Good Horse (player) to follow

DakotaT
Select Member Topic Starter

13 years ago

lol sorry, Javon was my favorite WR for quite awhile. ;)

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

You have a tendency to back the wrong horse. I knew we were Fd with Javon when he decided to work out with Terrell Owens in the offseason.

Wanna join the discussion?! Login to your PACKERSHOME forum account or Register a new forum account

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

13 years ago

lol sorry, Javon was my favorite WR for quite awhile. ;)

"DakotaT" wrote:

You have a tendency to back the wrong horse. I knew we were Fd with Javon when he decided to work out with Terrell Owens in the offseason.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

What horses have I backed that were wrong? Javon in person was exceptionally polite an well spoken and on the field he had a rare talent of getting the ball in a crowd, similar to Randy Moss.

I'm trying to think of others I've backed that could be claimed as wrong. I'm at a loss.

DakotaT
Select Member Topic Starter

13 years ago

lol sorry, Javon was my favorite WR for quite awhile. ;)

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

You have a tendency to back the wrong horse. I knew we were Fd with Javon when he decided to work out with Terrell Owens in the offseason.

"DakotaT" wrote:

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

You once thought KGB was a great pass rush specialist, until I pointed out he rarely got a sack against quality competition - much like mullet boy in purple.

Greg C.
Registered

13 years ago

lol sorry, Javon was my favorite WR for quite awhile. ;)

"DakotaT" wrote:

You have a tendency to back the wrong horse. I knew we were Fd with Javon when he decided to work out with Terrell Owens in the offseason.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

"DakotaT" wrote:

You once thought KGB was a great pass rush specialist, until I pointed out he rarely got a sack against quality competition - much like mullet boy in purple.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

Holding the Packers career record for sacks has got to count for something.

How many players get sacks against the best left tackles? Not many. They put up almost all of their sack totals on the weaker O-linemen.

blank

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

13 years ago

You once thought KGB was a great pass rush specialist, until I pointed out he rarely got a sack against quality competition - much like mullet boy in purple.

"DakotaT" wrote:

I thought KGB was a very good pass rush specialist for a few years. I don't think that could be nullified.

8
13.5
10
12
13.5

That's not exactly a bad stretch.

You're 0 - 2. Next horse? 🙂

musccy
Veteran Member

13 years ago

You're 0 - 2. Next horse? :)

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

Has anyone mentioned Burt in this thread yet? I think it's about time! 🙂

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

13 years ago

You're 0 - 2. Next horse? :)

"musccy" wrote:

Has anyone mentioned Burt in this thread yet? I think it's about time! :)

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

Probably because no one knows who the hell Burt is.

DakotaT
Select Member Topic Starter

13 years ago

I thought KGB was a very good pass rush specialist for a few years. I don't think that could be nullified.
8
13.5
10
12
13.5
That's not exactly a bad stretch.
You're 0 - 2. Next horse? :)

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

I'm not 0 for shit - expand those stats and list the LT's he faced, and then the LT's that shut his ass down. I remember you specifically thanking me sarcastically for making you look like a jackass on this very subject. It was extensively discussed what a one trick pony good ole KGB was. He was such an awesome pass rusher that they use to just rack up 150 yards a game rushinbg where he forgot his edge setting resposibilities. God dammit, now all I can think of is what a disappointment that era was.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

13 years ago

"DakotaT" wrote:

He was a one trick pony, as I said, I thought he was a good pass rush specialist for a few years and he was. Did I say he was an elite DE? Did I say he was excellent against the run? You know, in fact, I remember specifically saying he was WEAK against the run.

Discussed extensively, so you won't have a problem finding the link to support your comments?

I'd also like to read about the other horses I backed that were wrong. In the beginning of this, I wasn't doubting you, but now after reading this, I'm fairly confident you're full of shit. 🙂

DakotaT
Select Member Topic Starter

13 years ago

#10

I'd also like to read about the other horses I backed that were wrong. In the beginning of this, I wasn't doubting you, but now after reading this, I'm fairly confident you're full of shit. :)

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

What took you so long dumbass, usually it only takes 1 post to know I'm full of shit. 🙂 And he still isn't a pass rush specialist if all he can get sacks on are the Bears shitty o-line. Although the sodomizing of Rex is a picture that will live in infamy. Are we done now?

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (1h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (1h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (1h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (1h) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (1h) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (1h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (1h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (1h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (2h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (3h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (3h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (3h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (3h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (3h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (4h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (4h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (4h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (5h) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (5h) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (5h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (5h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (5h) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (5h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (7h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (7h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (7h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (7h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (8h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (8h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (8h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (8h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (8h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (8h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (8h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (8h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (8h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (8h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (8h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (8h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (8h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (8h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (8h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (8h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (8h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (8h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (8h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (8h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

packerfanoutwest (9h) : falcons are already ahead of us

beast (9h) : Packers will get in

beast (9h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS