Favre - Deadspin Story Update· Page 13

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

14 years ago

#121

Is there any tinkering in the database you can do to alleviate it?

RedSoxExcel
Registered

14 years ago

#122

I actually don't find the chick all that attractive. She has that dry, sallow complexion of a girl who spends entirely too much time in the tanning salon. She'll be wrinkled and saggy within ten years.

Not sexy.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:

Lol, who cares about her when she's in her 30's, we're talking about Favre hooking up with her in her prime, that would be pretty impressive for the old man and would make a lot of jealous (including me). It's not like Favre is marrying her or something.

blank

ILikeThePackers39
Registered

14 years ago

#123

If this turns out to be some kind of consentual affair, my first reaction would be WOW, good for Favre, she's SMOKING hot.

Then I would probably calm down and realize that he just ruined his marriage. But my initial reaction and I think 90% of objective males will be like "wow, good for him".

If it was just creepy texts that were unwanted, wow, weirdo.

"RedSoxExcel" wrote:

Bolded the part that matters. Texts, pictures, voicemails. Repeated. If unwanted and uninvited, that's a real problem, especially when it occurs in the workplace. And due to the NFL's public stance on harassment, they don't have much choice but to be diligent and rigorous in their investigation.

If it's consentual, then it's between him and his family, and all of this publicity is a real shame. If it's unwanted pressure, it could do some real damage beyond his private life. Wouldn't that be some shit.

blank

Formo
Veteran Member

14 years ago

#124

In the original Deadspin story, I thought Sterger didn't want her name hooked up to this in a way that the NFL would take action.

All Favre did with her, apparently, was leave messages and sent the infamous pics. She wanted nothing to do with him, and while she didn't defuse the situation in the beginning, I thought I remember her saying multiple times that she didn't want this going public and that it wasn't that big of a deal.

Someone bring up that link?

Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!

zombieslayer
Registered

14 years ago

#125

"Formo" wrote:

Someone probably already did but you'll have to go through 7 pages to find it. 😉

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

Wade
Veteran Member

14 years ago

#126

The more I see this story, the more I think we're all effin busybodies.

Okay, texting a pic of a personal body part is tacky and, if unsolicited, spam. And if I were the other woman (i.e. Deanna) I'd be seriously pissed, putting foot down, etc etc.

But the rest of us? Really. What business is it of ours what BF does or doesn't do with his dick via the Internet?

Last I knew no one has to open a text message. Frankly, if anyone sent me such a picture, they'd go immediately to the "do not open" list. I wish all the pinheads of the world were so easy to identify before opening.

Like those in "important offices" on campus who keep sending me spam that I have to open on the off chance that, unlike the last 100 times, they have something I have to take action on.

And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

14 years ago

#127

You have a "do not open" list? Mine gives me a thumbnail preview of the pic, often times it's too late. 😞

Wade
Veteran Member

14 years ago

#128

You have a "do not open" list? Mine gives me a thumbnail preview of the pic, often times it's too late. :(

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

Well, to be honest, I get so few texts that I don't keep a list..I just look at the sender's name and hit delete.

And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)

4PackGirl
Registered

14 years ago

#129

i think the only reason why some people are finding this amusing is on the off chance lord favre will be knocked off his pedestal - if only for a fleeting moment. i personally think it's deplorable on his part (IF he did it) to put his family through this. sickening.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

14 years ago

#130

It's going to blow over within weeks.

I don't care either way the more I think about it. Fixing to delete the Brett section all together and start a Barry Sanders one, there's a man worthy of such an honor.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Mucky Tundra (36m) : The Seattle Seahawks defeat the Chicago Bears 6-3. Jason Myers had 6 RBIs for Seattle while Cairo Santos had 3 RBI for Chicago

beast (1h) : Not nessarily, he might of been injured either way. He's playing about 50% of the games the last 4 years

Zero2Cool (7h) : If they'd been more patient with him, he'd be back already. Putting him out there vs Bears caused him to tweak it and here we are.

packerfanoutwest (7h) : well this is his last season with the PAck, book it

beast (9h) : Sounds like no Alexander (again), I'm wondering if his time with the Packers is done

Zero2Cool (15h) : Could ban beast and I still don't think anyone catches him.

Mucky Tundra (26-Dec) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore

packerfanoutwest (25-Dec) : Feliz Navidad!

Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!

beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁

beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won

Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS