MM: Biggest Pussy Ever· Page 3

DakotaT
Select Member

13 years ago

I have to agree with Hazr on this: did I say that? The third and three play to Kuhn at the fifty with around 8 minutes was chicken shit pussy football. Go for the damn jugular. That game was 21-10 at the time, far from being over.

get_louder_at_lambeau
Registered

13 years ago

#22

Did we just win a playoff game on the road?

"Pack93z" wrote:

I thought so too. First road playoff win since Holmgren left town. Let's all bitch and cry until they fire the coach!

http://packersnews.net

go.pack.go.
Veteran Member

13 years ago

#23

Was I seeing things or did we take our shot to Jones only to see him drop it?

DakotaT
Select Member

13 years ago

#24

Did we just win a playoff game on the road?

"get_louder_at_lambeau" wrote:

I thought so too. First road playoff win since Holmgren left town. Let's all bitch and cry until they fire the coach!

"Pack93z" wrote:

I'm not crying, just saying McCarthey is a pussy. Put the game on ice then play conservative. If Tramon wouldn't have baited that last throw, we could have lost.

go.pack.go.
Veteran Member

13 years ago

#25

Did we just win a playoff game on the road?

"DakotaT" wrote:

I thought so too. First road playoff win since Holmgren left town. Let's all bitch and cry until they fire the coach!

"get_louder_at_lambeau" wrote:

I'm not crying, just saying McCarthey is a pussy. Put the game on ice then play conservative. If Tramon wouldn't have baited that last throw, we could have lost.

"Pack93z" wrote:

Could've, would've, should've. WE WON THE GAME.

all_about_da_packers
Senior Member

13 years ago

#26

Something to those angry about not going for it at the end of the half: perhaps McCarthy did not have confidence Crosby could kick the FG?

Going in the same direction in the first Q, Eagles' kicker missed a 41 (or something) yard FG. The announcers mentioned there was wind and it was making kicking difficult during the warm-ups.

Perhaps he did not have full confidence Crosby could make it, or perhaps he did not want to risk damaging Crosby's confidence. Either scenario, he thought needlessly taking a risk might not have been worth it. I'd like to hear his thoughts about why he chose not to at least get a FG before I demand his head, though.

I think everyone should be furious over the drop Jones had, though. That is inexcusable.

The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.

all_about_da_packers
Senior Member

13 years ago

#27

I didn't like the conservative play calling in the 4th. I was praising him a few weeks ago against the Giants but now?

We won, so I can't complain too much but still. It makes the games much closer and scarier, lol.

"RedSoxExcel" wrote:

It's how McCarthy operates, and frankly I don't think anyone should expect him to change.

We've seen it many times before (against the 49ers last year, against the Lions this year, as examples) where in the fourth McCarthy chooses to tone down the aggressiveness and run plays that run time off the clock (usually running plays).

It is what it is, I suppose.

The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.

DakotaT
Select Member

13 years ago

#28

"all_about_da_packers" wrote:

Anybody have any objection to getting some run blocking O-lineman for a change then? I love it when we run the ball, but we haven't all year. And you are not picking up a 3rd and three with the game on the line, running your fullback.

longtimefan
Registered

13 years ago

#29

I think everyone should be furious over the drop Jones had, though. That is inexcusable.

"all_about_da_packers" wrote:

No they rather rag on Mike McCarthy even tho IMO JJ has costs us more point then MM

DakotaT
Select Member

13 years ago

#30

I think everyone should be furious over the drop Jones had, though. That is inexcusable.

"longtimefan" wrote:

No they rather rag on Mike McCarthy even tho IMO JJ has costs us more point then Mike McCarthy

"all_about_da_packers" wrote:

Christ, who's ragging? Is it OK to question a play call anymore? I'll be damned if ever going to be a lemming off a cliff. For the most part McCarthey called a pretty good game, he just typically went conservative instead of putting the game away.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

beast (2h) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁

beast (10h) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game

packerfanoutwest (14h) : both games Watson missed, Packers won

Martha Careful (16h) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I literally just said it.

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS