if brett favre is so good,then why didn't we trade for a solid first round?

---

No one will trade a first rounder for a 38-year-old player.

---

Wrong section for this guys, but to remark on your comment is there were people willing to give a 1st rounder but Ted Thompson didn't want Brett in the smae division.

---

Well if jets make it to the SB, it will be a first ... if they make it to playoffs it's a second rounder, I think we're all ready guaranteed a 3rd rounder until now.

So I know jets won't make it SB, so we're probably getting a 2nd at the most.

---

Would have been interesting to see what NE would have gave after Bradys injury ?

---

if they beat the titans 2day, will your opinion change?

---

and the idiot GM will more than likely trade it for 2 5th rounders , or draft another justin harrell or brian brohm

---

It would have been high. Brett would have been in his glory. Probably won a Superbowl and retired on the Top Of His Game... and Go Down in history as The Greatest. No questions asked.

---

Re Sig....

Sorry for your loss.

Serious. I like Texas Tech. I was rooting for them to win.

---

If you look at the strict numbers of it, no, not a good trade. But when you consider everything into this (which many have great difficulty doing) it was good for THREE parties. It was good for Brett (he is with a GM he can "trust" as he "claims" he couldnt do with Ted), It will work out good for the Packers to get an extra draft pick for a player who had retired during the off season and it worked out pretty well for Chad Pennington and his team, the Dolphins.


As per the trade. I'd bet my left testicle that we trade it into more picks. Not because its Ted's "thing", but because that pick will be compared to Brett for years.

---