macbob
  • macbob
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
14 years ago
http://www.channel3000.com/packers/27468159/detail.html 

GREEN BAY, Wis. Nick Barnett would love to end his NFL career with the Green Bay Packers, although the veteran inside linebacker knows full well that the odds are against that happening.

For now, Barnett would settle for the NFL Players Association and league owners reaching a new collective bargaining agreement so he can figure out exactly what his future holds.

While impending free agents are among the players caught in the middle of the current labor strife, the lockout is also affecting players like Barnett, who are under contract with their current teams but could be on their way out.

Barnett, who turns 30 next month, has two years left on his six-year, $35 million contract, which calls for a $5.5 million base salary in 2011and a $6 million base salary in 2012. He has finished two of the last three seasons on injured reserve, and his replacement last season, Desmond Bishop, earned a four-year, $19.1 million contract after Barnett suffered a season-ending wrist injury Oct. 3 against the Detroit Lions.

Barnett, the teams first-round pick out of Oregon State in 2003, ranks second all-time in team history with 1,010 career tackles, just 10 behind team record holder John Anderson.

Theres a lot of uncertainty to be honest. I am under contract with the Packers two more years, but theres been talk of trades not necessarily directly to me but well see what happens, Barnett said on Green & Gold Today Thursday. I know Ill be playing football. Im probably in the best shape Ive been in in the last three years. And super hungry and excited to play. I would love to finish my career as a packer and retire as a packer and obviously break that record.

Im willing to do a lot of things to be a part of that organization, but its hard to get the dialogue because of the lockout. We cant get anything going, or any conversations, and see where each other stands. Im willing to be a Packer and willing to do a lot of things to do it. But we cant talk, so we dont know where we stand.

Barnetts agent, Chuck Price, attended UCLAs pro day last month, when Packers general manager Ted Thompson was in attendance as well. But the two men werent able to discuss Barnetts situation because the lockout forbids teams from making any roster moves or talking about any players with agents.

Barnett said Thursday that he is 100 percent healed after undergoing surgery in mid-October to insert pins into his right wrist to reattach a tendon he tore off the scaphoid bone.

I would be cleared today, ready to play, Barnett said.

Asked if hes fully on board with the NFLPA during the lockout, Barnett replied, I want us to all meet in the middle, owners and players. Players, we only play for (on average) three years. But when were done, owners keep making money until theyre dead. We put our health on the line, bang our heads. I understand where the owners are coming from, and I understand where the players are coming from. We just need to find a place to meet in the middle where its fair for everybody.

For me, Ive been out since Week 4. So this lockout is really, really moving slow.

Barnett said despite Bishops extension and the re-signing of inside linebacker A.J. Hawk last month, he believes last seasons Super Bowl XLV championship was the direct result of the teams overall depth, and that should be proof that the team needs to keep him. Another inside linebacker, Brandon Chillar, could also be in jeopardy of being released.

We had those same linebackers last year, and what happens if we dont have that type of depth of good linebackers? Barnett said. What happens if they release a couple of us and one gets hurt? Then theyre searching for an inside linebacker. Its all about depth. We made it to the Super Bowl because of depth.

I think the biggest thing theyre worried about is players complaining about playing. If it comes down to that, let the best players play. I dont have any confidence issues. I feel like I can line up and compete with any of those guys and win. I think theyre all great players, but I know I know how to play this game. Ive been playing a long time. Im ready to do whatever.

Barnett also said he didnt think the pre-Super Bowl controversy regarding the team photo in Dallas wouldnt hurt his standing with coach Mike McCarthy and wouldnt be the reason why the team wouldnt bring him back.
I was already sensitive about not playing. Maybe I shouldnt have said anything at all, Barnett said. I dont think it affected our relationship. If that affected our relationship, we had no relationship in the beginning. He knows me, respects me, and I respect him the same way.

If I end up on the Packers, I hope I do, but if I dont, somebodys going to be happy to have me.

Channel3000 wrote:

Stevetarded
14 years ago
I keep imagining Dom Capers adding a 3ILB defense package if Barnett were kept lol.

2 lineman, 3 LB, Clay and Woodson running around doing whatever, and our 4 DBs doing their thing.
blank
Zero2Cool
14 years ago
I added paragraphs because they are your friend!
UserPostedImage
Dexter_Sinister
14 years ago
We would have been pooched without that depth last year. I don't see any reason to go into the next year (whenever that next year will be) with less.

I don't believe getting rid of Barnett is a good idea.
I want to go out like my Grandpa did. Peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming in terror like his passengers.
yooperfan
14 years ago
I loved all those tackles Nick had 3 to 5 yards down field. Impressive with the samurai act, even while getting your ass kicked.
Get rid of him Ted!
DakotaT
14 years ago

We would have been pooched without that depth last year. I don't see any reason to go into the next year (whenever that next year will be) with less.

I don't believe getting rid of Barnett is a good idea.

"Dexter_Sinister" wrote:



Sorry, but you don't pay a guy that kind of coin as a situational linebacker. Besides Samurai Nick doesn't give me any impression that he has the kind of character it takes to accept a backup role on this defense. A fourth round draft pick full of piss and vinegar will do just fine, and we can use the money saved to re-sign Finley, Jorde, or Sitton.
UserPostedImage
millertime
14 years ago



Sorry, but you don't pay a guy that kind of coin as a situational linebacker.

"DakotaT" wrote:



Isn't that what we've been doing with Brandon Chillar the past couple years? I tihnk Barnett is a good player and should be kept for now. A good inside LB might fall to us the later rounds, making Nick more expendable.

Right now, there'd be 0 market for him because teams know we'l probably release him. Our best bet would be to wait until some team loses a LB in training camp. I'd rather get at least something (late round pick) for him than nothing at all.
DakotaT
14 years ago
We owe Nick $11M over the next 2 years. Chiller is no where near that. Put Poppinga on the chopping block too.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
14 years ago
Hawk
Bishop
Matthews
Barnett
Chillar

I think are the top five. I say we let Walden, Zombo and two draft picks or free agents fight out for two more spots.

7 LB'ers enough?
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
14 years ago
It all comes down to what can they get for Nick.
If they can get a 1st or 2nd round pick for him (Not likely) cut him loose.
If they can only get a 5th, 6th or 7th for him keep him.
3rd or 4th (most likely) will probably send him out the door.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
beast (3h) : If they aren't doing it, then why are you assuming they know how to do it?
dfosterf (9h) : Mackelvie
dfosterf (9h) : Michael Macelvie- NFL teams know how to draft- Why don"t they?
dfosterf (9h) : Youtube
Zero2Cool (14h) : Packers were not selected for the 2025 Hall of Fame game.
dfosterf (16h) : PFOW Out of our division would be a good thing imo
Zero2Cool (17h) : Jameson Williams is done at 24 years old? What? He's a WR, not QB. I'm missing something here haha
wpr (18h) : Tomorrow is almost here.
packerfanoutwest (18h) : would you want him if Pack needed a back up qb?
packerfanoutwest (18h) : JW is done......stick a fork in him
Zero2Cool (20h) : You should. He goes to AFC that helps Packers.
packerfanoutwest (23-Apr) : don't care
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Lions shopping Jameson Williams?
packerfanoutwest (22-Apr) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat
wpr (22-Apr) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.
wpr (22-Apr) : now 3
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Who? What?
beast (22-Apr) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
Martha Careful (21-Apr) : meh
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast
wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

19h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Packers Draft Threads / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.