I've been watching Polamalu for years and in most games the guy is all over the field making plays. I've never heard anyone criticize him for a lack of cover skills. Then on one play in the Super Bowl he has to defend half of the end zone one-on-one against Greg Jennings while playing with an injury and now he has bad coverage skills. I know you are basing your opinion on more than that, but that seems to be the play most people have in mind.
I also don't buy your statement that Polamalu's style of play is outdated. If he's so easy to exploit, why did the Steelers have the #1 defense in the league, with Polamalu as their main playmaker? He can rush the passer, put big hits on receivers, and intercept passes, sometimes far downfield. He's a hybrid type of player, sort of like Charles Woodson, but in a slightly different way.
This revisionist history stuff goes way too far sometimes.
Originally Posted by: Greg C.
The Steelers had the No. 1 defense because their front seven attacks the line of scrimmage better than any defense in football.
Woodson can cover the slot and he can do it well. Polamalu cannot. Polamalu is dangerous when he's able to roam the field. Call him a Joker or ace in the hole. That is what makes him an effective player.
Forcing him into coverage takes him out of his comfort zone. He isn't as bad as Atari Bigby in that field. I'm not saying that, but he isn't as good in coverage as his hype would lead you to believe. Now, that is one aspect of his game, but the NFL is shifting. Teams are passing on in the box safeties in exchange for coverage. That is why the Packers took Morgan Burnett and it is why (among other things) Taylor Mays fell in the draft in 2010.
Polamalu won defensive player of the year because of his play against the Baltimore Ravens and Joe Flacco in that Sunday night football contest. Flacco is not an elite QB. When faced with an elite QB, Polamalu’s weakness is exposed.
Brady, Brees, and Rodgers both had their way with the Pittsburgh defense and Brady and Rodgers both attacked the middle of the field. They did not shy away from Polamalu. Flacco and every other QB on the Pittsburgh 2010 schedule do not have the ability to attack a defense as those three can. Personally, I think very few can.
I don’t want anyone to think that I believe Polamalu is the most overrated player in the league. I think he's a great player and is a Hall of Famer. I just don't think he was as strong last season as he was in year's past, especially 2008. I was agreeing more with Prisco's team-by-team analysis. Still, Prisco makes two points about Polamalu that I think are accurate.
1. The league is a pass happy and great offenses spread defenses out.
2. Polamula’s achilles heel is his coverage.
That doesn’t go together exactly like peanut butter and jelly.