It is really weird having a good D, I'm not used it. I actually trust them with the game on the line. That INT by Williams will unreal, he put it all on the line, either it was going to be an INT or he was going to mistime the jump and it was going to be a TD. Gutsy, athletic play.
Taking the ST out of it because I don't trust them. Let's assume next week, you could have one of the following two options, what would you take?
1) Falcons on own 30 with 2 minutes left, no timeouts but Packers are up 17-14 and its on the D to stop them.
2) Packers on own 40 with 2 minutes left, no timeouts but Packers are down 17-14. What would you rather have? The being up with the D there to try to stop them but its possible the Falcons score and you lose. Or have control with a chance to tie or win?
Any other Packer year in recent memory, I'd take the O by a longshot but this year, I don't know, I think I would actually rather take my chances with the D.
A big sack by Clay, an INT by Williams, who knows.
EDIT: Looking at it, I don't know if the 2nd option is that attractive, may be it should be edited to having the ball at midfield or something. Either way, you get my drift.