Pack93z
  • Pack93z
  • Select Member Topic Starter
13 years ago
Personally.. if I as a rider take responsibility and waive any responsibility from the park, I don't see any reason not allow me upon the ride. 



Now.. I don't know the elements of this particular ride.. but there is something to be said for personal responsibility.  His family holds the park not responsible.. so he made a decision... it cost him.






Police: Ride workers knew Iraq vet had no legs



Iraq war veteran Sgt. James T. Hackemer is seen after being awarded a van from proceeds raised by Help Our Military Heroes, March 2011 in Beltsville, Md. (AP/Help Our Military Heroes)



(CBS/AP) 

BATAVIA, N.Y. - Police say the death of a legless Iraq war veteran who was thrown from a roller coaster in upstate New York was an accident but say the man never should have been allowed on the ride and workers violated park policy.



Genesee County Sheriff Gary Maha says signs at the Ride of Steel roller coaster at Darien Lake Theme Park & Resort clearly state riders "must have two legs."




Maha said park operators clearly violated that policy but investigators found no criminal activity, including intent, and they would not face criminal charges. Civil liability could be determined later if a lawsuit is filed, he said.



Sgt. James Hackemer, 29, died Friday when he was thrown from the last -- and second highest -- of three hills on the coaster. He fell about 150 feet and landed on grass.



Video: Tragedy for vet on roller coaster


Maha says Hackemer "didn't have the physical attributes" to hold him in the ride. He says the operators knew he was a double amputee but allowed him aboard anyway.



Hackemer, a father of two from Gowanda, N.Y., lost his right leg below his knee and his left leg at his hip in a roadside bomb explosion while he was deployed in 2008. He suffered two strokes and spent six weeks in a coma, after which he had to relearn to eat and speak. He had been living with his parents.



"It's going to help a little bit that he was happy," his mother, Nancy Hackemer, told The Buffalo News. "We shouldn't have had him for these last three years and four months."



She said the family had recently returned from the Walter Reed Army Medical Center, in Washington, D.C., where her son got "a new set of legs."



"He was assisted onto the ride," she said. "He was doing what he wanted to do."



The park's website describes the Ride of Steel as one of the tallest coasters east of the Mississippi River, climbing 208 feet and reaching speeds in excess of 70 mph.



Amusement park industry consultant Dennis Speigel said two things should be considered when determining whether someone should be allowed on a ride.



"One is rider responsibility and then there is operator responsibility, and those two issues have to homogenize," Speigel said Sunday. "This just seems to me that it was a bad decision on both parts."



Hackemer's relatives have said they don't hold the park responsible for his death.



Although an investigation of the accident is incomplete, Speigel, who is not involved in the probe, wondered whether Hackemer's military service played a role in the decision to allow the ride.



Parks in general are sensitive to the military, he said, with many offering significant discounts and ticket giveaways to service members and their families. As of July 5, since the start of U.S. military operations in Iraq, 32,130 U.S. service members have been wounded in hostile action, according to the Department of Defense's weekly tally.



"Here we have a situation where that individual has seen some pretty incredible things, I would imagine, and if I had to guess, was saying, ]I can ride this. Don't worry about me, I'll be fine.' And then you begin dealing with the forces of physics and it's a whole different situation," said Speigel, a past president of the International Association of Amusement Parks and Attractions, a trade association.



"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Nonstopdrivel
13 years ago
In some ways, the guy was a total dumbass -- at every amusement park I have been to, there are signs clearly posted that say riders must have two legs, and I have seen amputees turned away -- but at least he went out on top. There are worse ways to die.
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
  • Pack93z
  • Select Member Topic Starter
13 years ago

In some ways, the guy was a total dumbass -- at every amusement park I have been to, there are signs clearly posted that say riders must have two legs, and I have seen amputees turned away -- but at least he went out on top. There are worse ways to die.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 





Just got back from Disney and Seaworld.. I was never told once I couldn't ride a ride.. not once. Been to Great America several times, never been turned away.. so what are you trying to say Rourke?



Now.. there are some rides.. the Manta Ray for example.. I used judgement and passed.



But even then.. personal choice and if your willing to risk it and waive liability.. then damn it.. go for it as long as your endangering no one else that is.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Nonstopdrivel
13 years ago
But you are not wheelchair bound. You also have a prosthetic leg, if I am not mistaken. The people I have seen turned away were above-the-knee double amputees. That makes them too short to stay in the ride. Huge difference.
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
  • Pack93z
  • Select Member Topic Starter
13 years ago



She said the family had recently returned from the Walter Reed Army Medical Center, in Washington, D.C., where her son got "a new set of legs."





Do we know he wasn't wearing them?



Either way.. I don't see Mr. Speigel validate his statements and made a general premise that they need two legs.. vague in my opinion.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Nonstopdrivel
13 years ago
Yes, it was recent, which to me indicates that he probably wasn't very adept at their use yet. Obviously, I am just speculating.

I agree with you overall, though. If he wanted to accept responsibility for his actions and take that risk, I have no problem with it. The problem is I highly doubt he signed a waiver, so there will probably still be some civil liability, though I don't think there should be. I think "ride at your own risk," particularly in questionable situations like this, should mean just that. Assuming proper maintenance of the rides and so on.
UserPostedImage
Porforis
13 years ago

Personally.. if I as a rider take responsibility and waive any responsibility from the park, I don't see any reason not allow me upon the ride.

Originally Posted by: Pack93z 



If you fall off and die it's bad publicity for your operation and thus lost revenue. Also, I'm sure they shut the place down for at least a little bit if not a day or more. Also, what about kids that saw a person die? Grown adults seeing their first dead body? What if the falling person strikes a person on the ground and kills them? You fly off and die, you're not the only person that's hurt.
Pack93z
  • Pack93z
  • Select Member Topic Starter
13 years ago

If you fall off and die it's bad publicity for your operation and thus lost revenue. Also, I'm sure they shut the place down for at least a little bit if not a day or more. Also, what about kids that saw a person die? Grown adults seeing their first dead body? What if the falling person strikes a person on the ground and kills them? You fly off and die, you're not the only person that's hurt.

Originally Posted by: Porforis 





So I am to believe that there is more risk to a compromised adult than that of a child greater than x inches?



Because all of the same scenarios listed above would apply the same if not great to a child whom can't in any fashion give their legal consent.



I don't know the makeup of this ride.. but one would have to believe the risks are increased for all riders vs another ride or another activity. So there is some assumed risk in having the ride in the first place.. thus opening yourself as the park to the above circumstances by default.



That said.. I believe there is a certain rule of common sense that should be applied.. but that doesn't cover the cookie cutter approach that was given by the consultant (whom is not actively involved in the accident investigation).. at least in my opinion.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Porforis
13 years ago

So I am to believe that there is more risk to a compromised adult than that of a child greater than x inches?

Because all of the same scenarios listed above would apply the same if not great to a child whom can't in any fashion give their legal consent.

I don't know the makeup of this ride.. but one would have to believe the risks are increased for all riders vs another ride or another activity. So there is some assumed risk in having the ride in the first place.. thus opening yourself as the park to the above circumstances by default.

That said.. I believe there is a certain rule of common sense that should be applied.. but that doesn't cover the cookie cutter approach that was given by the consultant (whom is not actively involved in the accident investigation).. at least in my opinion.

Originally Posted by: Pack93z 



I agree that it absolutely sucks for the amputee in this situation... You can't be expected to live a completely dull life for fear of a freak accident hurting yourself and others. On the other hand, having legs DOES result in being able to be more secure when strapped into a roller coaster seat. Assuming the harnesses are designed to be used with children, I don't see how children wouldn't be dramatically safer that position. If you're going to slide out of a harness, you're going to slide up and out. With legs, you have something to prevent your upper body from sliding out.

That being said, it would be nice to see harnesses that bring amputees to the same level of safety as everyone else when it comes to zipping around at 40MPH strapped to a seat. Rules really do need to be strict and inflexible... If you want to pick and choose when to enforce them based on the spirit behind the rules that's fine, but when tragedy strikes, someone's going to get the blame... Bottom line, these safety rules are in place to protect not just the riders but the businesses from lawsuits and lost revenue... Too bad they can't use this fear of lost revenue to make rides more handicap-accessible and safe.
Formo
13 years ago
So many mixed emotions with this story. I guess the strongest one I have is: He could have died in Iraq, but didn't.. Instead he probably died with a smile on his face having some damn fun. I pray every night that's how I get to go.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (18h) : Packers. 🤦
Zero2Cool (18h) : One team.
Zero2Cool (18h) : One team petition NFL to ban Brotherly Shove.
beast (23-Feb) : Seems like he was just pissed because he was no longer the starter
beast (23-Feb) : Campbell is right, he's rich and he doesn't have to explain sh!t... but that attitude gives teams reasons to never sign him again.
dfosterf (22-Feb) : I have some doubt about all that
dfosterf (22-Feb) : I read De'Vondre Campbell's tweet this morning (via the New York Post) Florio says that if he invested his earnings wisely, he will be good
beast (20-Feb) : I haven't followed, but I believe he's good when healthy, just hasn't been able to stay healthy.
dfosterf (20-Feb) : Hasn"t Bosa missed more games than he has played in the last 3 years?
Mucky Tundra (19-Feb) : He hasn't been too bad when healthy but I don't feel like I ever heard much about when he is
Zero2Cool (19-Feb) : Felt like he was more interested in his body, than football. He flashed more than I expected
Zero2Cool (19-Feb) : When he was coming out, I thought he'd be flash in pan.
Mucky Tundra (19-Feb) : Joey seems so forgettable compared to his brother for some reason
Zero2Cool (19-Feb) : NFL informed teams today that the 2025 salary cap will be roughly $277.5M-$281.5M
Zero2Cool (19-Feb) : Los Angeles Chargers are likely to release DE Joey Bosa this off-season as a cap casualty, per league source.
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : If the exploit is not fixed, we'll see tons of "50 top free agents, 50 perfect NFL team fits: We picked where each should sign in March" lo
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Issue should be solved, database cleaned and held strong working / meeting. Boom!
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : It should be halted now.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : usually spambots are trying to get traffic to shady websites filled with spyware; the two links being spammed were to the Packers website
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : you know when you put it that way combined with the links it was spamming (to the official Packers website)
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Yep. You can do that with holding down ENTER on a command in Console of browser
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : even with the rapid fire posts?
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : I'm not certain it's a bot.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : I've got to go to work soon which is a pity because I'm enthralled by this battle between the bot and Zero
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Yeah, I see what that did. Kind of funny.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : now it's a link to Wes Hodkiezwicz mailbag
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Now they're back with another topic
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : oh lol
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : I have a script that purges them now.
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : 118 Topics with Message.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : what's 118 (besides a number)?
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : They got 118 slapped in there.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : that's why it confused the hell out of me
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Yeah, but this is taking a headline and slapping it into the Packers Talk
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Wasnt there a time guests could post in the help forum?
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : lol good question, kind of impressed!
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : So how is a guest posting?
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Tell them its an emergency
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Working. Meetings.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Lots of fun; the spam goes back 4 or 5 pages by this point
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : I thought you'd look for yourself and put 2 and 2 together lol. I overestimated ya ;)
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : I thought Guests couldnt post?
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : And gosh that's gonna be fun to clean up! hahaa
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Oh. Why not just say that then? Geez.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : check the main forum, seems a spam bot is running amok
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : What?
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Is the Packers online game "Packers Predict" now available for 2024? I can't tell
Zero2Cool (17-Feb) : Bengals planning to Franchise Tag Tamaurice Higgins
Zero2Cool (14-Feb) : Packers are hiring Luke Getsy as senior offensive assistant.
Martha Careful (12-Feb) : I would love to have them both, esp. Crosby, but either might be too expensive.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

24-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

22-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

19-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / MintBaconDrivel

18-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

18-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

18-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

18-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Feb / Around The NFL / beast

16-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

15-Feb / Around The NFL / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.