macbob
  • macbob
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
14 years ago
For the balanced attack crowd, note Capers comment toward the end about stopping the run to make the opposing team's offense one-dimensional.

http://www.packers.com/news-and-events/article-1/Stats-tell-the-tale-of-Capers-impact/3f720dcd-09f3-4c06-9454-42178bce7148 

INDIANAPOLIS His stats are seldom out of his reach. Even at the scouting combine, they are right by his side.

Packers defensive coordinator Dom Capers, one of the two biggest names of the last 20 years on the defensive side of the ball, is defined by his stats. He believes in their validity. In his mind, they dont lie.

Why have so many teams abandoned the time-honored 4-3 defense and made the move to the 3-4 Capers has helped define?

Look at who the top five defensive teams are, Capers said. Its a copy-cat league and it goes in cycles.

Those top five defenses, by the way, include the Packers, Saints, Jets and Steelers. Four of the leagues top five defenses were in the postseason; two of them were in the Super Bowl.

You want stats? Try these:

In one years time, Capers turned a Steelers defense that was 22nd in points allowed in 1991 to second in the same category in 92.

As head coach of the expansion Carolina Panthers, his defense was eighth in the league in points allowed in the teams inaugural season. A year later, it was number two.

In 1999, he took a Jaguars defense that was 17th in points allowed and 26th in sacks the previous season and made it number one in both categories. By the way, that was in a 4-3 scheme.

As Packers defensive coordinator, Capers took a defense that was 24th in points allowed in 08 and brought it to number seven in 09 and to number two in 10.

Today, the formula for me is you have to have a good quarterback and you have to have a good defense, Capers said.

The Packers, of course, have both, which is largely the reason they are the reigning Super Bowl champions.

Always mindful of statistical trends, Capers has locked onto a new one. Its a Capers original: passer rating differential. Capers points to the plus-41 passer rating the Packers enjoyed in the postseason. Its similar to the passer rating differential the Saints enjoyed the previous season.

The encouraging thing to me is we have a 27-year-old quarterback that went through the playoffs with a 109 passer rating. I just like the formula we have for this football team in this day and age, Capers said.

Yeah, a good quarterback and a strong defense. Capers has a good feeling about holding up his end of the formula.

With 2010 draft picks Mike Neal and Morgan Burnett coming off injured reserve, Capers envisions a Packers defense thatll be even stronger than the one that sacked its way through the NFC last season.

If we get a guy or two in the draft, it would be like having two drafts, Capers said.

Somewhat surprisingly, the Steelers running game poked holes in the Packers defense in the Super Bowl. It might have sounded alarm bells for need on the defensive line.

I felt confident going into the game that we could stop the run. I was concerned in the third quarter when they ran the ball five straight times and went down the field and scored, Capers said.

Scouting combine workouts for defensive linemen will be conducted on Monday at Lucas Oil Stadium. The defensive line crop is thought to be significant.

Ill be interested to watch the workout, Capers said. Its always been we have to stop the run. If we can do that and make it a one-dimensional game, there are a lot of things we can do. If they keep you in second-and-5 all day, you cant use (those blitzes.)

The Packers were 18th in the league against the run in 2010. If theres a facet of the Packers defense that could stand improvement, thats probably it. Another run-stuffer up front might make the Packers even better than the stats say they are.

Packers.com wrote:

Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago

Somewhat surprisingly, the Steelers running game poked holes in the Packers defense in the Super Bowl. It might have sounded alarm bells for need on the defensive line.



Uh, really? I seem to remember Mendenhall running 14 times for 63 yards, a whopping 4.5-yard average.

So the Steelers's defense shut down the Packers' running back, despite his notching 4.7 yards per carry, while the Steelers' running back poked holes in the Packers' defense, despite the face he was held to fewer yards per carry.

I find the odd ways sportswriters' minds work endlessly fascinating.
UserPostedImage
Greg C.
14 years ago

Somewhat surprisingly, the Steelers running game poked holes in the Packers defense in the Super Bowl. It might have sounded alarm bells for need on the defensive line.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



Uh, really? I seem to remember Mendenhall running 14 times for 63 yards, a whopping 4.5-yard average.

So the Steelers's defense shut down the Packers' running back, despite his notching 4.7 yards per carry, while the Steelers' running back poked holes in the Packers' defense, despite the face he was held to fewer yards per carry.

I find the odd ways sportswriters' minds work endlessly fascinating.



To be fair, it should be noted that Mendenhall was not the only RB who carried the ball for the Steelers. The Steeler RBs carried the ball 19 times for 95 yards, which is a 5.0 average.
blank
bozz_2006
14 years ago
That drive in the third, coupled with the loss of Shields and Chuck right before the half had me very worried too. On that drive especially, I'd concede that they most definitely poked holes in our run D. But I think that was mostly due to our defense trying to figure out how to play without Woodson and Shields.
UserPostedImage
bozz_2006
14 years ago
man, typing up that last post got me thinking again. What the Packers were able to do, all year long, absorbing lost player after lost player. And in the Super Bowl, winning despite losing Driver and Woodson, our two emotional and on-field leaders (not to mention losing Shields for a quarter plus).... This team is so good it's scary. And so many of these guys coming back next year. Wow. Be afraid, you 31 other teams, be very afraid.
UserPostedImage
Dexter_Sinister
14 years ago
Capers seemed to dare people to run the ball against his nickel, dime and psycho packages.

Teams were mildly successful against the run D but couldn't sustain drives because we shut down the passing game. They produced a few rushing yards but failed to put up points. Which is the only thing that really matters.
I want to go out like my Grandpa did. Peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming in terror like his passengers.
bozz_2006
14 years ago

They produced a few rushing yards but failed to put up points. Which is the only thing that really matters.

"Dexter_Sinister" wrote:



Nah uh! Defenses are ranked by how many yards they give up, so that's what really matters! :crazy:
UserPostedImage
earthquake
14 years ago

Capers seemed to dare people to run the ball against his nickel, dime and psycho packages.

Teams were mildly successful against the run D but couldn't sustain drives because we shut down the passing game. They produced a few rushing yards but failed to put up points. Which is the only thing that really matters.

"Dexter_Sinister" wrote:



Yes this is one thing I noticed in 2010. In 2009 it was very hard to run against the packers D, they were shutting down the run and daring teams to pass on them, and well, it didn't work out very well. In 2010 they sold out to stop the pass, and their numbers against the run dropped, but they were still a pretty good team against the run, and points against and passing production dropped a huge amount. I'll take that result any day. What use is a top 5 rushing D if you can't stop the pass? I'd rather have a top 5 passing D and a top 10/15 rushing D.
blank
IronMan
14 years ago

Somewhat surprisingly, the Steelers running game poked holes in the Packers defense in the Super Bowl. It might have sounded alarm bells for need on the defensive line.

"Greg C." wrote:



Uh, really? I seem to remember Mendenhall running 14 times for 63 yards, a whopping 4.5-yard average.

So the Steelers's defense shut down the Packers' running back, despite his notching 4.7 yards per carry, while the Steelers' running back poked holes in the Packers' defense, despite the face he was held to fewer yards per carry.

I find the odd ways sportswriters' minds work endlessly fascinating.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



To be fair, it should be noted that Mendenhall was not the only RB who carried the ball for the Steelers. The Steeler RBs carried the ball 19 times for 95 yards, which is a 5.0 average.


Our rush d was ranked 28th in the NFL allowing 4.7 ypc. In 2009 we were first, allowing only 3.6 ypc.
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago

To be fair, it should be noted that Mendenhall was not the only RB who carried the ball for the Steelers. The Steeler RBs carried the ball 19 times for 95 yards, which is a 5.0 average.

"Greg C." wrote:



True. Redman and Moore carried the ball 5 times for 32 yards, and Roethlisberger rushed 4 times for 31 yards. I don't put much stock in the latter, however. Quarterback rushing figures tend to be inflated, since most of their rushes come in protection breakdowns, when the defenses aren't in position to defend the run.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (18m) : Packers were not selected for the 2025 Hall of Fame game.
dfosterf (2h) : PFOW Out of our division would be a good thing imo
Zero2Cool (4h) : Jameson Williams is done at 24 years old? What? He's a WR, not QB. I'm missing something here haha
wpr (4h) : Tomorrow is almost here.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : would you want him if Pack needed a back up qb?
packerfanoutwest (4h) : JW is done......stick a fork in him
Zero2Cool (6h) : You should. He goes to AFC that helps Packers.
packerfanoutwest (17h) : don't care
Zero2Cool (22h) : Lions shopping Jameson Williams?
packerfanoutwest (22-Apr) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat
wpr (22-Apr) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.
wpr (22-Apr) : now 3
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Who? What?
beast (22-Apr) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
Martha Careful (21-Apr) : meh
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast
wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22h / Packers Draft Threads / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.