#61? I can live with that. Behind Barry, Gale, Emmitt, Thorpe, O.J., Grange, Dickerson and Campbell, and most likely at least. Jim Brown and Wallie will probably be in the top 10 too.

Needless to say I would put him higher, but since he hasn't retired yet, he hasn't had the time to form the "legend" status that most of these guys got on the list with.

---

Keep in mind; the people who voted on this list are probably bias toward their childhood heroes. In the future, I'm sure players who played nowadays will be much higher on the list.

---

Disappointed not to see Junior Seau in there. Oh well.

Lots of great receivers left off the list too. Top 100 NFL Players is not so easy to write up, however.

---

I nailed the top three as well as the top 10. Though it wasn't hard to narrow things down.

I do have a problem with Reggie White being listed as an Eagle. He's as much as a Packer as he is an Eagle. I know he was better in Philly, but he meant more in Green Bay and won a ring for the Packers.

---

I couldn't agree more.

---

I don't know how they list Favre 12 spots behind Manning. I just don't see it. Not at this point in time.

Why not? Because Favre has records based on cumulative stats? Manning has been the better player.

There's a big chance that, looking back at it in 50 years, Manning might be remembered as the best QB ever.

Favre has stats because of longevity, not consistent domination at his position.

---

I no rings aren't everything but Manning's decline in the playoffs makes it hard for me to think of him that high. Glad Hudson was so high as he's often forgotten but he dominated the league like no other

Favre is 14th among active QBs.

That goes back to when they played. Starr was the best of the best when he played. Staubach, Graham, Herber or Unitas, how many of them were 14th among their contemporaries.

---