A luck escape?· Page 6

wpr
Preferred Member

14 years ago

Personally I think dhazer wants to see the Packers execute to perfection or he will rip on them. Like a coach, he wants to see them do it right every single time. No excuses. While I understand this, I also realize that they will make mistakes it is apart of the game as does the other team and the officials. I just don't think dhazer accepts that.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

I'd like perfection. I just don't think it's cool to point out every mistake call AGAINST the Packers and when mistake calls are pointed out FOR the Packers to bitch about it and say we're making excuses. Why is a bad call for the opposing team okay, but for us it's excuses?

Packers are like many teams in the NFL, they have flaws, they have injuries, they get calls, they don't some calls, its how things go. It's why you shouldn't get too bent out of shape one way or the other in my opinion. What goes around, comes around.

Packers are a good team that has that dreaded word, potential. we're coming up to the half way point in the season. I'm really interested in how we handle games 9-12 and I think that'll tell us a lot bout our team going forward.

"wpr" wrote:

I have no argument with you Zero. I was just rationalizing hazer's attitude.
In my "Coach" metaphor, when he is focused on his team's execution, the coach doesn't care about how many calls/breaks the other team got. He is looking to fix the things his team did wrong.
I was probably being too tolerant of hazer's antics.

Greg C.
Registered

14 years ago

#52

"wpr" wrote:

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

"wpr" wrote:

Yes, I think you were. There are other people here who are perfectionists, and although I often disagree with them, there's never any doubt about which team they are sticking up for. Dhazer is consistently critical of Aaron Rodgers (last week he referred to Rodgers as "a whiny bitch" for complaining about non-calls), he sometimes refers to our coach as Fred Flinstone, and of course there is his avatar, which is a caveman bashing Ted Thompson's head against a rock. If I hated Thompson and McCarthy that much I would probably want the Packers to lose so they would be fired and maybe take the "whiny bitch" with them when they left.

blank

longtimefan
Registered

14 years ago

#53

Here is what Mike Pereira said about it, he used to be the head NFL rules official I believe.

"Mike Pereira:

Matthews' helmet started to come off when he was blocked, and then he pushed it off the rest of the way so he could see. Interesting enough, it's not a foul, period. It's only a foul if a player removes his helmet to celebrate or to argue with an official or in a confrontation with another player. Therefore, during the play there is no restriction for removing the helmet.

.

"Stevetarded" wrote:

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

14 years ago

#54

If I hated Thompson and McCarthy that much I would probably want the Packers to lose so they would be fired and maybe take the "whiny bitch" with them when they left.

"Greg C." wrote:

Which is extremely selfish in my view. There's not going to be any GM or HC that is perfect or is going to be likable by everyone.

I'd rather win now with two men I hate, then wait 3-5 years hoping to win with someone I 'like'.

I see the Green Bay Packers, as the Green Bay Packers, not a egomanic GM or fat HC.

I root for the Packers, not the GM, not the HC.

dhazer
Veteran Member

14 years ago

#55

Seeing this is way off topic and you got your idiots that think they know me, we will continue with them. First off Greg and Steve you want to question my fan hood, well lets see you sit in the middle of steeler country and wear your Packer gear and have decals all over your vehicle including a Packer pissing on the Steelers. I know Greg you must have it real tough up there in the UP fighting with the rough Lion fans.

Now lets touch on a few things Greg said, do I hate Ted Thompson hell ya and I have from day 1, I never once waivered from that. Do I think we can win a super bowl with Freddy Flintstone (and the credit for that name goes to DFoster) and TT, thats a big fat Hell NO. Now about calling Rodgers a whiny bitch, it's because he has. His first 2 years of him starting and you never really saw him do those things, but after being an All Pro and the medias preseason MVP he has changed. I believe he listened to all the hype and it is hurting his game. He sure the hell isn't playing like he did the last 2 years. Also you bring up my avatar, well buddy if you don't like it then bitch at PackZ because he made it and him and Zero put it on there without me knowing and I just left it.

So once again you don't like how I show my fan hood them just ignore my posts and if you don't know how ask LTF he did it many times.

EDIT: and if you don't think they don't change things look at the bottom of my posts, congrats DFoster.

Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)

longtimefan
Registered

14 years ago

#56

But by the rules that should have been a 15 yd flag, I wonder if this will be explained why it wasn't. He took it off not like someone else did it. Just another thanks to the refs 🙂 I am sure our o-line was mugging the Vikes also but of course noone will admit to that.

To me we got a gift from the refs and that was that.

"dhazer" wrote:

WRONG

EX head of officiating said it was not a penalty

So are we back on topic now?

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

14 years ago

#57

Seeing this is way off topic and you got your idiots that think they know me, we will continue with them. First off Greg and Steve you want to question my fan hood, well lets see you sit in the middle of steeler country and wear your Packer gear and have decals all over your vehicle including a Packer pissing on the Steelers. I know Greg you must have it real tough up there in the UP fighting with the rough Lion fans.

Now lets touch on a few things Greg said, do I hate Ted Thompson hell ya and I have from day 1, I never once waivered from that. Do I think we can win a super bowl with Freddy Flintstone (and the credit for that name goes to DFoster) and Ted Thompson, thats a big fat Hell NO. Now about calling Rodgers a whiny bitch, it's because he has. His first 2 years of him starting and you never really saw him do those things, but after being an All Pro and the medias preseason MVP he has changed. I believe he listened to all the hype and it is hurting his game. He sure the hell isn't playing like he did the last 2 years. Also you bring up my avatar, well buddy if you don't like it then bitch at PackZ because he made it and him and Zero put it on there without me knowing and I just left it.

So once again you don't like how I show my fan hood them just ignore my posts and if you don't know how ask LTF he did it many times.

EDIT: and if you don't think they don't change things look at the bottom of my posts, congrats DFoster.

"dhazer" wrote:

You're a whiny bitch, not Aaron Rodgers.

signed
Idiot #1

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

14 years ago

#58

I still chuckle when I read "Just Imagine this trio for the next 69 years." That's a long time.

Stevetarded
Registered

14 years ago

#59

Seeing this is way off topic and you got your idiots that think they know me, we will continue with them. First off Greg and Steve you want to question my fan hood, well lets see you sit in the middle of steeler country and wear your Packer gear and have decals all over your vehicle including a Packer pissing on the Steelers. I know Greg you must have it real tough up there in the UP fighting with the rough Lion fans.

Now lets touch on a few things Greg said, do I hate Ted Thompson hell ya and I have from day 1, I never once waivered from that. Do I think we can win a super bowl with Freddy Flintstone (and the credit for that name goes to DFoster) and Ted Thompson, thats a big fat Hell NO. Now about calling Rodgers a whiny bitch, it's because he has. His first 2 years of him starting and you never really saw him do those things, but after being an All Pro and the medias preseason MVP he has changed. I believe he listened to all the hype and it is hurting his game. He sure the hell isn't playing like he did the last 2 years. Also you bring up my avatar, well buddy if you don't like it then bitch at PackZ because he made it and him and Zero put it on there without me knowing and I just left it.

So once again you don't like how I show my fan hood them just ignore my posts and if you don't know how ask LTF he did it many times.

EDIT: and if you don't think they don't change things look at the bottom of my posts, congrats DFoster.

"dhazer" wrote:

Don't make it so obvious that you wanted he Vikings to win on Sunday and nobody will question your fanhood. :thumbleft:

blank

Greg C.
Registered

14 years ago

#60

"dhazer" wrote:

Good for you for wearing Packer gear, but why is that such a big deal in Steeler country? I've always thought that Packer fans and Steeler fans respected each other, for the most part. They are kind of similar and the teams don't play each other often enough to create any kind of rivalry. Do the Steeler fans give you a lot of crap for the Packer gear?

blank

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (15m) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (23m) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (35m) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (1h) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (1h) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (1h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (1h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (1h) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (1h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (3h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (3h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (3h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (3h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (4h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (4h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (4h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (4h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (4h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (4h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (4h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (4h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (4h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (4h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (4h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (4h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (4h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (4h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (4h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (4h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (4h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (4h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (4h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (4h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

packerfanoutwest (5h) : falcons are already ahead of us

beast (5h) : Packers will get in

beast (5h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen

packerfanoutwest (5h) : they still are in the playoffs

packerfanoutwest (5h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7

Zero2Cool (6h) : We can say it. We don't play.

Mucky Tundra (8h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints

Mucky Tundra (8h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games

Mucky Tundra (8h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.

buckeyepackfan (8h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.

Mucky Tundra (17h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan

beast (18h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings

bboystyle (18h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in

Mucky Tundra (21h) : Or ties, but let's be real here

Mucky Tundra (21h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses

Mucky Tundra (21h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch

buckeyepackfan (21h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS