zombieslayer
14 years ago
I am not a professional football player. I have never been and never will be. Nor have I ever been a professional coach (never got paid for it). But, I am a Historian and I know how to analyze stuff for what it's worth.

2007 was our best season with Mike McCarthy coaching. We went 14-4 and were a FG in OT away from the SB. Personally, I think we could have beaten the Patriots that year. We had a complete team and a lot of hunger. Just, not as much hunger as the Giants had.

In 2007, our O was MM's version of the WCO. It worked well. It kept us on the field and the opposing D off the field. We racked up lots of fantasy points for passing, but our running game was #21 (to which I say "we don't need no stinking running game.")

One thing that we all know the WCO does well is it sets up our WRs in a position to get YAC - yards after completion. If you have athletic WRs, which we do, you want to give them opportunities to catch the ball and run with it at full blast, just like Montana/Young to Rice.

It is 2010 now. Like 2007, we had a mediocre OL. Heck, Mike McCarthy teams have always had mediocre OLs. Didn't stop the '07 team though. Why? Because by the time defenses broke through the line, Driver, Jennings, or Jones was already running with the football.

The 2010 Mike McCarthy has evolved away from the WCO. We now try harder to set up the "big play." Heck, I like the long ball more than probably anyone else on this board, but you have to play to our strengths. Our OL sucks too much to set it up without a little bit of trickery (like we did in 2007).

Our top 3 WRs in 2007 are still our top 3 WRs today. Let's take a look.

Donald Driver


Year   YAC    YPG   YPC
2007   5.3     69.9   12.8
2008   4.9     63.3   13.7
2009   5.2     66.3   15.2
2010   2.6     55.2   11.0

Gregorious Jennings


2007   7.4     70.8   17.4
2008   4.8     80.8   16.2
2009   7.0     69.6   16.4
2010   2.2     36.6   13.1

James Jones


2007   4.7    42.3   14.4
2008   3.1    27.4   13.7
2009   6.1    27.5   15.2
2010   4.6    35.4   11.0

So as you can see, besides James Jones, the YAC has dropped off considerably. This needs to be fixed.
Mike McCarthy - loved you in 2007. You called some great games that year. Why break away from your strengths? Our OL sucks. It's not going to magically get better this year. Aaron Rodgers doesn't have the time to set up the deep ball. He's taking hits and already had his first concussion of the year.

Let's seriously consider going back to 2007. I know you want the deep ball. I do too. But the deep ball, you have to set up. You can't just want it.

You got 3 tremendous YAC WRs. Use them accordingly. When opposing Ds are getting burned for first down after first down and our Rodgers led offense starts getting in a rhythm, that's when you throw the deep ball.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
nerdmann
14 years ago
Agreed. They throw down the field too much, which imo contributes to drops. Easier to catch a ball thrown 5 yards than one thrown 50.
It would also be nice to be able to run screens.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
djcubez
14 years ago
I think a yards per completion/attempt would be a good stat to have up there as well. If you have 6.7 YAC with a 6.4 YAA you have a 13.1 Total Yardage. If the YAC dips to 3.4 but the YAA goes up to 9.3 you have a 12.7 Total Yardage, which is not as big of a drop-off in terms of total yards gained. I think you do have a point here but I'd like to see this statistic.
zombieslayer
14 years ago

I think a yards per completion/attempt would be a good stat to have up there as well. If you have 6.7 YAC with a 6.4 YAA you have a 13.1 Total Yardage. If the YAC dips to 3.4 but the YAA goes up to 9.3 you have a 12.7 Total Yardage, which is not as big of a drop-off in terms of total yards gained. I think you do have a point here but I'd like to see this statistic.

"djcubez" wrote:



Thanks for the suggestion.

Done.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
porky88
14 years ago
McCarthy always takes time to figure out his team. Once he realizes that we're not the New Orleans Saints, he'll change things up like he did after the Tampa Bay game of last season. That's when things will click. Question is are the Packers to injured to execute this offense or is he going to figure things out fast enough?
djcubez
14 years ago

I think a yards per completion/attempt would be a good stat to have up there as well. If you have 6.7 YAC with a 6.4 YAA you have a 13.1 Total Yardage. If the YAC dips to 3.4 but the YAA goes up to 9.3 you have a 12.7 Total Yardage, which is not as big of a drop-off in terms of total yards gained. I think you do have a point here but I'd like to see this statistic.

"zombieslayer" wrote:



Thanks for the suggestion.

Done.

"djcubez" wrote:



It makes the drop-offs seem not "as bad" but yea, I agree with you. We need to get back to our short YAC passing game.

It could be opposing defenses playing against us to prevent YAC. When a team starts using a tactic like YAC effectively defenses take notice and do what they can to prevent it. Either way it's not working like it used to.
evad04
14 years ago
Okay, okay, alright, alright -- can someone PLEASE substantiate the claim that this current offense throws the ball downfield a lot? And seriously -- there's a big difference between a 12-15 yard pass and forcing the 30+ yard ones.

C'mon.

Someone, please, do it.
William Henderson didn't have to run people over. His preferred method was levitation.
"I'm a reasonable man, get off my case."
14 years ago
Good stuff, zombie. Where do you even GET YAC stats??
zombieslayer
14 years ago

Good stuff, zombie. Where do you even GET YAC stats??

"get_louder_at_lambeau" wrote:



http://www.pro-football-reference.com  doesn't have YAC stats.

Dave - Would love to but I can't for the life of me find the stats. We've been taking a lot of shots down field this year but not completing any of them for whatever reason. I've seen drops, misses, interceptions, and penalties, but not completions.

If I can find stats for that, I'll gladly post them. I do not have footage of the games nor the time to watch them all and make notes.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Greg C.
14 years ago
I don't think the lack of YAC is due to the ball being thrown downfield too often. I think it's due to the receivers not having time to get separation because the pass blocking sucks. The lack of time for Rodgers to throw means that the DBs can sit on the short routes. And maybe the receivers are at fault too. Maybe they are just not doing as good a job at getting open. Even when Rodgers extends the play, they usually can't get very open.
blank
Fan Shout
Martha Careful (27m) : thank you Mucky for sticking up for me
Martha Careful (28m) : some of those people are smarter than you zero. However Pete Carroll is not
Mucky Tundra (3h) : Rude!
beast (4h) : Martha? 😋
Zero2Cool (8h) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.
dfosterf (10h) : I'm going with a combination of the two.
beast (12h) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury
beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State
beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
26m / Random Babble / Martha Careful

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.