wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
13 years ago

Overrated-underrated: Polamalu can't cover; Pack's Williams can 

I put the GB over-under in the past. Go to CBS site to read the other teams O-U.

They love the signature hair flying out from his helmet. They love the highlight hits that make the fools on some four-letter network swoon and yell "jacked up."

They love his name. They love his game.

Troy Polamalu is an NFL darling.

He's also the league's most-overrated player.

There, I said it.

He was selected as the NFL's Defensive Player of the Year in 2010 -- an award I couldn't figure out -- and then disappeared in the playoffs, even getting trucked by Ray Rice of the Ravens in the playoffs.

He was a spinning top in the Super Bowl, trying to cover Packers receivers and instead watched them rip off big gains and two touchdowns on his watch.

The Packers exposed the reason I think Polamalu is overrated. He isn't great in coverage and the NFL is now a cover game.

He's a good player. He's just not great.

I've always believed he was a gambler in the back end, and good teams and smart quarterbacks could take advantage of his aggressive style, which the Packers and Aaron Rodgers did. He gets away with it against bad quarterbacks, but good ones can use his aggressive style to their advantage (See Tom Brady).

They say Polamalu had a groin issue in the playoffs, but if you're on the field, you're healthy enough to take the heat. And haven't injuries been an issue for him the past five seasons? He has played 16 games only once in five years.

That has to mean something in the rating game, doesn't it?

He's good. I just don't think he's great. That makes him overrated. I bet even some Steelers fans would concur after the playoffs.

So who's the league's most underrated?

The honor goes to a former undrafted player cut by his first team named Tramon Williams. He was the best cover player for the Super Bowl champs last year, even though most would assume it was Charles Woodson.

Talk to scouts, personnel people and even members of the Packers coaching staff and they'll all say that it's Williams who is now the better cover player. Woodson is still a ball-hawking playmaker, but he isn't the cover corner Williams is at this point in his career.

Yet Williams didn't go to the Pro Bowl.

Williams isn't mentioned on many lists as one of the top 10 corners in the game.

Williams gets slighted more than he gets beat.

That makes him the NFL's most underrated player.

Coverage is key now. That's why Williams is underrated and why Polamalu is overrated.



Green Bay Packers


Overrated: S Nick Collins. He is a good tackler, but he has trouble in coverage at times. There's no way he should have been All-Pro last season.

Underrated: Tramon Williams. (see above) Want to bet he goes to the Pro Bowl in 2012? He's a great story in perseverance, going from undrafted player, being cut by Houston, then to nickel corner and then to top starter.




UserPostedImage
Greg C.
13 years ago
Wow, this guy's pretty brilliant. He compares safeties to CB's based solely on their coverage skills. And yes, Polamalu was playing hurt in the playoffs and it did affect his performance. Apparently this moron didn't start watching football until January 2011.
blank
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
13 years ago

Wow, this guy's pretty brilliant. He compares safeties to CB's based solely on their coverage skills. And yes, Polamalu was playing hurt in the playoffs and it did affect his performance. Apparently this moron didn't start watching football until January 2011.

Originally Posted by: Greg C. 



I thought he was brilliant dissing Troy and giving wet sloppy kisses to Tramon. I rather enjoyed it. =d>
UserPostedImage
porky88
13 years ago
I actually think most of his statements were spot on.

He is correct in assessing Polamalu's coverage issues and it is a coverage game. Polamalu is a throwback. He's that in the box safety of the 80s and 90s. In today's league, offenses spread the field and exploit that player.

Now, I don’t think he’s just good. He’s a great player, but last year was not one of his better seasons. I personally don’t think he deserved the defensive player of the year award. So by that standard, he’s overrated.
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
13 years ago
your analysis are always interesting Porky.
UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
13 years ago
Whatever. Polamulu will make the Hall of Fame. I'm sure he laughs off the disses.

Guess what? You can beat anyone. We game planned to exploit him. Instead of insulting Troy, how about giving Mike McCarthy credit instead.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Zero2Cool
13 years ago

Whatever. Polamulu will make the Hall of Fame. I'm sure he laughs off the disses.

Guess what? You can beat anyone. We game planned to exploit him. Instead of insulting Troy, how about giving Mike McCarthy credit instead.

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 




The Packers running game is what made Troy Polamulu ineffective. 😰
UserPostedImage
Greg C.
13 years ago

I actually think most of his statements were spot on.

He is correct in assessing Polamalu's coverage issues and it is a coverage game. Polamalu is a throwback. He's that in the box safety of the 80s and 90s. In today's league, offenses spread the field and exploit that player.

Now, I don’t think he’s just good. He’s a great player, but last year was not one of his better seasons. I personally don’t think he deserved the defensive player of the year award. So by that standard, he’s overrated.

Originally Posted by: porky88 



I've been watching Polamalu for years and in most games the guy is all over the field making plays. I've never heard anyone criticize him for a lack of cover skills. Then on one play in the Super Bowl he has to defend half of the end zone one-on-one against Greg Jennings while playing with an injury and now he has bad coverage skills. I know you are basing your opinion on more than that, but that seems to be the play most people have in mind.

I also don't buy your statement that Polamalu's style of play is outdated. If he's so easy to exploit, why did the Steelers have the #1 defense in the league, with Polamalu as their main playmaker? He can rush the passer, put big hits on receivers, and intercept passes, sometimes far downfield. He's a hybrid type of player, sort of like Charles Woodson, but in a slightly different way.

This revisionist history stuff goes way too far sometimes.
blank
porky88
13 years ago

I've been watching Polamalu for years and in most games the guy is all over the field making plays. I've never heard anyone criticize him for a lack of cover skills. Then on one play in the Super Bowl he has to defend half of the end zone one-on-one against Greg Jennings while playing with an injury and now he has bad coverage skills. I know you are basing your opinion on more than that, but that seems to be the play most people have in mind.

I also don't buy your statement that Polamalu's style of play is outdated. If he's so easy to exploit, why did the Steelers have the #1 defense in the league, with Polamalu as their main playmaker? He can rush the passer, put big hits on receivers, and intercept passes, sometimes far downfield. He's a hybrid type of player, sort of like Charles Woodson, but in a slightly different way.

This revisionist history stuff goes way too far sometimes.

Originally Posted by: Greg C. 



The Steelers had the No. 1 defense because their front seven attacks the line of scrimmage better than any defense in football.

Woodson can cover the slot and he can do it well. Polamalu cannot. Polamalu is dangerous when he's able to roam the field. Call him a Joker or ace in the hole. That is what makes him an effective player.

Forcing him into coverage takes him out of his comfort zone. He isn't as bad as Atari Bigby in that field. I'm not saying that, but he isn't as good in coverage as his hype would lead you to believe. Now, that is one aspect of his game, but the NFL is shifting. Teams are passing on in the box safeties in exchange for coverage. That is why the Packers took Morgan Burnett and it is why (among other things) Taylor Mays fell in the draft in 2010.

Polamalu won defensive player of the year because of his play against the Baltimore Ravens and Joe Flacco in that Sunday night football contest. Flacco is not an elite QB. When faced with an elite QB, Polamalu’s weakness is exposed.

Brady, Brees, and Rodgers both had their way with the Pittsburgh defense and Brady and Rodgers both attacked the middle of the field. They did not shy away from Polamalu. Flacco and every other QB on the Pittsburgh 2010 schedule do not have the ability to attack a defense as those three can. Personally, I think very few can.

I don’t want anyone to think that I believe Polamalu is the most overrated player in the league. I think he's a great player and is a Hall of Famer. I just don't think he was as strong last season as he was in year's past, especially 2008. I was agreeing more with Prisco's team-by-team analysis. Still, Prisco makes two points about Polamalu that I think are accurate.

1. The league is a pass happy and great offenses spread defenses out.

2. Polamula’s achilles heel is his coverage.

That doesn’t go together exactly like peanut butter and jelly.
Dexter_Sinister
13 years ago
When Troy doesn't play they lose a lot more than when Ben doesn't play. What does that make Roethlisberger?
I want to go out like my Grandpa did. Peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming in terror like his passengers.
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (6m) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (18m) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (28m) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (48m) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (57m) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (1h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (1h) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (1h) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (1h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (2h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (2h) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (2h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (3h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (3h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (4h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (4h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (4h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (4h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (4h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (4h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (4h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (4h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (4h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (4h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (4h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (4h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (5h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (5h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (5h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (5h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (5h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (5h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (5h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (5h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (5h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
packerfanoutwest (5h) : falcons are already ahead of us
beast (5h) : Packers will get in
beast (5h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
packerfanoutwest (5h) : they still are in the playoffs
packerfanoutwest (5h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
Zero2Cool (7h) : We can say it. We don't play.
Mucky Tundra (8h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
Mucky Tundra (8h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
Mucky Tundra (8h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
buckeyepackfan (9h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
Mucky Tundra (18h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
beast (18h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
bboystyle (18h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
Mucky Tundra (22h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
18m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

45m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

3h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.