I want to get this off my chest on here..· Page 6

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

14 years ago

Wellll.. Why didn't you just SAY so? I'm sure there's a few here that'll let you. I'm sorry, I'll have to bow out of the dick-wringing sweepstakes, as I am married. =P

"Formo" wrote:

Funny thing, many of those who partake in the internet flirting are married behind their screen. You wouldn't know it though by how they talk on the site to females.

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

14 years ago

#52

No, the real funny thing is that you seriously think our wives don't know we do this. Hell, half the time my wife is there watching me type, as is, for example, zombieslayer's. Flirts are fun. Flirts like women. Women like flirts. Women like being married to flirts. Women who like flirts are fun. Flirts like women who like flirts.

No matter what you might like to tell yourself, we're not sneaking around behind the backs of our significant others.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

14 years ago

#53

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:

Don't flatter yourself Rourke. You have no clue what I "seriously" am thinking. To enlighten you a bit, I would expect they know fully about what is said. Nothing wrong with flirting in my book, as I've always said. It doesn't matter where you build your appetite as long as you come home for dinner.

I do find it a bit interesting your defensive approach to your response though.

longtimefan
Registered

14 years ago

#54

Now your putting words in my mouth?

Actually since last 6 months I have no issues with you

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

You were absent from PH for about six months.

"longtimefan" wrote:

You are correct

Hence why I had no issues with him

Pack93z
Select Member

14 years ago

#55

This is an interesting "shitbox" full of ramblings of a thread.. the dynamics at work from the members of this forum is interesting, entertaining and well honestly a riot..

If anyone ever joins this forum.. they should be directed to this thread.. it speaks to the personality and traits of everyone that posted within this thread pretty truthfully and directly.

I love it.

"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

14 years ago

#56

You are correct

Hence why I had no issues with him

"longtimefan" wrote:

:onfloor:

That was freaking priceless.

Edit, you got 122'd.

longtimefan
Registered

14 years ago

#57

You are correct

Hence why I had no issues with him

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

:onfloor:

That was freaking priceless.

Edit, you got 122'd.

"longtimefan" wrote:

Sometimes my sarcastic nature doesnt get noticed till I point it out eh?

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

14 years ago

#58

Sometimes my sarcastic nature doesnt get noticed till I point it out eh?

"longtimefan" wrote:

The word selection is what made me hesitate on my suspicion.
"Actually since last 6 months I have no issues with you"

If you had said
"Actually for about 6 months I had no issues with you"

then I'd have known for sure. But the comment you said sounded like something happened six months ago that caused you to have no issues with him anymore, implying you still do not. But I suck with the English language so ... yeah ... I had to get clarification.

You're somewhat hard for me to read and understand at times, so instead of jumping off the cliff, I feel its better to be clear than to assume.

zombieslayer
Registered

14 years ago

#59

Funny thing, many of those who partake in the internet flirting are married behind their screen. You wouldn't know it though by how they talk on the site to females.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

My wife helps me edit the nude pictures I take of other women.

So flirting online is quite lightweight in our book.

We are not swingers though. We're just very 1970's, the most fun American decade since the 1920s.

Not bragging. That's just how we roll. By the way, she has partied harder than I have ever partied so it's not like it's a one-way street.

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

14 years ago

#60

You wouldn't know it though by how they talk on the site to females.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

This implies we don't act like married people, as if there is some "right" or "normal" way married people act. That's all I was saying.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

dfosterf (19m) : Mackelvie

dfosterf (20m) : Michael Macelvie- NFL teams know how to draft- Why don"t they?

dfosterf (22m) : Youtube

Zero2Cool (5h) : Packers were not selected for the 2025 Hall of Fame game.

dfosterf (7h) : PFOW Out of our division would be a good thing imo

Zero2Cool (9h) : Jameson Williams is done at 24 years old? What? He's a WR, not QB. I'm missing something here haha

wpr (9h) : Tomorrow is almost here.

packerfanoutwest (9h) : would you want him if Pack needed a back up qb?

packerfanoutwest (9h) : JW is done......stick a fork in him

Zero2Cool (11h) : You should. He goes to AFC that helps Packers.

packerfanoutwest (22h) : don't care

Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Lions shopping Jameson Williams?

packerfanoutwest (22-Apr) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.

Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat

wpr (22-Apr) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.

wpr (22-Apr) : now 3

Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Who? What?

beast (22-Apr) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?

Martha Careful (21-Apr) : meh

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast

wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.

wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!

dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am

wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days

beast (18-Apr) : 6 days

wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep

dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire

dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that

dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24