Yes, they should run the old '07 game plan. Use quick, short passes to compensate for the lack of a running game. Why have they not tried to do something like this?
"evad04" wrote:
agreed. I was thinking the same thing all say long yesterday.
"wpr" wrote:
When was this? They didn't have the ball at all yesterday. When they did in the first half they were largely productive. In the second half Rodgers made an ill-advised throw to Jennings on the second possession. The second Rodgers INT was very close to being a huge downfield gain.
My point here is that Green Bay had the ball four times in the second half. A 3-and-out, two INTs, and the final drive.
When exactly were you having this thought all day long? If you were watching drive after drive capitulate to the defense I'd understand it. If you watched Green Bay stubbornly assert the run game with no success, I'd understand it. If you saw the Packers continually force the ball downfield, it'd make sense. That wasn't the case -- they barely touched the ball in the second half (after putting up 21 first half points).
"Chutzpah515" wrote: