Would You Guys Do This Trade?· Page 2

shield4life
Veteran Member Topic Starter

14 years ago

1- 1st round pick - 2nd round pick next year - James Jones or Nelson ... For Larry Fritzgerald.

...

2- 1st round pick this year - 1st round pick next year - 2nd pick the year after that - Aaron Rodgers - Greg Jennings - Finley for ... Cutler - Greg Olsen Devin Hester

I'd probably go for the second one more 😃.

"gbguy20" wrote:

am i reading the second 1 right?

we'd give a 2 1st rounders, 1 2nd rounder, aaron rodgers, greg jennings, and finley

for

cutler, greg olsen, and devin hesteR?

so what youre asking is if we want to downgrade our quarterback, downgrade our wr, and downgrade our tightend for the low low price of 2 1st rounders and a 2nd rounder?

....

Downgrade !!! You call trading for Cutler downgrading ... !!! HOW DARE YOU

......................................

"shield4life" wrote:

Glad To Be A Packers Fan.

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

14 years ago

#12

I know this thread is labeled "just for fun," but it is so irrational it borders on trolling. 😛

Dulak
Veteran Member

14 years ago

#13

"shield4life" wrote:

I realize the 2nd thing is made to be controversial ...

I dont see either choice worth much ... and the 2nd ... come on ... Id rather watch a boring soap opera then watch cutler as a green bay packer.

Granted we still dont know if finley will be back at full strength but jennings and rodgers? ...

and we dont need anotherWR even if we lose jones - that would be too much $ at one position.

KR/PR when we going to have a decent guy ...

Rockmolder
Honored Member

14 years ago

#14

That first trade is somewhat reasonable, though.

I mean, Fitzgerald might be the best at his position. Can you imagine Rodgers just throwing it up to Fitz and him coming down with just about every jumpball? Especially in combination with Jennings and Driver in the slot. And then you still keep one of your "younger" receivers in Nelson or Jones.

The trade would've been more tempting if it was proposed a couple of years ago, as Fitzgerald does have some years in his legs by now.

A 1st and 2nd does look like a lot, but we do have the 32nd pick and, really, how often would you get the chance to pick someone like that at that point in the draft?

But really, it's giving up your youth for winning now. Something that's not that weird for a team to do when they come from a SB victory, but it doesn't go with Ted's style. Next to that, I'd like to mantain longterm succes, not peak now and and stop winning in 3 years.

TheKanataThrilla
Veteran Member

14 years ago

#15

I love Larry, but if we really wanted a WR that bad we could just draft a really good one this year with our first pick. A-Rod can make a really good receiver into a great receiver in my opinion.

Since69
Registered

14 years ago

#16

No, and No. Not even for fun.

SINCITYCHEEZE
Senior Member

14 years ago

#17

"gbguy20" wrote:

"shield4life" wrote:

not just no but hell no :scratch: :facepalm: :face1: :shaking2: Who are we?the Vikes? :onfloor: :onfloor: :onfloor:

Wisconsin Born, Packer Bred

nerdmann
Premier Member

14 years ago

#18

I'd give Jones for a 1st, a 2nd and Larry. But not the other way around. I picked him over Jordy, because his contract is up anyway.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

Dexter_Sinister
Registered

14 years ago

#19

Cutler is a loser, Hester is fast, stupid and can't catch. Olsen is an OK TE, but that is about it for him.

I wouldn't even consider picking up any of them if they were FAs. Even if we needed a QB a TE and a WR because ours were all in the the hospital with SARS.

I want to go out like my Grandpa did. Peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming in terror like his passengers.

nerdmann
Premier Member

14 years ago

#20

"Dexter_Sinister" wrote:

I'd take Quarless over Olsen.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

wpr (17h) : 7 days

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep

dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire

dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that

dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.

dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move

dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what

Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife

Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately

Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.

dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.

Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Guessing they probably knew. Did he have cast or something on?

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : Did they know that at the time or was that something the realized afterwards?

Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Van Ness played most of season with broken thumb

wpr (9-Apr) : yay

Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Mark Murphy says Steelers likely to protect Packers game. Meaning, no Ireland

Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Struggling to figure out what text editor options are needed and which are 'nice to have'

Mucky Tundra (8-Apr) : *CHOMP CHOMP CHOMP*

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : WR who said he'd break Xavier Worthy 40 time...and ran slower than you

Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Who?

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Texas’ WR Isaiah Bond is scheduled to visit the Bills, Browns, Chiefs, Falcons, Packers and Titans starting next week.

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Spotting ball isn't changing, only measuring distance is, Which wasn't the issue.

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : The spotting of the ball IS the issue. Not the chain gang.

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24

Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM

Eagles

10 - 22