[OFFICIAL] Green Bay at Chicago· Page 10

MassPackersFan
Member

14 years ago

The pass interference call on Chilar was absolute bullshit. He never once touched the WR until after he secured possession of the ball, as the replay clearly showed.

MassPackersFan said this game was rigged. It's hard not to feel this way.

"xavierlee9" wrote:

...He caught the ball anyways. Who cares.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:

It's mighty revealing. TWO refs threw flags on a phantom PI call.

spicnspan320
Rookie

14 years ago

#92

Completely agreed, Nonstopdrivel. We would've had around 1:10 or something with 1 or 2 timeouts. Trying to stop them does absolutely nothing but get you in that position where a fg wins it.

blank

evad04
Member

14 years ago

#93

Let's hope the penalties were an aberration.

"IronMan" wrote:

Really? Seriously? Did you type that with a straight face?

"evad04" wrote:

My hoping that 17 penalties won't be the norm ... there's something wrong with that?

I don't need a history lesson, either. I'm aware of LAST season's problems (and for that matter, the problems in '08 and '07).

Still, I hope penalty woes of that magnitude will be an aberration for this season.

William Henderson didn't have to run people over. His preferred method was levitation.
"I'm a reasonable man, get off my case."

IronMan
Veteran Member

14 years ago

#94

Let's hope the penalties were an aberration.

"Silentio" wrote:

Really? Seriously? Did you type that with a straight face?

"IronMan" wrote:

?? IronMan hopes the penalties are going to a normal part of each game, I guess. There's nothing like Packer fans turning against the team after one loss.

"evad04" wrote:

No. I am just making the point that the penalties are NOT an aberration. Have you watched this team the last 2 years? #penaltymachine

Greg C.
Registered

14 years ago

#95

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:

I didn't get a good look at the call against Chillar. All of the other penalties looked completely obvious, though, as far as I can remember. So I don't think the game was rigged unless the Packers lost on purpose.

blank

porky88
Veteran Member

14 years ago

#96

I was hoping they'd throw the flag on Woodson's last INT. I didn't see a replay but I tohuhg he caught it, ran, fumbled, and recovered.

"millertime" wrote:

I agree. It was an INT IMO. But I believe Chicago recovered the ball on the field of play so it would've been Bears' football.

http://www.row12.com/

nerdmann
Premier Member

14 years ago

#97

We beat ourselves with more than just penalties. We've played down to the competition for the third week in a row.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

Cheesey
Preferred Member

14 years ago

#98

There's no getting around it. WE SUCKED the game away.I hope MM kicks our own asses all week.SHOULD have been an easy win.
We are better then they are, but self destructed at every turn.

RedSoxExcel
Registered

14 years ago

#99

millertime, I wanted to see a replay of that. I don't understand ESPN's coverage, they have so many shots in between plays of Cutler and Rodgers walking around instead of showing replays. I don't know if they do it just so we can hear more of Gruden talking about nothing.

That play, I'm pretty sure they didn't even show a replay of Woodson's attempted catch. How can you not at least show a replay (I stand to be corrected if they did).

Edit, I just rewatched it on PVR, they showed Woodson walking around instead of showing a replay of it. Unreal.

blank

spicnspan320
Rookie

14 years ago

#100

Plus the fumble early on which was called down by contact was a big chance for us to go up by more early if given the chance to recover it...

blank

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

dfosterf (5m) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount

dfosterf (6m) : Trade, cut or keep

dfosterf (1h) : that from Jaire

dfosterf (1h) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'

Zero2Cool (1h) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"

dfosterf (1h) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it

Zero2Cool (1h) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.

dfosterf (1h) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent

dfosterf (1h) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility

dfosterf (1h) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission

dfosterf (1h) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers

Zero2Cool (1h) : That someone ... likely the agent.

Zero2Cool (1h) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.

Zero2Cool (1h) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.

Zero2Cool (2h) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.

dfosterf (3h) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"

dfosterf (3h) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that

dfosterf (3h) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?

Zero2Cool (19h) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.

dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move

dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what

Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife

Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately

Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.

dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.

Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Guessing they probably knew. Did he have cast or something on?

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : Did they know that at the time or was that something the realized afterwards?

Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Van Ness played most of season with broken thumb

wpr (9-Apr) : yay

Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Mark Murphy says Steelers likely to protect Packers game. Meaning, no Ireland

Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Struggling to figure out what text editor options are needed and which are 'nice to have'

Mucky Tundra (8-Apr) : *CHOMP CHOMP CHOMP*

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : WR who said he'd break Xavier Worthy 40 time...and ran slower than you

Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Who?

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Texas’ WR Isaiah Bond is scheduled to visit the Bills, Browns, Chiefs, Falcons, Packers and Titans starting next week.

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Spotting ball isn't changing, only measuring distance is, Which wasn't the issue.

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : The spotting of the ball IS the issue. Not the chain gang.

Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Will there be a tracker on the ball or something?

Zero2Cool (1-Apr) : uh oh

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24

Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM

Eagles

10 - 22