Announcement PH Beta → Check it out! Click Me! (you might be see "unsafe", but it is safe)
4PackGirl
14 years ago
i was amazed by his poise & calm demeanor. no deer in the headlights look from him. that impressed me the most.
nerdmann
14 years ago
We've seen enough of him to know how he plays. Does some nice things, moves the ball, then throws an INT eventually.
Might be better practicing with the starters.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Greg C.
14 years ago

Agreed on the mobility and the pocket presence, but not on the ability to throw deep. And it wasn't just that he put a lot of air under the ball. He did not throw an accurate deep pass all day, and because of that he left three TDs on the field.

There's plenty of blame to go around--all of it on the offense--so I don't want to be too harsh on the backup QB who had to come into a game with no running game and not a lot of time to throw the ball. But the fact is that you need a pretty good QB to run this offense, and Flynn was not even close to being pretty good. Our backup QB situation is much more worrisome today than it was yesterday.

"all_about_da_packers" wrote:



I would have to disagree. He did complete one pass to Jennings for about 35 yards in the 4th when Jennings was covered by CB Houston on the Lions. He may have missed on a couple of deep balls (Driver along the sideline comes to mind, as does Jennings on 4th and 1 on final drive) but it's not like he overthrew them terribly. I'm assuming he doesn't get much reps with Driver / Jennings, so I think those off-throws are easily correctable if he can get more comfortable with his receivers and understand when to take a little something off the ball.

Still, I think as far as back-ups go, he is okay. Compared to the elite QB play we've had for almost 20 years, sure Flynn is lacking, but for a back-up he got the offense going on some drives and generally did okay - minus the horrendous INT. I don't think you can expect more from a back-up than that who had no running game and an O-line that was sub-par (and that is putting it nicely).

"Greg C." wrote:



There is room for disagreement here, but I think the long completion to Jennings was actually a pretty mediocre throw. With a better throw he hits Jennings in stride for a TD. I think you can expect a lot more from a backup QB that what we saw from Flynn today. I'm not writing him off yet, as this is only one game, but the lack of accuracy is what really stood out to me, as well as the lack of authority on the longer throws. I don't expect him to hit on all of them. He is only a backup after all. But he needed to hit at least one of them, and he couldn't get it done.
blank
rabidgopher04
14 years ago

It's interesting that a couple of weeks ago on the Mike McCarthy show, Rodgers was asked about not sliding and he said he wanted to prove to his critics that he is tough, and that is why he doesn't shy away from contact ...

Frankly, I've heard of critics of Rodgers say he holds on to the ball too long, but have never heard anyone question his toughness. I found that statement weird, as did Larry McCarren who asked Rodgers to follow up on who questioned his toughness, and Rodgers gave a very elusive answer along the lines of 'sometimes my brother (who Aaron lives with) teases me for ending the play without contact'....

I don't mean to imply Aaron is inviting contact for selfish reasons, but when asked about it before it seemed like a really odd response that he wanted to prove his critics wrong. I cannot think of anyone over the past few years who has questioned Rodgers toughness or willingness for contact...

"all_about_da_packers" wrote:



Haven't people been questioning his toughness coming out of high school, college, and in the Dallas game (when Favre got hurt)? Maybe it's just something that's stuck with him mentally. Also, following Favre who has never missed a game might weigh into this for him.
Amazing Bacon Delivery  Service! Never be without good bacon again.
Zero2Cool
14 years ago
the lunge Flynn did on 3rd and 10 to get the first, I think that's one of the rare times a QB should be diving for yardage.
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
The fact that Matt Flynn couldn't lead this offense to victory against a team that was starting its 3rd-string quarterback, on a day when his defense holds the opposition to 7 points, has to be concerning at the very least. It's not like he was involved in a shootout. The Lions were shutout for the majority of the game.
UserPostedImage
istanbulpacker
14 years ago
Late to this thread but I've got something I don't think was covered. I'm curious others thoughts on Flynn's performance with relation to the chances he's had in previous weeks' live games. Seems we get a chance to put him in at the end of the game and we squander it on running plays. I know I've seen comments about this in chat during the game.

To me, that is precisely the time and play for your backup. Anyone can hand off a ball. If you are up enough points you are willing to put in your second team, then you should be willing to put a few balls in the air to give that QB some confidence and reps during a real gameday situation.

I don't think Flynn was marvelous out there. But, he's a developing QB. He had a poor read on his INT. I directly attribute that to nerves and lack of playing time. He DID lead the team all the way down the field on that drive though and I thought he moved the ball efficiently.

In my book, too soon to tell on his ability but at least he isn't the second coming of TJ Rubley.
blank
musccy
  • musccy
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
14 years ago

The fact that Matt Flynn couldn't lead this offense to victory against a team that was starting its 3rd-string quarterback, on a day when his defense holds the opposition to 7 points, has to be concerning at the very least. It's not like he was involved in a shootout. The Lions were shutout for the majority of the game.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



I acknowledge that this was his first game with an OLine that was putrid, many factors contributed to offensive woes, and he (purely statistically speaking) was actually even more productive than ARod. Consequently, I'm reluctant to completely give up on him.

But on the other hand...what NSD said!
macbob
14 years ago

he won't be on the team long

"dhpackr" wrote:



Sounds like you were right, dhpackr!

I had originally read this wrong and didn't realize you were saying he was going to be prime trade bait for additional draft picks... ::razz:

http://www.jsonline.com/sports/packers/112413099.html 

Packers quarterback Flynn attracts attention

Solid start likely to boost interest in him

Green Bay When Ron Wolf put backup quarterbacks Mark Brunell, Aaron Brooks and Matt Hasselbeck up for trade during his years as general manager of the Green Bay Packers, interested parties had to base their evaluations on preseason games and spot play.

All three quarterbacks had suffered the misfortune of playing behind Brett Favre, who avoided plays spent on the sideline as though it was prison time.

In a combined five seasons, the three attempted just 56 passes and were 0-2 in games in which Favre had to leave because of injury. Eventually they were all acquired by other teams that had no empirical evidence they were capable of being starters.

For sure, none of them had the kind of game Matt Flynn did last Sunday at New England.

Starting for injured quarterback Aaron Rogers (concussion), Flynn stepped in and completed 24 of 37 passes for 251 yards and three touchdowns with one interception. His passer rating of 100.2 was the highest by an NFL quarterback making his first career start against a team with a 10-2 record or better since the 1970 merger, according to the Elias Sports Bureau.

The Packers lost the game, 31-27, but Flynn had the Packers on the brink of breaking the Patriots' 15-game winning streak at Gillette Stadium.

"Obviously, it was a great experience for me, especially going up there and having some success and doing well," said Flynn, who has returned to his backup position with the return of Rodgers. "I guess it could add some positive things for my career, but it's one of those things; we lost. That was the only thing that was really on my mind."

It may not be all that is on the mind of a few general managers in the market for a quarterback next season. If there is no rookie salary limit next year, teams may find it cheaper to acquire Flynn as a restricted free agent or in a trade than drafting a quarterback in the first round.

By no means has Flynn done anything to show he's a surefire NFL starter, but he has at least one credential Wolf's quarterbacks didn't have: He started and finished a game against a quality opponent and deserved to win.

"It wasn't too big for him," Packers quarterbacks coach Tom Clements said of what Flynn proved. "He managed the team well, he generally made right decisions, he made plays with his arm, made plays with his feet. He looked comfortable operating the team."

During the off-season, general manager Ted Thompson will have to decide whether to get the most he can for Flynn before he becomes an unrestricted free agent or let it play out and risk losing him for nothing.

If the current free agent system is reinstated, Flynn will be a restricted free agent. He would be able to shop himself around the NFL, but through incremental qualifying offers the Packers would be able to raise the level of compensation as high as a first- and third-round pick.

If they go to the high end, they would have to pay Flynn a salary around $3 million next year. At the end of that season, Flynn would be unrestricted and free to go anywhere with no compensation if the Packers didn't put a franchise or transition tag on him.

"I think somebody's going to come and get him," receiver James Jones said. "If they don't, they're stupid, especially the teams in this league that need a quarterback."

Thompson could follow Wolf's lead and deal Flynn before the contract situation even comes up. Wolf traded Brunell and Hasselbeck after their second seasons and Brooks after his first.

For Brunell in 1995, he got third- and fifth-round picks from Jacksonville.

For Brooks in 2000, he got a third-round pick.

For Hasselbeck in 2001, he was able to move up seven spots to No. 10 in the first round as well as get a third-round pick.

If Flynn is viewed as a starter around the league, Thompson might not take less than a third-round pick based on those previous deals. The big question is whether Thompson would do it given his tendency not to do anything rash.

"Obviously, my goal is to be a starting quarterback, but it's not something I'm thinking about right now," Flynn said. "I've just been very fortunate to be tutored by some good quarterbacks coaches and be under Aaron. I've learned a ton.

"I feel more prepared this year than in the past. The more time I spend here, I kept getting better."

There may be some scouts who still question Flynn's arm strength, but few would question his toughness and poise. He's sometimes so calm that people think he is disinterested, which is far from the case.

"People at LSU, fans used to get mad at me because in games I'd look like I didn't care," Flynn said. "Obviously I did, but I wouldn't show emotion if good things or bad things happened. I guess it's just how I am. I don't know. It's not like I'm trying to do it. It's funny that people notice that."

If they noticed anything at the end of the Patriots game it was the apparent chaos that ensued after the clock was down to 23 seconds and Donald Driver's catch had left the Packers with a fourth and 1 at the Patriots 15 with no timeouts. From afar, Flynn looked like a deer in headlights - until it was time to get the team to the line and get off a play.

"We thought it was a first down," Flynn said. "Driver thought it was, I thought it was, the sideline was telling me to clock it. Once I realized that it wasn't, I looked over and it was like, 'Ah, can't do this.' And then the refs were taking a couple seconds (to spot the ball) and I was like, 'All right, we've got to go, we've got to get this play off.'"

Flynn did exactly that. The play went off without a hitch, but with eight defenders covering four receivers, he couldn't find anyone open in the end zone. He tried to extend the play by scrambling outside but was sacked.

Some wondered if Flynn might have been able to run a sneak, get the first down and then spike the ball with time left for a play or two. But Flynn had thought that through and realized it wasn't a good idea.

"Earlier in the game when we did a quarterback sneak, the defense had laid on me for a while," Flynn said. "So if I was a defender, that's what I would do."

Ultimately, victory slipped through his fingers, but an opportunity to impress did not.

"It kind of solidifies the confidence I've had," Flynn said. "It was good to go out there. I had a blast. I just love playing the game. I had a great time."

JSOnline.com wrote:

Fan Shout
beast (55m) : I was rooting for the Bears to win and hurt their draft pick status
Zero2Cool (1h) : Forgot there was even a game last night haha
TheKanataThrilla (1h) : That was terrible.
TheKanataThrilla (1h) : Watching that game in its entirety yesterday is proof positive that I am a football addict.
beast (1h) : And horrible time management multiple times... and not being able to score more than 3 points on a team with talent
beast (1h) : Realizing the Bears didn't fix it from the previous week and do the same thing, getting the game to overtime
beast (1h) : They probably are not tanking, but they've absolutely mismanagement some things, such as Vikings seeing the Packers blocked FG and realizing
Zero2Cool (2h) : Crazy of Bears to have that mindset that is
Zero2Cool (2h) : Hail Mary stop away from 5 - 2. Not sure how that flips to tanking. Crazy mindset if true
beast (3h) : I've quietly questioned if Bears are tanking on purpose... they suddenly got a lot worse with some simple concepts like 101 clock management
wpr (5h) : Watching bares fans melt down over how putrid their team is, so enjoyable. It's the gift that keeps on giving.
Mucky Tundra (12h) : The Seattle Seahawks defeat the Chicago Bears 6-3. Jason Myers had 6 RBIs for Seattle while Cairo Santos had 3 RBI for Chicago
beast (13h) : Not nessarily, he might of been injured either way. He's playing about 50% of the games the last 4 years
Zero2Cool (20h) : If they'd been more patient with him, he'd be back already. Putting him out there vs Bears caused him to tweak it and here we are.
packerfanoutwest (20h) : well this is his last season with the PAck, book it
beast (21h) : Sounds like no Alexander (again), I'm wondering if his time with the Packers is done
Zero2Cool (26-Dec) : Could ban beast and I still don't think anyone catches him.
Mucky Tundra (26-Dec) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore
packerfanoutwest (25-Dec) : Feliz Navidad!
Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!
beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
1m / Random Babble / Martha Careful

3m / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

9h / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Dec / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.