Aaron Rodgers hits milestones this week· Page 2

peteralan71
Registered

14 years ago

HOW HAVE MORE PEOPLE NOT LOOKED AT AND COMMENTED ON THIS?!!!!!!

:)

"zombieslayer" wrote:

Do we Packer fans take Rodgers for granted?

"peteralan71" wrote:

That's exactly what I was getting at. This should be a very hot topic on this forum. I'm extremely impressed with those stats. Just pray that he can keep it up now. There's no doubt in my mind that he is capable of doing so. Look how great he was last year and he was sacked 50 times. He's capable. My best criterion for why he is capable is that he puts up great numbers even when he is playing with "scrubs".

Green Bay: Home of the Green & Gold. And the hunter orange. And the camouflage.

wpr
Preferred Member

14 years ago

#12

HOW HAVE MORE PEOPLE NOT LOOKED AT AND COMMENTED ON THIS?!!!!!!

:)

"zombieslayer" wrote:

Do we Packer fans take Rodgers for granted?

"peteralan71" wrote:

I will get back to you in about 15 years. By then Aaron will have broken every record and taken GB to 10 SB titles. :wink:

zombieslayer
Registered

14 years ago

#13

I've said after the 2008 season that Rodgers would be a better QB moving forward than Mr. Regular Season. Really pisses me off Manning was All-Pro last year when Rodgers had a better year with the worst OL in the NFL for the first 8 games of the season and an average one after that.

This year, Manning's seeing injuries that we're used to and he's been sucking the past few games. Rodgers lost his starting RB the first game and his starting TE early as well, and Driver has been injured on and off the whole season, yet Rodgers doesn't do the stupid crap Manning does.

Rodgers:


2009  350      541      64.7      4434      30    7   8.2     103.2
2010  261      399      65.4      3243      23    9   8.3     100.3

Mr. Regular Season:


2009  393      571      68.8      4500      33   16  7.8      99.9
2010  353      534      66.1      3709      24   15  6.6      89.4

How can you argue against those numbers, especially considering Mr. Regular Season had an elite OL last year and the joke of an OL Rodgers had for the first half of the year?

This isn't even including the fact that Rodgers is the 2nd best scrambling QB in the NFL after Michael Vick and between Mr. Regular Season, Brett Favre, and my Grandma, I think my Grandma would win a foot race. Manning has 0 rushing TDs the past 2 years whereas Aaron's got 9.

I guess most importantly, Rodgers will end his career with more SB wins. That's what I want anyways.

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

peteralan71
Registered

14 years ago

#14

All these stats. So exciting!

Green Bay: Home of the Green & Gold. And the hunter orange. And the camouflage.

Greg C.
Registered

14 years ago

#15


2009  350      541      64.7      4434      30    7   8.2     103.2
2010  261      399      65.4      3243      23    9   8.3     100.3

Mr. Regular Season:


2009  393      571      68.8      4500      33   16  7.8      99.9
2010  353      534      66.1      3709      24   15  6.6      89.4

"zombieslayer" wrote:

You're conveniently omitting the fact that Manning had to break in a couple of new guys at receiver last season and he still led his team to a division title--something that Rodgers did not do. And it really doesn't work to call Manning Mr. Regular Season in a post where you are complaining about him winning the MVP award, considering that the MVP is awarded entirely on the basis of regular season performance. Rodgers is 0-1 in the playoffs anyway.

What I said last year is that Manning deserved the MVP, but Rodgers will get his due, and that's what appears to be happening this year. Recognition lags slightly behind success.

blank

peteralan71
Registered

14 years ago

#16

What I said last year is that Manning deserved the MVP, but Rodgers will get his due, and that's what appears to be happening this year.

"Greg C." wrote:

Mike Vick is currently leading in votes for the Pro-Bowl. We'd be kidding ourselves if we didn't think that he is also near the top for MVP votes. Anybody of the opinion that Rodgers could get the MVP over Vick this year? I tend to lean toward saying no. The reason for this is that people love a good story. Look at what Mike Vick has gone through (put himself through) and look what he has become. He was a 6-7/10 quarterback, and he is now a 9/10 quarterback, maybe even 10/10. There really isn't a whole lot more the guy could do.

Is there any way that, if it were just the two of them contending for the spot, Rodgers gets the MVP over Vick?

Green Bay: Home of the Green & Gold. And the hunter orange. And the camouflage.

Greg C.
Registered

14 years ago

#17

What I said last year is that Manning deserved the MVP, but Rodgers will get his due, and that's what appears to be happening this year.

"peteralan71" wrote:

"Greg C." wrote:

Of course it could happen, especially since a lot of people still have mixed feelings about Michael Vick. The Michael Vick story is very interesting, but not a classic feel-good story by any means.

Rodgers is still an underdog (no pun intended) to win the MVP award because, let's face it, his level of play during the first half of the season was not much above average. But since then he's been lights-out. If it's a dead heat between Rodgers and Vick for the MVP, I'm guessing that the player from the team that wins its division and/or has the better record will get the nod.

blank

peteralan71
Registered

14 years ago

#18

LOL at the non-pun!

When are the awards given out for MVP? I agree that the Vick story is not a feel good story and that some people would never vote for him just because of it, but I also believe that there are people that take the story in an opposite direction. They look at it as a resurgence, as a come from behind win. There are people that think that since he served his time (which was harsh when compared to Ray Lewis killing a guy and Ben Roethlisberger raping half of Pennsylvania) and that he is a different man with new beginnings. I feel like Vick's history could hurt him, but that it certainly could also help him.

Green Bay: Home of the Green & Gold. And the hunter orange. And the camouflage.

peteralan71
Registered

14 years ago

#19

Also, I have heard people talking about Rodgers and saying that perhaps this is what we will get for the future, a chronic slow-starter? His first game in 2008 as a starter, he stepped up and played huge against the Vikings, then followed it with a 324yd week 2 against the Lions. From there, it started to dwindle a bit. It remains to be seen if he is a chronic slow-starter, but as the old adage goes, "Two dots don't make a trend, they make a line."

Green Bay: Home of the Green & Gold. And the hunter orange. And the camouflage.

zombieslayer
Registered

14 years ago

#20

"Greg C." wrote:

Brees should have won it last year. He got robbed. He got his revenge in the SB though.

Breaking in new receivers? Mr. Regular Season has had possibly the best possession WR of all-time for most of his career. Now he's got Reggie Wayne.

It would be like if Favre had Sterling Sharpe for 10 years.

"Peteralan" wrote:

Vick and Brady are ahead of Rodgers for the MVP and rightly so. I was just saying Aaron's been better than Mr. Regular Season for 2009 and 2010. I said in 2008 that would be so.

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (3m) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (3m) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (3m) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (11m) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (11m) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (32m) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (1h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (1h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (2h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (2h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (2h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (2h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (2h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (2h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (2h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (2h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (2h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (2h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (3h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (3h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (3h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (3h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (3h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (3h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (3h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (3h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (3h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (3h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (3h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (3h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

packerfanoutwest (3h) : falcons are already ahead of us

beast (3h) : Packers will get in

beast (3h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen

packerfanoutwest (3h) : they still are in the playoffs

packerfanoutwest (3h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7

Zero2Cool (5h) : We can say it. We don't play.

Mucky Tundra (6h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints

Mucky Tundra (6h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games

Mucky Tundra (6h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.

buckeyepackfan (7h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.

Mucky Tundra (16h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan

beast (16h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings

bboystyle (17h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in

Mucky Tundra (20h) : Or ties, but let's be real here

Mucky Tundra (20h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses

Mucky Tundra (20h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch

buckeyepackfan (20h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?

Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks

Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.

Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS