Starks should start next season· Page 2

El3ment12
Registered

14 years ago

Starks was great. I would have no problem if either Grant or Starks started though because they will just split carries anyway.

get_louder_at_lambeau
Registered

14 years ago

#12

Seems like the logical thing to do would be to start Grant, and work Starks in. Use them both, let Starks develop as he goes, and ride the hot hand as the season goes.

http://packersnews.net

Dexter_Sinister
Registered

14 years ago

#13

Nerdman,

Nance, 16 games (including playoffs) 3 receptions.

I am guessing Grant could probably beat that since he has 76 receptions in the 39 games he has started. He even had 11 receptions in the 8 games he wasn't the starter.

You can only guess at Nance's potential. We know what Grant, Starks and Jackson can do. All three have show a great deal more than Nance. Why wait for him to develop when you have guys that are capable of producing now. You can't guarantee Nance will develop.

I want to go out like my Grandpa did. Peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming in terror like his passengers.

go.pack.go.
Veteran Member

14 years ago

#14

I don't understand how the writer of this article can say whether or not Starks is going to be special. He saw limited action and missed the whole offseason.

gbguy20
Veteran Member

14 years ago

#15

like i've said in every previous thread about this, it's far too early to label him our starter. discussion about the topic is just silly at this point, imo.

BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.

coltonja
Member

14 years ago

#16

"Dexter_Sinister" wrote:

haha, pwned. I did not know Grant caught that many throws. He always seems to be the runner with BJack catching everything. I like Grant's fit in our O. He is a solid runner, and he has had a few memorable breakaways but I'm with zombie on the need for a passing game rather than an elite Barry Sanders runner. (Sorry, Zero)

Thanks to pack93z for the sig!!!

wpr
Preferred Member

14 years ago

#17

just silly. Grant will be the starter end of story. After 5-6 games if Starks had better stats he will see in increase in carries but Grant will still be considered the starter.

millertime
Member

14 years ago

#18

Nerdmann is the Skip Bayless of PH. But I love the guy cause he at least gives us something to talk about.

wpr
Preferred Member

14 years ago

#19

that analogy was worth a + one miller.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

14 years ago

#20

"coltonja" wrote:

I'm not sure why you're saying sorry to something I stated many times over, but apology accepted. 🙂

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (10m) : Probably not until 10pm will be making pick

dfosterf (1h) : But it is still not tonight. Lol

wpr (1h) : Today is finally here.

dfosterf (2h) : I should have put it in quotes

dfosterf (2h) : It is the title of a you tube video.

dfosterf (2h) : I'm not assuming anything

beast (8h) : If they aren't doing it, then why are you assuming they know how to do it?

dfosterf (14h) : Mackelvie

dfosterf (14h) : Michael Macelvie- NFL teams know how to draft- Why don"t they?

dfosterf (14h) : Youtube

Zero2Cool (19h) : Packers were not selected for the 2025 Hall of Fame game.

dfosterf (21h) : PFOW Out of our division would be a good thing imo

Zero2Cool (22h) : Jameson Williams is done at 24 years old? What? He's a WR, not QB. I'm missing something here haha

wpr (23h) : Tomorrow is almost here.

packerfanoutwest (23h) : would you want him if Pack needed a back up qb?

packerfanoutwest (23h) : JW is done......stick a fork in him

Zero2Cool (23-Apr) : You should. He goes to AFC that helps Packers.

packerfanoutwest (23-Apr) : don't care

Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Lions shopping Jameson Williams?

packerfanoutwest (22-Apr) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.

Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat

wpr (22-Apr) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.

wpr (22-Apr) : now 3

Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Who? What?

beast (22-Apr) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?

Martha Careful (21-Apr) : meh

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast

wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.

wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!

dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am

wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days

beast (18-Apr) : 6 days

wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep

dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire

dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24