zombieslayer
13 years ago

See, I think what was missed in that bail out sham with the banks and auto makers was that a lot of executive folks should have received some guillotine justice. The government should not expect the common man to accept slapping those assholes on the wrist, and then allow them to continue to loot and pillage. It is unacceptable.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



Whoa. Dakota and I actually agree on something political.

For the record, Ford didn't take a single dollar. Let that be remembered in all this.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
DakotaT
13 years ago

For the record, Ford didn't take a single dollar. Let that be remembered in all this.

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 




You've seen their pickups right? I'd quit paying taxes if they received money.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
13 years ago

You've seen their pickups right? I'd quit paying taxes if they received money.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



No worries, Ford makes good trucks (their cars suck ass) and that's why your over paid salary tax dollars didn't have to go towards helping Ford. 🙂
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
  • Pack93z
  • Select Member Topic Starter
13 years ago
I was a hell of a lot more tolerate of the bailout of the Auto industry than I was of the banking industry. The banks brought the pain on themselves by the high risk loans and junk paper they were peddling..

At least the Auto industry failed in part to a struggling economy.. still didn't make it right to bail them out either.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Zero2Cool
13 years ago

I was a hell of a lot more tolerate of the bailout of the Auto industry than I was of the banking industry. The banks brought the pain on themselves by the high risk loans and junk paper they were peddling..

At least the Auto industry failed in part to a struggling economy.. still didn't make it right to bail them out either.

Originally Posted by: Pack93z 



I think the government had to bail out the auto industry so they themselves could continue to profit off oil.
UserPostedImage
vikesrule
13 years ago

See, I think what was missed in that bail out sham with the banks and auto makers was that a lot of executive folks should have received some guillotine justice. The government should not expect the common man to accept slapping those assholes on the wrist, and then allow them to continue to loot and pillage. It is unacceptable.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



Whoa. Dakota and I actually agree on something political.

zombieslayer wrote:



Yes ZS, it is truly unsettling when one finds oneself agreeing with DakotaT.
But from time time, he does come up with something valid and correct.....you know, like the old blind squirrel finding the nut adage.

And I agree wholeheartedly as well.

Me thinks that we are getting closer and closer to revolution time.

"That the people have an indubitable, unalienable, and indefeasible right to reform or change their Government,
whenever it be found adverse or inadequate to the purposes of its institution”
- James Madison





Pack93z
  • Pack93z
  • Select Member Topic Starter
13 years ago
It is almost to the point that it is pathetic.. in our quest to mush for recall after recall election, it seems that we are willing to put anyone up to run.

Seriously.. you want our vote, yet you can't name a single piece of legislation.

PS.. I can less if she is Republican or Democrat.. I find it scary that you are running for office and you can't even spend the time to survey the landscape of current business.



Simac can't name a bill she supports or opposes 

It's usually tough work to stump a professional politician, especially one in the middle of a heated race.

It's even tougher to get politicians to admit they're stumped.

But Republican Senate candidate Kim Simac acknowledged during a public forum this week that she couldn't name a single bill in Madison that she looks forward to backing or opposing if she wins.

Simac is running against Democratic Sen. Jim Holperin in one of the two last recall elections next week.

"What specific legislation is moving through the Capitol right now that you look forward to - if elected - supporting or challenging?" asked the moderator during a forum on WRJO-FM (94.5) in Eagle River.

After asking for the question to be read a second time, Simac then responded:

"Hmm, well, I think that . . . I guess I would have to say that with all of the things that I've been looking at, I think you just stumped me. All the things I've been looking at for all the last couple months here trying to get up on board as a new candidate, I've been trying to stay up with the issues, but I would have to say that I can't name you a single one right now."

She went on to say she has instead been spending her time talking with residents in her northern district trying to find out what they feel is important.


"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Zero2Cool
13 years ago
So, Brett Favre had a sex change and is getting into politics?

O
K
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (3h) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.
Zero2Cool (4h) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat
wpr (4h) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.
wpr (4h) : now 3
Zero2Cool (5h) : Who? What?
beast (14h) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
Martha Careful (18h) : meh
Zero2Cool (22h) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
Zero2Cool (22h) : It's so awesome.
Zero2Cool (22h) : new site fan shout post fast
wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
18m / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

29-Mar / Random Babble / wpr

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.