Greg C.
14 years ago
After watching the Lions game on tape, I'd like to follow up on my complaints about the playcalling in three third and short situations. My postgame thread was merged into the official game thread, which I don't think is available anymore, so I'll just start a new one.

For starters, I'll say that I rarely complain about play calling, so this is not something I take lightly. My concern in this game was that I thought the Packers ran unnecessarily difficult plays in three third and short situations, all of which were unsuccessful. I got into a debate with Evad04 about this. He argued that the playcalling was okay, and that the problem was execution.

Here's another look at the plays and what I think of them after watching the game on tape.

1. The handoff to Kuhn who was running nearly parallel to the line of scrimmage. I still think this was a crap play. Rodgers was in the shotgun and handed the ball off in front of his body. This might be a good play for a scatback or a Marshall Faulk type, but not John Kuhn. He can make a slight cut without losing his momentum, but expecting him to make nearly a 90 degree cut and pick up a first down is a bit much.

2. Rodgers rolling out to his right in the first half and throwing incomplete to Jennings about 15 yards downfield. Finley was the primary receiver here, and he was covered, and the Lions had defenders in place to prevent Rodgers from scrambling. So I have to give the Lions credit here for defending a play that has worked well for the Packers this season.

3. Rodgers rolling to his right in the third quarter and throwing an interception on a pass intended for Jennings about 15 yards downfield. Evad was correct in pointing out that Donald Driver was open underneath, and that's where Rodgers should've thrown the ball.

So to sum up, I would say that two out of the three calls were not necessarily bad calls, and I give evad credit for pointing this out.

My larger concern, now that I think about it, is that possibly McCarthy does not have confidence in the O-line to hold their blocks long enough for Rodgers to drop back and go through his reads on third and short, so instead he is having Rodgers roll out, which limits his options. So maybe this is not so much a play calling problem as an offensive line problem. We'll see how it pans out as the season progresses.
blank
Finley88Beast
14 years ago


My larger concern, now that I think about it, is that possibly McCarthy does not have confidence in the O-line to hold their blocks long enough for Rodgers to drop back and go through his reads on third and short, so instead he is having Rodgers roll out, which limits his options. So maybe this is not so much a play calling problem as an offensive line problem. We'll see how it pans out as the season progresses.

"Greg C." wrote:



McCarthy has confidence in all his players I have no doubt about that.Look this game was bad for the offense in the 2nd half we barley got any time on the field.Most or some of those plays you mentioned was in the 2nd half the offense never got into a groove.Idk if MM was in a gameplan or not the 2nd half every coach can call bad plays I think that could be the case.But I would not put it into the categorie of him not having confidence in the line when he stated before again and again that he has faith in the players we got.
A Quote from my brother Mike(Bears Fan)
"Fucking Greg Jennings"
After he makes a catch
warhawk
14 years ago
I personally don't like it when I see Rodges rolling out. For one reason it doesn't ever work very well. I think when you cut the field in half it limits Rodgers too much and gives the defense less field and fewer WR's to worry about.

Aside from that I consider this last game as "unusual" as McCarthy put it and the offense never really got going. I think the Pack and Rodgers are traditionally at the top of 3rd down conversions and Rodgers completion rate on 3rd down is off the charts.

I am not really going to worry about one game that much when over the last couple of years we get better results out of third down than almost all the other teams.

I say just go with the play action pass on 3rd and short. That controls the rush because the D has to protect against the run and there are so many different things the O can do from there.
"The train is leaving the station."
Finley88Beast
14 years ago



Aside from that I consider this last game as "unusual" as McCarthy put it and the offense never really got going. I think the Pack and Rodgers are traditionally at the top of 3rd down conversions and Rodgers completion rate on 3rd down is off the charts.

I am not really going to worry about one game that much when over the last couple of years we get better results out of third down than almost all the other teams.

"warhawk" wrote:


Well said I agree with you here. +1
A Quote from my brother Mike(Bears Fan)
"Fucking Greg Jennings"
After he makes a catch
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
14 years ago
I don't know what that statistics are but I have felt that Rodgers has completed a number of passes to the left while rolling out right. JMO
UserPostedImage
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
14 years ago

I personally don't like it when I see Rodges rolling out. For one reason it doesn't ever work very well. I think when you cut the field in half it limits Rodgers too much and gives the defense less field and fewer WR's to worry about.

Aside from that I consider this last game as "unusual" as McCarthy put it and the offense never really got going. I think the Pack and Rodgers are traditionally at the top of 3rd down conversions and Rodgers completion rate on 3rd down is off the charts.

I am not really going to worry about one game that much when over the last couple of years we get better results out of third down than almost all the other teams.

I say just go with the play action pass on 3rd and short. That controls the rush because the D has to protect against the run and there are so many different things the O can do from there.

"warhawk" wrote:



Good points all.

But I wonder if part of the reason he rolls out as often as he does is either the play caller doesn't trust the OL enough, he has to because the OL hasn't done its job well enough, or a combination of both.

A few years ago, in my prePH days, before Voldemort v. Fleischer temporarily consumed the universe, I used to argue on another board that the reason the team seemed to good at not giving up sacks wasn't that the OL was good, but that Favre was doing a lot "outside the pocket". And Favre had nothing mobility-wise compared to Rodgers.

I'd rather have Rodgers rolling out less, for exactly the reasons you give. But I wonder whether there is actually an alternative now.
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
zombieslayer
14 years ago


My larger concern, now that I think about it, is that possibly McCarthy does not have confidence in the O-line to hold their blocks long enough for Rodgers to drop back and go through his reads on third and short, so instead he is having Rodgers roll out, which limits his options. So maybe this is not so much a play calling problem as an offensive line problem. We'll see how it pans out as the season progresses.

"Greg C." wrote:



Bam!

You just answered your own question. Thus is why we did #2 and #3. Kind of like castling in chess.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
lolleren
14 years ago

I don't know what that statistics are but I have felt that Rodgers has completed a number of passes to the left while rolling out right. JMO

"wpr" wrote:



I think he has been succesful in general when rolling to the right period. But alot of the succes is when he hits finley on a crossing pattern, and i think our opponents should start figuring that play out soon.
blank
Greg C.
14 years ago

I don't know what that statistics are but I have felt that Rodgers has completed a number of passes to the left while rolling out right. JMO

"lolleren" wrote:



I think he has been succesful in general when rolling to the right period. But alot of the succes is when he hits finley on a crossing pattern, and i think our opponents should start figuring that play out soon.

"wpr" wrote:



Yep. The Lions figured it out on play #2. The coaches need to add another wrinkle to keep defenses honest so that play can remain successful.
blank
Timmons
14 years ago
I'll add to that, not necessarily on the 3rd down play calling, but any down, and more so on the pre snap set. I HATE the empty back field. I mean, Fing give it away why don't you. We need to do more movement that screws the defense, not that gives out intentions away.

the only way I like the empty back field is if our receivers are clearing the field for Rodgers to run (which works well with a few deep routes). Otherwise, leave an RB in.

We need to employ good blocking receivers in motion around the LOS for run plays AND we need to design some plays that totally look like Run only to have Finley and Jennings spreading the field. Give me a 2 TE package, with both Finley and Quarless chip blocking and running routes... I'd like to see that.
blank
Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (15h) : Aaron Rodgers’s first pass of first team period was picked off
Mucky Tundra (20h) : tbh I didn't hear of his passing
Zero2Cool (20h) : Cosby Show. Malcom Jamal Warner I think is real name
Mucky Tundra (20h) : I was thinking of Ozzy and Hulk
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Who's Theo?
Zero2Cool (21h) : How is Theo alliteration?
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Bad week for people whose names are alliterations
Zero2Cool (23h) : Hulk Hogan gone too.
Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Oh, it's toe injury
Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Hope it's not serious. that would stink
dfosterf (24-Jul) : Sounds like an ankle not a knee for Fields
dfosterf (24-Jul) : Ya Flaccp on Browns
Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Maybe Tyrod Taylor instead
Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : He's on Browns, right?
dfosterf (24-Jul) : They would probably go with Flacco is my guess if Fields out
dfosterf (24-Jul) : Fleece 'em again!
Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Malik Willis might be someone Jets come after
packerfanoutwest (24-Jul) : Packers introduce 1923-inspired classic uniform, leather-look helmet
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Both LB Quay Walker and Rookie DB Micah Robinson have passed their physicals
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Happy to see site feels more snappy snappy
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : No sir. I did not.
dfosterf (23-Jul) : You didn't get free childcare when you were at work?
wpr (23-Jul) : These guys make hundreds of thousands of dollars a year. Pay for their own childcare.
dfosterf (23-Jul) : 2nd issue. Number 1 issue was no gameday childcare. 1 of 3 teams not providing it
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Suppose if locker room is main issue, we sitting pretty
wpr (23-Jul) : I thought so Mucky. In those useless player polls GB always rates high overall. Locker is a part of it.
Mucky Tundra (23-Jul) : Wasn't the locker room just updated like 6 or 7 years ago?
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : I have forum updated on different site. We'll see how this one goes before going to that
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Elgton Jenkins has a back injury, is expect to end contract dispute
wpr (23-Jul) : It's funny the PA complained about the locker room. It wasn't that long ago it was top shelf. Things change in a hurry.
wpr (23-Jul) : The site is much more better.
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : NFLPA report said Packers lockerroom needed upgrade. Whining bout where you change?
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : I saw that and thought it was kind of lame.
dfosterf (23-Jul) : Packers new locker room is pretty awesome. Great for morale, imo
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Shuffled things on the web server. Hope it makes it faster.
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Other times, it's turtle ass
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Sometimes it's snappy, like now.
beast (23-Jul) : I feel like it's loading at the top of the next minute, or something like that.
beast (23-Jul) : Also the thanks/heart takes FOREVER to load, and posting in the shout box takes three times FOREVER!
beast (23-Jul) : Thanks for saying something, I thought it was slow, but assumed it was on my end
beast (23-Jul) : Thanks for saying something, I thought it was slow, but assumed it was on my end
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Yeah, I noticed that too. Is it slow for PackerPeople.com too?
wpr (23-Jul) : I don't know what you IT guys call it but the page loading is very slow for me today.
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : SSL might be settled now.
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Still working through SSL cert issues
wpr (23-Jul) : Glad to be back
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : I think PH original finally working.
dfosterf (22-Jul) : Can tell you are having a fun day Kev
Zero2Cool (22-Jul) : Yep, I had to manually move them. It'll fix itself after more posts.
Mucky Tundra (22-Jul) : Same deal with the songs/videos thread, says you replied last but when I go there it's what I posted earlier is last
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

9h / Around The NFL / beast

19h / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

24-Jul / Around The NFL / beast

24-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

22-Jul / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

22-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

18-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.