"We'll bring Ryan back in and see how he handles the game and the contact," offensive coordinator Joe Philbin said. "He looks fine. He looks like he did before he ever got injured."

Starks had just 17 yards in four carries this summer, but his production from the postseason - 315 yards in 81 carries (3.9 average) - is still fresh on everyone's mind.

Starks began 2010 on the physically unable to perform list, so this is the first time the Packers have had the two backs together.

"They're both going to take pretty much all situations in the game," Fontenot said. "Evenly dispersed? I can't guarantee it. But I'm certainly going try to get each one of those guys an equal amount of opportunities to carry the football, to hold onto the football and to control the clock for us."

In an offense that probably will rely mostly on the passing game anyway, let's hold off on calling this anything like a two-back system or running back by committee just yet.

Fontenot is simply looking for a working combination between Grant and Starks, not unlike the one he had in Chicago when he was the center and blocked for Neal Anderson and Brad Muster. Fontenot said the balanced attack featured the speedy Anderson and powerful Muster.

"It's nice to have different options at tailback," Fontenot said. "We have Ryan who is as physical as anyone, playing behind his pads - a bruising-style runner. James is more elusive in the hole, but he's still a big back and he's strong, so tacklers bounce off him.

"So, what course is better? I don't know. We'll find out."

jsonline wrote:



more online 

rabidgopher04
13 years ago

That means about 7-10 carries each. That is not enough for one player. Pick a guy and use him. If he struggles then try the other.



more online 

Originally Posted by: wpr 



Especially since Grant gets some of his biggest yardage in the 4th quarter.
Amazing Bacon Delivery  Service! Never be without good bacon again.
beast
13 years ago
This sounds like it's gonna be interesting... maybe in a good or bad way, we'll have to wait in see. I hope they have clear roles and don't have to question what the coach is gonna do next during the game because that could distract them a bit, if they're guessing what their coach is doing.

Also I wonder who the 3rd down back will be. MM said at the start of training camp, that if the season started then it would be Kuhn, fans have guessed Green would be doing it but some same he looks a bit too raw still and Grant and Starks haven't been the best in pass blocking (though it sounds like Starks was better than last year).
zombieslayer
13 years ago

Especially since Grant gets some of his biggest yardage in the 4th quarter.

Originally Posted by: rabidgopher04 



Agreed.

I'm under the impression that Grant doesn't get better in the 4th Q, but everyone else starts wearing down and Grant stays the same, thus he excels at 4th Q rushing.
My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
13 years ago

This sounds like it's gonna be interesting... maybe in a good or bad way, we'll have to wait in see. I hope they have clear roles and don't have to question what the coach is gonna do next during the game because that could distract them a bit, if they're guessing what their coach is doing.

Also I wonder who the 3rd down back will be. Mike McCarthy said at the start of training camp, that if the season started then it would be Kuhn, fans have guessed Green would be doing it but some same he looks a bit too raw still and Grant and Starks haven't been the best in pass blocking (though it sounds like Starks was better than last year).

Originally Posted by: beast 



I have a feeling for the first few weeks Green is a game day inactive unless there are a lot of injuries. They have to come up with their 7 players some place. And the 4th RB might be one of them.
13 years ago
Well, that makes my RB decision this week in FF easy. I grabbed Starks at the end of my draft for muh bench after I had just picked up Grant. I shall start them both (that's 4 RBs starting this week)!

I agree with Twinkiegorilla.

bozz_2006 wrote:


Tezzy
13 years ago

Especially since Grant gets some of his biggest yardage in the 4th quarter.

Originally Posted by: rabidgopher04 



I especially like Grant in the 4th quarter when the game is within one score.

2008
1st - 90 for 366 (4.1)
2nd - 85 for 323 (3.8)
3rd - 80 for 266 (3.3)
4th - 57 for 248 (4.4)

4th within 7 - 39 for 198 (5.1)

2009
1st - 91 for 389 (4.3)
2nd - 61 for 305 (5.0)
3rd - 67 for 272 (4.1)
4th - 74 for 351 (4.7)

4th within 7 - 25 for 120 (4.8)
On top of every beard grows a man.
"The Bears are shell-shocked... and it's breaking my heart."
Zero2Cool
13 years ago

I especially like Grant in the 4th quarter when the game is within one score.

2009
1st - 90 for 366 (4.1)
2nd - 85 for 323 (3.8)
3rd - 80 for 266 (3.3)
4th - 57 for 248 (4.4)

4th within 7 - 39 for 198 (5.1)

2010
1st - 91 for 389 (4.3)
2nd - 61 for 305 (5.0)
3rd - 67 for 272 (4.1)
4th - 74 for 351 (4.7)

4th within 7 - 25 for 120 (4.8)

Originally Posted by: Tezzy 



Impressive numbers for 2010.
PackerTraxx
13 years ago
Looks like I missed a lot last year. I'm going to have to watch much, much closer!!!LOL
Why is Jerry Kramer not in the Hall of Fame?
Pack93z
13 years ago
One could predict a heavy split two headed backfield for a while.. so this is hardly news.

IMO.. they will adjust accordingly when "trends" appear.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Fan Shout
dfosterf (1h) : Mackelvie
dfosterf (1h) : Michael Macelvie- NFL teams know how to draft- Why don"t they?
dfosterf (1h) : Youtube
Zero2Cool (6h) : Packers were not selected for the 2025 Hall of Fame game.
dfosterf (8h) : PFOW Out of our division would be a good thing imo
Zero2Cool (10h) : Jameson Williams is done at 24 years old? What? He's a WR, not QB. I'm missing something here haha
wpr (10h) : Tomorrow is almost here.
packerfanoutwest (10h) : would you want him if Pack needed a back up qb?
packerfanoutwest (10h) : JW is done......stick a fork in him
Zero2Cool (12h) : You should. He goes to AFC that helps Packers.
packerfanoutwest (23h) : don't care
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Lions shopping Jameson Williams?
packerfanoutwest (22-Apr) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat
wpr (22-Apr) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.
wpr (22-Apr) : now 3
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Who? What?
beast (22-Apr) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
Martha Careful (21-Apr) : meh
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast
wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Packers Draft Threads / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.