Pack93z
13 years ago



I think everyone should be furious over the drop Jones had, though. That is inexcusable.

"DakotaT" wrote:



No they rather rag on Mike McCarthy even tho IMO JJ has costs us more point then Mike McCarthy

"longtimefan" wrote:



Christ, who's ragging? Is it OK to question a play call anymore? I'll be damned if ever going to be a lemming off a cliff. For the most part McCarthey called a pretty good game, he just typically went conservative instead of putting the game away.

"all_about_da_packers" wrote:



I agree we kind of shelled it at times.. in another thread.. late with like 2 minutes left run a strong PA pass deep and gut them out.

Or the 3rd and short run with Kuhn that may have sealed the game early.

Still the killer was Jones dropped that would have iced the game.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Zero2Cool
13 years ago
I don't think you can ice the game in the first half. Sure would have been great to have that 7 though.
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
13 years ago
21 - 3 with the ball first in the second. Yes with us taking much of the deep part of the field and they way we moved the ball today. Effectively iced. IMO.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Zero2Cool
13 years ago

21 - 3 with the ball first in the second. Yes with us taking much of the deep part of the field and they way we moved the ball today. Effectively iced. IMO.

"Pack93z" wrote:



I recall that very Eagles team putting up something like 28 points in 8 minutes of a fourth quarter.

Not iced in the first half, sorry, just not true. I don't see how anyone can even say that with out laughing. A team with urgency is a dangerous time, in my opinion. And the Eagles showed how dangerous they are against what some say are insurmountable odds.
UserPostedImage
TheKanataThrilla
13 years ago

21 - 3 with the ball first in the second. Yes with us taking much of the deep part of the field and they way we moved the ball today. Effectively iced. IMO.

"Pack93z" wrote:



I agree. I think Philly must have felt that they were given a huge break going into halftime. No TD and we wimp out even trying to get a FG.
Pack93z
13 years ago
Fine you disagree.. but throw in an insult or dig for measure. Nice.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
porky88
13 years ago

I didn't like the conservative play calling in the 4th. I was praising him a few weeks ago against the Giants but now?

We won, so I can't complain too much but still. It makes the games much closer and scarier, lol.

"all_about_da_packers" wrote:




It's how McCarthy operates, and frankly I don't think anyone should expect him to change.

We've seen it many times before (against the 49ers last year, against the Lions this year, as examples) where in the fourth McCarthy chooses to tone down the aggressiveness and run plays that run time off the clock (usually running plays).

It is what it is, I suppose.

"RedSoxExcel" wrote:



Yeah, I am not crazy about Marty ball, which is exactly what he does when leading. At the same time though, I rather understood sitting on the 14-3 lead. As you said, the wind was swirling and 14-3 is a good first half. In addition, they got the ball to start the second half. It made some sense.

Overall, he called a very balanced game. This was a team effort.
Zero2Cool
13 years ago

Fine you disagree.. but through in an insult for measure. Nice.

"Pack93z" wrote:

I didn't throw an insult, not at all. I just don't see how anyone can say the game can be iced while there is still a full two quarters to play. That just sounds so unreasonable to me, especially 21 - 3 against a team that threw up 28 in 8 minutes in the end of a fourth quarter.

Sorry man, I just don't see it being something within reason. I don't mean it as an insult.
UserPostedImage
Cuz481
13 years ago
They win and people still find something to complain about.
blank
Zero2Cool
13 years ago

They win and people still find something to complain about.

"Cuz481" wrote:



GO PACK GO!
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (2h) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (4h) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (14h) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (14h) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (14h) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (14h) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (14h) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (18h) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (18h) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (18h) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (20h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (20h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (20h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (20h) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (20h) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (20h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (20h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (20h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (21h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (22h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (22h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (22h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (22h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (22h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
12m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

14m / Random Babble / beast

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

9h / GameDay Threads / Mucky Tundra

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.