nerdmann
13 years ago
http://www.totalpackers.com/2011/06/18/mason-crosby-vs-ryan-longwell/ 

Although the Green Bay Packers have given every indication they plan to re-sign kicker Mason Crosby, who will be a free agent when the lockout ends, things don’t always go according to plan.

It’s conceivable, although probably not likely, another team will do something to pry Crosby away from the Packers. In that scenario, the team may be forced to turn to a familiar face — former kicker Ryan Longwell, who’s spent the last five seasons with the Minnesota Vikings and will be a free agent himself.

Interestingly, Longwell didn’t rule out a return to Green Bay when posed the question.

Appearing Friday morning on ESPNMilwaukee.com, Longwell made clear he intends to play in 2011 and said he “wouldn’t mind going back” to the Vikings. Asked if he would consider returning to Green Bay if Packers place-kicker Mason Crosby moves on in free agency, Longwell laughed and said: “You never say never. You just don’t know.”

What’s perhaps more interesting than the possibility of Longwell returning to the Packers is the career arc of the two men in question.

Longwell was a pretty good kicker during his nine years in Green Bay, but he’s become even better since leaving the team in 2006. His field goal percentage has increased in each of the past four seasons. In 2010, he made a career-high 94 percent of his kicks (17 of 18) and has a career percentage of 83.5.

Crosby, on the other hand, has been fairly mediocre since coming to the Packers in 2007. His field goal percentage decreased each of his first three seasons with the Packers, resulting in a below-average 75 percent in 2009, before he rebounded to hit 78.6 percent of his kicks in 2010. In his career, Crosby has made 78.1 percent of his kicks.

Of course, other than their accuracy, the biggest difference between Longwell and Crosby is age. Longwell turns 37 in August, while Crosby turns 27 in September.

So, who would you rather have?

TP wrote:


“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Nonstopdrivel
13 years ago
There are few things you can count on in life, but one thing you can count on: If there is a popular ex-Packer on another team's roster, someone will write an article about the possibility of him coming back to the Packers.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
13 years ago

There are few things you can count on in life, but one thing you can count on: If there is a popular ex-Packer on another team's roster, someone will write an article about the possibility of him coming back to the Packers.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 



And your thoughts on said topic are???


Ryan Longwell is a better FG kicker, especially when he's only asked to twice kick a FG longer than 40 yards in a controlled climate, such as his Viking dome.

I don't want him back because the Packers would then have to find a kickoff specialist.


UserPostedImage
yooperfan
13 years ago
I'll take Crosby being younger with a live leg and room to improve providing he has a consistant holder.
Longwell, although a very good placekicker, is on the downward slope considering his age. Even in his prime his kickoffs used to put me right over the edge.
azrunning
13 years ago
Crosby definitely. Better leg and doesn't complain about the holders/weather like longwell did when he was here. Also, it's hard for me to get over ex-packers defecting to the vikings.
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
Greg C.
13 years ago
Crosby is good enough to keep but not good enough to get a big offer from someone else, so he will probably be back. Longwell is a better kicker, though--one of the best in the league--so it would be great to have him back if that's how things worked out. His short kickoffs didn't bother me too much. He kicked directionally with decent hangtime, so I don't think his kickoffs cost the team much field position, if any. Kicking field goals is way more important, and he was among the best in the league at that, even when he was kicking in the elements at Green Bay.
blank
earthquake
13 years ago
36 year old kicker that has only really been excellent since he started playing in a dome, plus you would have to have another kicker handle kickoffs? Not a chance in hell. If Crosby walks, 2-3 young undrafted/street FA kickers or will be brought in to compete.

Longwell has excellent stats, because he's rarely ever asked to kick from over 49 yards out, Crosby is regularly doing hail-marry 56 yard kicks, it makes him look worse statistically. In the 4 years crosby has been in the league, he has kicked 21 from 50+, in the 5 years longwell has been with the vikes, he's only kicked 14 from 50+. 18 of Crosby's 28 kicks were from 40+ on the other hand, most of which were outdoors, thats 65% of his kicks.

Longwells 94% accuracy looks amazing last year, but when you look at his stats, he had 0 from 50+, and only TWO from 40+. Roughly 90% of his kicks were 0-39 yards, IN A DOME. You would have to be a terrible kicker to look bad in that situation.

In the last four years, Longwell has scored 276 points off field goals, and Crosby has scored 321. Points win games, not field goal %.
blank
beast
13 years ago
"There are lies, damned lies and statistics"

That's the phase this article reminds me of. First off when Longwell laughed is sounded like he knew it didn't have a chance of happening. But let me give some more honest and in depth good stats.

And I expect to prove the reason Longwell kicking % is so high is because he normally kicks indoors and they play safe (inside the 40) kicks with him.

As well as prove Crosby has been the opposite way, playing almost all of his kicks happened outside in 2010 and MM takes risk and tries kicking from further a lot more often.

..............................

How many kicks (and what percentage) were kicked outdoors last year?

Crosby had 25 of 28 (89.28%) of his kicks outdoors.
Longwell had 7 of 18 (38.88%) of his kicks outdoors.
So Crosby has to deal with weather a lot more

.....................................

Now lets look at where Longwell makes his money... inside the 40.

Longwell is 15 of 16 (93.75%) inside the 40.
Crosby is 12 of 14 (85.71) inside the 40.

In other words Crosby had to deal with the a lot more weather and still only missed one more kick inside the 40.

.....................................
What about the 40+ long distance ones?

Longwell had only 2 kicks over 40 yards (41 and 48) and made them both.
Crosby had 14 kicks over 40 yards including 4 over 50. He missed two between the 40 and 50 and two over 50.
So Crosby is 8 of 10 between 40 and 50. And 2 of 4 over 50. So overall Crosby was 10 of 14 over 40.

Again Crosby had a lot more difficult kicks.

.....................................

If you look at Crosby stats over the years. Inside the 40 he's been pretty good. It's those over 40 and over 50 ones MM likes to go for that kills Crosby kicking %.

Crosby stats.
http://espn.go.com/nfl/player/splits/_/id/10636/mason-crosby 

Longwell stats.
http://espn.go.com/nfl/player/splits/_/id/1328/ryan-longwell 
UserPostedImage
mi_keys
13 years ago

"There are lies, damned lies and statistics"

That's the phase this article reminds me of. First off when Longwell laughed is sounded like he knew it didn't have a chance of happening. But let me give some more honest and in depth good stats.

And I expect to prove the reason Longwell kicking % is so high is because he normally kicks indoors and they play safe (inside the 40) kicks with him.

As well as prove Crosby has been the opposite way, playing almost all of his kicks happened outside in 2010 and MM takes risk and tries kicking from further a lot more often.

..............................

How many kicks (and what percentage) were kicked outdoors last year?

Crosby had 25 of 28 (89.28%) of his kicks outdoors.
Longwell had 7 of 18 (38.88%) of his kicks outdoors.
So Crosby has to deal with weather a lot more

.....................................

Now lets look at where Longwell makes his money... inside the 40.

Longwell is 15 of 16 (93.75%) inside the 40.
Crosby is 12 of 14 (85.71) inside the 40.

In other words Crosby had to deal with the a lot more weather and still only missed one more kick inside the 40.

.....................................
What about the 40+ long distance ones?

Longwell had only 2 kicks over 40 yards (41 and 48) and made them both.
Crosby had 14 kicks over 40 yards including 4 over 50. He missed two between the 40 and 50 and two over 50.
So Crosby is 8 of 10 between 40 and 50. And 2 of 4 over 50. So overall Crosby was 10 of 14 over 40.

Again Crosby had a lot more difficult kicks.

.....................................

If you look at Crosby stats over the years. Inside the 40 he's been pretty good. It's those over 40 and over 50 ones MM likes to go for that kills Crosby kicking %.

Crosby stats.
http://espn.go.com/nfl/player/splits/_/id/10636/mason-crosby 

Longwell stats.
http://espn.go.com/nfl/player/splits/_/id/1328/ryan-longwell 

Originally Posted by: beast 





Nice work. Usually, you want to see your kicker over that 80% threshold but when you see that he would be but for attempting 4 kicks over 50 yards I'd say he's doing an acceptable job. He has had a turnstile at holder and has been kicking in bad weather. The weather probably isn't getting better any time soon but we might see the holder position solidified with Masthay.

Born and bred a cheesehead
Yerko
13 years ago
Like comparing apples to oranges...Crosby in a heartbeat (now). Better kicker in outdoor situations and a stronger leg. Longwell's percentage has only gone up the past 4 years because he was spoon-fed controlled climate kicks under 40 yards.

UserPostedImage
Similar Topics
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    Zero2Cool (17h) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
    dfosterf (20h) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
    dfosterf (20h) : Trade, cut or keep
    dfosterf (22h) : that from Jaire
    dfosterf (22h) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
    Zero2Cool (22h) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
    dfosterf (22h) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
    Zero2Cool (22h) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
    dfosterf (22h) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
    dfosterf (22h) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
    dfosterf (22h) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
    dfosterf (22h) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
    Zero2Cool (22h) : That someone ... likely the agent.
    Zero2Cool (22h) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
    Zero2Cool (22h) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
    Zero2Cool (23h) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
    Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
    Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
    Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
    Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
    dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
    dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
    Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
    dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
    dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
    Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
    dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
    Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what
    Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife
    Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately
    Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.
    dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.
    Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not
    Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.
    Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Guessing they probably knew. Did he have cast or something on?
    Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : Did they know that at the time or was that something the realized afterwards?
    Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Van Ness played most of season with broken thumb
    wpr (9-Apr) : yay
    Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Mark Murphy says Steelers likely to protect Packers game. Meaning, no Ireland
    Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Struggling to figure out what text editor options are needed and which are 'nice to have'
    Mucky Tundra (8-Apr) : *CHOMP CHOMP CHOMP*
    Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : WR who said he'd break Xavier Worthy 40 time...and ran slower than you
    Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Who?
    Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Texas’ WR Isaiah Bond is scheduled to visit the Bills, Browns, Chiefs, Falcons, Packers and Titans starting next week.
    Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Spotting ball isn't changing, only measuring distance is, Which wasn't the issue.
    Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : The spotting of the ball IS the issue. Not the chain gang.
    Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Will there be a tracker on the ball or something?
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
    Vikings
    Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
    Eagles
    Recent Topics
    10h / Random Babble / bboystyle

    23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    15-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

    13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

    11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

    2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    29-Mar / Random Babble / wpr

    28-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    26-Mar / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.