Bishop on Moss!?· Page 4

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

14 years ago

#31

wpr, no kudo's to Dom Capers. He came up bitch in the game. Ask Rourke, he'll tell ya. 🙂

porky88
Veteran Member

14 years ago

#32

When the 10 mil was put into the contract, both sides knew that they wouldn't stay true to that. Hawk knows it's either release or restructured. Right now, I'd consider restructuring it. Hawk has been really solid this season. He's earning his keep.

http://www.row12.com/

Yerko
Senior Member

14 years ago

#33

Love the Bishop/Hawk duo out there...shocked there are still some doubters of Hawk after the past couple of weeks.

Bishop can bring the boom...very exciting to watch.

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

14 years ago

#34

wpr, no kudo's to Dom Capers. He came up bitch in the game. Ask Rourke, he'll tell ya. :)

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

I didn't like the scheme overall -- it was too reminiscent of what they did last year to no avail -- but I was very pleased with a lot of the individual performances put up by our players. Individual performances can outshine a scheme, just as a scheme can hamstring excellent individual performances.

Pack93z
Select Member

14 years ago

#35

wpr, no kudo's to Dom Capers. He came up bitch in the game. Ask Rourke, he'll tell ya. :)

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

Disagree.. they were bringing players from all over.. Woodson corner blitzed at least 3 times that I can remember.. plus they were not rushing two exclusively at all.. can't think of too many plays were Matthews and Jones/Another Backer were sent..

"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"

zombieslayer
Registered

14 years ago

#36

I'm with Pack93z here. I thought Capers coached a fine game yesterday.

AP was hot. We did our best to contain him but what are you going to do? He was breaking tackles.

Favre only got sacked once because his release was so fast, which for us was a good thing as at least one of his INTs was because he got the ball off too quickly. We were getting in, much better than last year.

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

14 years ago

#37

Ironic as it may sound, I'm really pleased the defense gave up so many yards on the ground. To me it shows that the defense was focused more on stopping the pass and less focused on the run game. I don't mind if the other team grinds out a lot of yards on the ground. As long their passing attack is hamstrung, the Packers will win more often than not.

I didn't see as much of this game as I would have liked. I'm going to have to download it and watch it in its entirety.

DakotaT
Select Member

14 years ago

#38

Hawk should just sign an extension. He's a solid player, but has just not lived up to what we thought we had drafted. I don't think we have a $10M man on our defense, but we have a lot of fine football players.

porky88
Veteran Member

14 years ago

#39

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:

They correctly shadowed Randy Moss all game long. They weren't willing to let the deep pass beat them.

I think they contained Peterson quite well. I know he had his yards and touches, but he didn't break anything. Though he came close near the end there. He's the best runner of his generation. Defending him like this is the best thing they can do IMO.

http://www.row12.com/

nerdmann
Premier Member Topic Starter

14 years ago

#40

Love the Bishop/Hawk duo out there...shocked there are still some doubters of Hawk after the past couple of weeks.

Bishop can bring the boom...very exciting to watch.

"G-Force" wrote:

Hawk gets dragged for too many yards.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (19m) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (28m) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (40m) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (1h) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (1h) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (1h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (1h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (1h) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (1h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (3h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (3h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (3h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (4h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (4h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (4h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (4h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (4h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (4h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (4h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (4h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (4h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (4h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (4h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (4h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (4h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (4h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (4h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (4h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (4h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (4h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (4h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (4h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (5h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

packerfanoutwest (5h) : falcons are already ahead of us

beast (5h) : Packers will get in

beast (5h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen

packerfanoutwest (5h) : they still are in the playoffs

packerfanoutwest (5h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7

Zero2Cool (6h) : We can say it. We don't play.

Mucky Tundra (8h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints

Mucky Tundra (8h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games

Mucky Tundra (8h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.

buckeyepackfan (9h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.

Mucky Tundra (17h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan

beast (18h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings

bboystyle (18h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in

Mucky Tundra (21h) : Or ties, but let's be real here

Mucky Tundra (21h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses

Mucky Tundra (21h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch

buckeyepackfan (22h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS