[OFFICIAL] Green Bay at Chicago· Page 10

MassPackersFan
Member

14 years ago

The pass interference call on Chilar was absolute bullshit. He never once touched the WR until after he secured possession of the ball, as the replay clearly showed.

MassPackersFan said this game was rigged. It's hard not to feel this way.

"xavierlee9" wrote:

...He caught the ball anyways. Who cares.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:

It's mighty revealing. TWO refs threw flags on a phantom PI call.

spicnspan320
Rookie

14 years ago

#92

Completely agreed, Nonstopdrivel. We would've had around 1:10 or something with 1 or 2 timeouts. Trying to stop them does absolutely nothing but get you in that position where a fg wins it.

blank

evad04
Member

14 years ago

#93

Let's hope the penalties were an aberration.

"IronMan" wrote:

Really? Seriously? Did you type that with a straight face?

"evad04" wrote:

My hoping that 17 penalties won't be the norm ... there's something wrong with that?

I don't need a history lesson, either. I'm aware of LAST season's problems (and for that matter, the problems in '08 and '07).

Still, I hope penalty woes of that magnitude will be an aberration for this season.

William Henderson didn't have to run people over. His preferred method was levitation.
"I'm a reasonable man, get off my case."

IronMan
Veteran Member

14 years ago

#94

Let's hope the penalties were an aberration.

"Silentio" wrote:

Really? Seriously? Did you type that with a straight face?

"IronMan" wrote:

?? IronMan hopes the penalties are going to a normal part of each game, I guess. There's nothing like Packer fans turning against the team after one loss.

"evad04" wrote:

No. I am just making the point that the penalties are NOT an aberration. Have you watched this team the last 2 years? #penaltymachine

Greg C.
Registered

14 years ago

#95

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:

I didn't get a good look at the call against Chillar. All of the other penalties looked completely obvious, though, as far as I can remember. So I don't think the game was rigged unless the Packers lost on purpose.

blank

porky88
Veteran Member

14 years ago

#96

I was hoping they'd throw the flag on Woodson's last INT. I didn't see a replay but I tohuhg he caught it, ran, fumbled, and recovered.

"millertime" wrote:

I agree. It was an INT IMO. But I believe Chicago recovered the ball on the field of play so it would've been Bears' football.

http://www.row12.com/

nerdmann
Premier Member

14 years ago

#97

We beat ourselves with more than just penalties. We've played down to the competition for the third week in a row.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

Cheesey
Preferred Member

14 years ago

#98

There's no getting around it. WE SUCKED the game away.I hope MM kicks our own asses all week.SHOULD have been an easy win.
We are better then they are, but self destructed at every turn.

RedSoxExcel
Registered

14 years ago

#99

millertime, I wanted to see a replay of that. I don't understand ESPN's coverage, they have so many shots in between plays of Cutler and Rodgers walking around instead of showing replays. I don't know if they do it just so we can hear more of Gruden talking about nothing.

That play, I'm pretty sure they didn't even show a replay of Woodson's attempted catch. How can you not at least show a replay (I stand to be corrected if they did).

Edit, I just rewatched it on PVR, they showed Woodson walking around instead of showing a replay of it. Unreal.

blank

spicnspan320
Rookie

14 years ago

#100

Plus the fumble early on which was called down by contact was a big chance for us to go up by more early if given the chance to recover it...

blank

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

TheKanataThrilla (7h) : Hope to see everyone in the Chat tonight!!! Go Pack Go!!!

TheKanataThrilla (7h) : Jeanty would be a great pick-up for the Bears. I see Warren mocked to them as well who I think would be a great selection.

Zero2Cool (8h) : GameDay Chat is open. Posting bits an tids in there.

Zero2Cool (8h) : Excellent Source: The Bears have a deal in place to move up to 5 if Jeanty is there.

Zero2Cool (9h) : Probably not until 10pm will be making pick

dfosterf (10h) : But it is still not tonight. Lol

wpr (10h) : Today is finally here.

dfosterf (11h) : I should have put it in quotes

dfosterf (11h) : It is the title of a you tube video.

dfosterf (11h) : I'm not assuming anything

beast (17h) : If they aren't doing it, then why are you assuming they know how to do it?

dfosterf (23h) : Mackelvie

dfosterf (23h) : Michael Macelvie- NFL teams know how to draft- Why don"t they?

dfosterf (23h) : Youtube

Zero2Cool (23-Apr) : Packers were not selected for the 2025 Hall of Fame game.

dfosterf (23-Apr) : PFOW Out of our division would be a good thing imo

Zero2Cool (23-Apr) : Jameson Williams is done at 24 years old? What? He's a WR, not QB. I'm missing something here haha

wpr (23-Apr) : Tomorrow is almost here.

packerfanoutwest (23-Apr) : would you want him if Pack needed a back up qb?

packerfanoutwest (23-Apr) : JW is done......stick a fork in him

Zero2Cool (23-Apr) : You should. He goes to AFC that helps Packers.

packerfanoutwest (23-Apr) : don't care

Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Lions shopping Jameson Williams?

packerfanoutwest (22-Apr) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.

Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat

wpr (22-Apr) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.

wpr (22-Apr) : now 3

Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Who? What?

beast (22-Apr) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?

Martha Careful (21-Apr) : meh

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast

wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.

wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!

dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am

wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days

beast (18-Apr) : 6 days

wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep

dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire

dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24