Zero2Cool
13 years ago
I like what Ryan Grant is saying about being fine with sharing the load. One of his comments stuck out to me as if he's in a contract year. :)

Green Bay - He looked so thin.

Green Bay Packers running back Ryan Grant doesn't think he slipped below 200 pounds.

But he sure looked like it.

Jeans sagged. Shoulders shrunk. His shirt looked like it was off tackle Chad Clifton's back. Hobbling around on crutches, Grant didn't look like the NFL running back that absorbed hits from linebackers and churned up 1,200-plus yards each of the previous two seasons.

He looked like just a guy.

But that was November.

This is August. And what Grant lost he has worked tirelessly for nearly a year to regain.

Grant had surgery after he suffered ligament damage in his right ankle in the 2010 opener at Philadelphia.

"I was expecting an awesome year, 1,500," he said.

"Fifteen-hundred yards?" linebacker Clay Matthews said.

Only one player - Houston's Arian Foster (1,616) - ran for that amount in 2010.

"Yeah," Grant said. "I felt strong. I felt confident where our offense was going. We were clicking."

But it was over in eight carries and 45 yards.

Grant's natural frame is thin. He's got a metabolism to die for. Without his usual penance paid to the weight room, he lost muscle tone and dropped to 205 pounds. He stands 6 feet 1 inch tall.

There are top-10 running backs that are shorter and weigh more.

Foster is 6-1 and weighs 227.

And yet a comeback by Grant last season might have been possible in late December. January for sure. The injury was healed and he could have attempted to rejoin his mates.

But Grant, coach Mike McCarthy and general manager Ted Thompson discussed their options and it was best for all involved that Grant go on injured reserve.

"I don't regret that at all because my ankle is fine now," Grant said. "They didn't want to take any chances. They said I had a lot of football left. Who knows what would have happened? Say I got out there and I wasn't ready to go? And I'm trying to play and now I'm putting bad film out there."

Without a crystal ball, no one knew then that going on IR meant Grant would miss out on Green Bay's history-making run as a sixth-seeded, road-warrior playoff team that marched all the way to Super Bowl XLV.

But before that march, the Packers stumbled sometimes. Without Grant, the Packers tried to fool defenses with a faux running game. Then rookie James Starks got himself off the physically unable to perform list and out of McCarthy's doghouse with good practice habits.

Starks had 101 yards in three regular-season games and 315 yards in the playoff run.

Is there room for Grant and Starks together in an aerial-driven offense piloted by Aaron Rodgers?

Two-back systems have been successful in recent years in Dallas, Chicago and with the New York Jets. If that's what ends up being the best approach for Green Bay, "I'm all for it," Grant said.

"James is already ready. He proved that last year," Grant added. "And James has done something that I haven't done. . . "

If it means sharing snaps with Starks in practice, fine, Grant said. He'll get game-ready with what he gets. If it means sharing carries with Starks in a game, fine, Grant said. There were games he had to make do with 10 carries anyway.

He'll agree to anything.

He has to play in a Super Bowl.

"The only thing better than one ring is two," Grant said. "How can you be complacent when they win a Super Bowl and you're not a part of it?"

That's why Grant never had a breaking point during the long year off filled with rehabilitation.

Every day began at 9 a.m. with rehab and workouts until 1 p.m. Every day ended with workouts at 5 p.m. and rehab on the fatigued ankle until 8 p.m.

He'd run, lift weights and do drills to increase his running power, speed and explosion. He'd run again. He made sure his ankle was as ready to work at night as it was in the morning, because the body changes as the day wears on.

He's 219 pounds now and probably more, he figures, because the Packers aren't having two-a-day practices.

The Packers obviously believe in Grant's potential for a comeback. They didn't cut him - a fear every player has.

"If they can do it to somebody we don't speak of, they can do it to anybody in this league," said Grant, referring to Brett Favre.

The Packers paid Grant his $1.75 million roster bonus, which was due the first week of the league year. Grant saw that move as an act of faith on Green Bay's part. He won't turn 29 until December, he's got a lot less tread on his tires than other running backs and he said the year away revived his whole body.

Grant is determined to validate the decision-makers.

And to insert himself in a memory. It wasn't the Super Bowl that got to him. He was there on the sideline, a spectator with a pass instead of a jersey - but at least he was there.

No, it was the locker room ecstatic with veterans Mark Tauscher, Donald Driver and Charles Woodson after the Packers beat Chicago in the NFC Championship Game that hurt.

"Seeing the guys like Tausch, Drive, Wood, all the older guys who had tried to get to the Super Bowl their whole career, and not being able to physically help them get there - that was hard," Grant said.

http://www.jsonline.com/sports/packers/126646718.html 

Lori Nickel wrote:


UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
13 years ago
They didn't him, you dumbass. He retired and when he tried to come back, he was traded.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
13 years ago

They didn't him, you dumbass. He retired and when he tried to come back, he was traded.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 



I assume you meant to add 'cut' or 'waive' in there, but I think the point Ryan Grant is saying is if the Packers are willing to cast off (for lack of better wording) the face of the franchise then no one is safe. And I like that line of thinking. Everyone is replaceable.
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
13 years ago
I think that is what he meant too, but it riles people up when it's said that Favre was cut, so I prefer people to be accurate about it.

I like that no one is safe too. It wouldn't bother me if competition were brought in for everyone, including Aaron Rodgers.
UserPostedImage
DakotaT
13 years ago
"You're here as long as it takes to find someone to replace you." Ron Wolf

I'm not confident yet that Ryan Grant is replaced. I need to see more of sample size from Starks. He ran well from a spread formation, but can he bang away at 8 in the box?

Next season's training camp will be when or if Grant is cut.

The Packers have become a machine, and what the fans are going to have to accept is that players do not have automatic longevity. Choose the jerseys you purchase wisely.
UserPostedImage
DoddPower
13 years ago

"You're here as long as it takes to find someone to replace you." Ron Wolf

I'm not confident yet that Ryan Grant is replaced. I need to see more of sample size from Starks. He ran well from a spread formation, but can he bang away at 8 in the box?

Next season's training camp will be when or if Grant is cut.

The Packers have become a machine, and what the fans are going to have to accept is that players do not have automatic longevity. Choose the jerseys you purchase wisely.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 




While I agree with your overall premise, I can't imagine us seeing many 8 in the box formations. I certainly hope so, but I don't think teams have the balls to do so, with the obvious exception being the later parts of every game when we're up 8 scores. 😉
Zero2Cool
13 years ago

While I agree with your overall premise, I can't imagine us seeing many 8 in the box formations. I certainly hope so, but I don't think teams have the balls to do so, with the obvious exception being the later parts of every game when we're up 8 scores. ;-)

Originally Posted by: doddpower 



8 in the box and we'll witness Aaron Rodgers, Greg Jennings, James Jones, Jermichael Finley, and Jordy Nelson cream themselves live on TV simultaneously.
UserPostedImage
DoddPower
13 years ago

8 in the box and we'll witness Aaron Rodgers, Greg Jennings, James Jones, Jermichael Finley, and Jordy Nelson cream themselves live on TV simultaneously.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Exactly my point. 🙂
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (7h) : DOINKED IN FOR THE WIN!!!!!
Mucky Tundra (7h) : Cardiac Commanders
TheKanataThrilla (10h) : Don't like that call Washtington on 4th down
TheKanataThrilla (17h) : The Bills really need to improve their D. The have the ability to score at will, but if they stumble this D will not save them.
Zero2Cool (18h) : LET'S GO
Mucky Tundra (12-Jan) : Blocked PAT returned for 2; not something you see often
Mucky Tundra (12-Jan) : After a strong start, Herbert playing like ass
Mucky Tundra (11-Jan) : Oh god, that means the Clifford stans will come back out of the woodwork
Zero2Cool (11-Jan) : Fills the openin they had
buckeyepackfan (11-Jan) : Sean Clifford signed to 53 man roster.
Martha Careful (11-Jan) : Two terrific NCAA Football Semi-Final Games...We can only hope the Championship game is as good
Zero2Cool (10-Jan) : Eagles WR DeVonta Smith will be a DNP in today’s practice. He’s dealing with back tightness. But the expectation is that he’ll play Sunday.
Zero2Cool (10-Jan) : Jalen Hurts has cleared the concussion protocol. He’s playing Sunday.
Zero2Cool (10-Jan) : 𝕏avier McKinney First Team All-Pro
Zero2Cool (10-Jan) : NFL moves Vikings-Rams playoff tilt to Arizona due to fires
Zero2Cool (10-Jan) : Rams lose home field advantage for Monday game.
Mucky Tundra (9-Jan) : Notre Lame=Notre Dame, Luckeyes=Ohio State, Pedo St=Penn St
Zero2Cool (9-Jan) : ... It clearly was not what we were supposed to be in, certainly."
Zero2Cool (9-Jan) : Hafley says 3rd and 11 call there was a miscommunication.
Zero2Cool (9-Jan) : The only team I know is Texas from that. Who are the other three?
Mucky Tundra (9-Jan) : Notre Lame vs Pedo St tonight and the Luckeyes vs Texas tomorrow
Mucky Tundra (9-Jan) : Stud
Zero2Cool (9-Jan) : E. Cooper. Rookie of Month. Defense.
Mucky Tundra (8-Jan) : @AaronNagler · 2m Both Jordan Love and Malik Willis were Limited participants at Packers practice today.
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : Johnson didn't make it until 2020. Ring 2023. 🤷 Personally, he should have been in years prior to Hall.
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : HUMP DAY
beast (8-Jan) : Guys that have a good shot at making the NFL Hall of Fame usually get into their teams pretty fast
beast (8-Jan) : Yeah, but is Kampman and the others in the NFL Hall of Fame?
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : Johnson was Hall of Fame, 2020. Should haev been in Ring a year later, not three years.
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : I could be wrong there though
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : Guys like Kampman, Tim Harris, Al Harris, etc all over 15 years. Hall of Fame is 5 year wait
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : I guess I see players in Packers Hall come way later
beast (8-Jan) : Yeah, usually teams hall of fames are a much lower bar than the NFL
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : is it uncommon for Hall before Ring?
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : S Xavier McKinney named first-team All-Pro by NFLPA
beast (8-Jan) : I missed it, sorry, but he got into the NFL Hall of Fame years before that
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : Jones took his sweet ole time!
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : Yeah, he's in the ring of honor, just saw video and his name is up there
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : Didn't they have a thing in 2023 for Jimmy's ring of honor? I swear I saw it
beast (8-Jan) : Though if they're legitimately trying to re-sign MM, then it makes sense.
beast (8-Jan) : Jerry Jones still hasn't put Jimmy Johnson in the Ring of Honor, but he's in the NFL's Hall of Fame, Jones is petty
Mucky Tundra (8-Jan) : Unless the Cowboys are planning an extension, seems kinda petty
beast (8-Jan) : Cowboys denied Bears request
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : From what I'm reading, MM is under contract through the 14th of January; after that he's free game
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : McCarthy let go or not extended??
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Chicago Bears have asked the Dallas Cowboys permission to interview Mike McCarthy for head coaching vacancy
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : The winners page that is
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : I was not hoping for that. It messes up the page lol
beast (6-Jan) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3.
beast (6-Jan) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

11-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

10-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

9-Jan / Around The NFL / beast

9-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

9-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

8-Jan / Around The NFL / beast

7-Jan / Fantasy Sports Talk / wpr

7-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

7-Jan / Fantasy Sports Talk / Zero2Cool

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.