Should The Packers Re-Sign All Their Unrestricted Free Agents?· Page 2

Dexter_Sinister
Registered

13 years ago

Cutting Jackson before you know if Green can make the transition to the Pro game would be kind of reckless.

Why gamble when you can hedge your bets.

I really like Green's 8.7 per in college, and have no attachment to Jackson. But we need to be sure before we get rid of known producers.

Bird in the hand.

I want to go out like my Grandpa did. Peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming in terror like his passengers.

DakotaT
Select Member

13 years ago

#12

You render me more superfluous and redundant everyday, good sir.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel

Doubtful. Wish I had more time in the day to read all your articles.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

13 years ago

#13

Doubtful. Wish I had more time in the day to read all your articles.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT

If they are inked by Rourke, better get your dictionary ready.

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

13 years ago

#14

Or Starks.

Originally Posted by: Rockmolder

The last time I watched the Super Bowl, I focused specifically on the play of the offensive line and Starks. I think Starks did a pretty decent job picking up blitzes in the big game, particularly since the line couldn't hold back the blitz for anything. I am looking forward to seeing how he develops. With the return of Grant this year, it is likely that Starks will be relegated to a 3rd-down role, at least to start the season, so hopefully they will focus on developing his skills as a blocker and pass catcher. He has certainly shown some promise in both departments.

Yerko
Senior Member

13 years ago

#15

Dude signed with Drew Rosenhaus. He's gone.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

This. Signed with the scum of all NFL Agents....percentage should now go from 30% to .05%

SINCITYCHEEZE
Senior Member

13 years ago

#16

Don't understanding the B. Jackson love from Packer fans and probably never will. 2nd round draft pick waste if you ask me. His greatest quality is blocking? WTF? The kid has absolutley no vision running from scrimmage. He was billed a zone blocking scheme running back. Well, he's had ample opportunity to prove that and failed miserably. Good riddance, if it were up to me he could start packing his bags right now.

We are however, indepted to B-Jackson for Urlacher losing his jock strap on a frozen Soldier Field in the most important game of the rivalry's history.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT

Jackson a waste pick?Me thinks not.I finally re-watched the Super bowl for the first time.,(Thanks for that vid in the super bowl thread Nonstop.),I saw on more than a few plays where Starks whiffed on his blitz pickups and Aaron almost got killed.
Guys like Jennings,Finley,Starks,and Nelson may keep Rogers on the Sports page,guys like Jackson keep him off the Obituary page.

Yes the jock juke play will forever be one of my favorite Packer/Bear moments.

Wisconsin Born, Packer Bred

zombieslayer
Registered

13 years ago

#17

Insert Green.

Or Starks. I mean, in between being Emmitt Smith and Barry Sanders combined, I bet he still has some time to catch a ball or two on 3rd down, or throw some DEs around Reggie White vs Cris Carter style.

Originally Posted by: Rockmolder

Well, Rock, it was nice knowing you. (Kevin's going to kick you off the site). 😉

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (2h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (2h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (2h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (2h) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (2h) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (2h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (2h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (2h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (3h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (3h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (3h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (3h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (4h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (4h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (4h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (4h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (4h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (5h) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (5h) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (5h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (5h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (5h) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (6h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (7h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (7h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (8h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (8h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (8h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (8h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (8h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (8h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (8h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (8h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (8h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (8h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (8h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (8h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (8h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (8h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (8h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (8h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (9h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (9h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (9h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (9h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (9h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (9h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

packerfanoutwest (9h) : falcons are already ahead of us

beast (9h) : Packers will get in

beast (9h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS