K_Buz
  • K_Buz
  • Member Topic Starter
14 years ago
Was anyone else screaming at the TV to go for it? I was. I thought that was horrible playcalling during that series and didn't see a FG as a good option there.

If we were up by 6, I would have took the FG with no problem but only being up 3 I didn't see any advantage not going for the TD to go up 10.
Since69
14 years ago
No. Absolutely not. We'd gotten stuffed on two or three straight attempts already. On the road against a tough opponent you always take the points.
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
People always say you have to take the points, yet in almost every single game in which there's a "just take the points" situation, we lose. Why not try something else for a change? The Patriots had stacked the middle of the line, but both the left and right sides of the field were wide open. They waited till third down to roll Flynn out, at which point every man on the Patriots' defense knew exactly what was going to happen. Had they gone for it on 4th and failed, they would have pinned the Patriots inside the 1 yard line. I like the odds there. The Patriots hadn't shown the ability to mount a sustained drive all night.

Stop playing afraid. Step on the jugular.

Seriously, have the Packers won a single game this year in which they settled for taking the points?
UserPostedImage
peteralan71
14 years ago
I would have liked to see us go for it and put the Patriots down. This was our one chance to beat the Patriots. If we were to play them again, you all know where it would be. Given the proverbial 1 in a million chance that we have to get to that point (I'm not going to jinx us by saying it 🙂 ), if we were to get there and play the Pats, they would be taking the game MUCH more seriously. They were looking at us like we were looking at the Lions last week. We were an oversight that almost cost them. Luckily for them, we had a backup QB at the helm that decided to throw the ball at the middle of the field with ~25 seconds in the game, and then didn't know what to do.

I don't put this on McCarthy, and to those that are saying FIRE McCarthy.... that just makes me speechless after last nights game. He had these guys loose all week, but they obviously came out of the gates ready to play. He had the amazing idea to do an onside kick to start the game off so that we could get the momentum.... he does not deserve to get fired. Come on guys/gals. Unreal.
Green Bay: Home of the Green & Gold. And the hunter orange. And the camouflage.
UserPostedImage
Stevetarded
14 years ago
Taking the FG was the right call. You make sure NE needs a TD on their next drive. The part that was stupid of McCarthy was running the same exact FB dive that had just failed AGAIN on 3rd down.
blank
Greg C.
14 years ago

Seriously, have the Packers won a single game this year in which they settled for taking the points?

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



I don't know how often this situation has come up this season. I usually like going for it in that situation, but this time, I was on the fence. Considering how hopeless the previous three plays looked, I didn't blame McCarthy for kicking the field goal.
blank
mi_keys
14 years ago

Seriously, have the Packers won a single game this year in which they settled for taking the points?

"Greg C." wrote:



I don't know how often this situation has come up this season. I usually like going for it in that situation, but this time, I was on the fence. Considering how hopeless the previous three plays looked, I didn't blame McCarthy for kicking the field goal.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



No, but had we settled for the points against the Redskins and taken the field goal we would have won that game. Instead we went for it on 4th down and didn't convert. Generally, I am with you in terms of going for it more often on 4th and 1, but we have possibly the worst offense in 1 yardage situations I've ever seen. In three of our losses this year we had first and goal from the one or two yard line and failed to score a touchdown. In those three cases we failed to convert on 4th, fumbled on 3rd down, and settled for a field goal. All because we are completely incapable of creating any push when it is everyone on the line and everyone knows this is going to be a scrum. We never create a fucking inch. It's pathetic. I'm not asking for them to consistently blow everyone out of the water in these situations but just once, once in the twenty or thirty times we've run on 3rd or 4th and 1 or from the 1 yard line could we create an inch of space for whoever is running the ball?
Born and bred a cheesehead
warhawk
14 years ago
If Matt had not thrown the INT last week and we had gotten three there we could have won that game with a FG at the end. Instead, we had to have the TD and lost.

On the road in a tight game you take the points especially since we had let NE back in the game. Going away with 0 there would have been huge for NE and not to forget the only TD the D had really given up was on NE's first drive of the game. The other 14 to that point came from the INT and the KO return (essentially).

Based on how the D was playing it was the right call.
"The train is leaving the station."
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
I really wish I had a good database with software to search it (like STATS, LLC does) to see how often the conventional wisdom of "take the points" actually holds true. I'm pretty confident it's as fallacious as the idea that punting is better than going for it on 4th down, but I just don't have the tools to analyze the data.
UserPostedImage
Stevetarded
14 years ago

I really wish I had a good database with software to search it (like STATS, LLC does) to see how often the conventional wisdom of "take the points" actually holds true. I'm pretty confident it's as fallacious as the idea that punting is better than going for it on 4th down, but I just don't have the tools to analyze the data.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



Well one thing we do know is that this team has converted only 38% of it's 4th downs this year
blank
Fan Shout
dfosterf (21h) : Make sure to send my props to him! A plus move!
Zero2Cool (23h) : My cousin, yes.
dfosterf (23h) : That was your brother the GB press gazette referenced with the red cross draft props thing, yes?
Zero2Cool (2-Jul) : Packers gonna unveil new throwback helmet in few weeks.
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : I know it's Kleiman but this stuff writes itself
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : "Make sure she signs the NDA before asking for a Happy Ending!"
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : @NFL_DovKleiman Powerful: Deshaun Watson is taking Shedeur Sanders 'under his wing' as a mentor to the Browns QBs
Zero2Cool (30-Jun) : Dolphins get (back) Minkah Fitzpatrick in trade
Zero2Cool (30-Jun) : Steelers land Jalen Ramsey via Trade
dfosterf (26-Jun) : I think it would be great to have someone like Tom Grossi or Andy Herman on the Board of Directors so he/they could inform us
dfosterf (26-Jun) : Fair enough, WPR. Thing is, I have been a long time advocate to at least have some inkling of the dynamics within the board.
wpr (26-Jun) : 1st world owners/stockholders problems dfosterf.
Martha Careful (25-Jun) : I would have otherwise admirably served
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Also, no more provision for a write-in candidate, so Martha is off the table at least for this year
dfosterf (25-Jun) : You do have to interpret the boring fine print, but all stockholders all see he is on the ballot
dfosterf (25-Jun) : It also says he is subject to another ballot in 2028. I recall nothing of this nature with Murphy
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy is on my ballot subject to me penciling him in as a no.
dfosterf (25-Jun) : I thought it used to be we voted for the whatever they called the 45, and then they voted for the seven, and then they voted for Mark Murphy
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Because I was too lazy to change my address, I haven't voted fot years until this year
dfosterf (25-Jun) : of the folks that run this team. I do not recall Mark Murphy being subject to our vote.
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy yay or nay is on the pre-approved ballot that we always approve because we are uninformed and lazy, along with all the rest
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Weird question. Very esoteric. For stockholders. Also lengthy. Sorry. Offseason.
Zero2Cool (25-Jun) : Maybe wicked wind chill made it worse?
Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : And then he signs with Cleveland in the offseason
Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : @SharpFootball WR Diontae Johnson just admitted he refused to enter a game in 41° weather last year in Baltimore because he felt “ice cold”
Zero2Cool (24-Jun) : Yawn. Rodgers says he is "pretty sure" this be final season.
Zero2Cool (23-Jun) : PFT claims Packers are having extension talks with Zach Tom, Quay Walker.
Mucky Tundra (20-Jun) : GB-Minnesota 2004 Wild Card game popped up on my YouTube page....UGH
beast (20-Jun) : Hmm 🤔 re-signing Walker before Tom? Sounds highly questionable to me.
Mucky Tundra (19-Jun) : One person on Twitter=cannon law
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Well, to ONE person on Tweeter
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : According to Tweeter
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Packers are working on extension for LT Walker they hope to have done before camp
dfosterf (18-Jun) : E4B landed at Andrews last night
dfosterf (18-Jun) : 101 in a 60
dfosterf (18-Jun) : FAFO
Zero2Cool (18-Jun) : one year $4m with incentives to make it up to $6m
dfosterf (18-Jun) : Or Lions
dfosterf (18-Jun) : Beats the hell out of a Vikings signing
Zero2Cool (18-Jun) : Baltimore Ravens now have signed former Packers CB Jaire Alexander.
dfosterf (14-Jun) : TWO magnificent strikes for touchdowns. Lose the pennstate semigeezer non nfl backup
dfosterf (14-Jun) : There was minicamp Thursday. My man Taylor Engersma threw
dfosterf (11-Jun) : There will be a mini camp practice Thursday.
Zero2Cool (11-Jun) : He's been sporting a ring for a while now. It's probably Madonna.
Martha Careful (10-Jun) : We only do the tea before whoopee, it relaxes me.
wpr (10-Jun) : That's awesome Martha.
Mucky Tundra (10-Jun) : How's the ayahuasca tea he makes, Martha?
Martha Careful (10-Jun) : Turns out he like older women
Martha Careful (10-Jun) : I wasn't supposed to say anything, but yes the word is out and we are happy 😂😂😂
Mucky Tundra (10-Jun) : I might be late on this but Aaron Rodgers is now married
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

2-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

2-Jul / Fantasy Sports Talk / dfosterf

1-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

29-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

25-Jun / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

23-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

18-Jun / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

16-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

15-Jun / Random Babble / Martha Careful

14-Jun / Around The NFL / beast

14-Jun / Community Welcome! / dfosterf

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.