Rockmolder
14 years ago
While Clay Matthews shines, A.J. Hawk is nowhere to be found 

By Gregg Rosenthal

Packers linebacker Clay Matthews shook off his inactive preseason like he shook off Eagles blockers Sunday, leading the Green Bay defense during a superlative defense.

Matthews finished with two sacks, a forced fumble, and seven tackles, including the game-clinching stuff of Michael Vick.

"There's a lot of rust I need to shake off. It was a good way to start the season, let's just leave it at that," Mathews said after the game.

While the team's 2009 first-round pick built off his fabulous rookie season, the No. 4 overall pick didn't play a single snap on defense. A.J. Hawk only plays in Green Bay's base defense. Since the Packers played in their nickel or dime packages all day, Hawk only played on special teams.

Hawk's lack of a role on passing downs is nothing new. But it still says something when a guy making $4.6 million doesn't play a snap on defense all day.

It also says we should probably change our definition of what's a "base defense" in today's NFL.

Since69
14 years ago
Hawk plays in the base defense - we were in the nickel all day. That's why Chillar was in and Hawk wasn't.

Hawk will rip some heads off next week against the Bills...
UserPostedImage
peteralan71
14 years ago

Hawk will rip some heads off next week against the Bills...

"Since69" wrote:



Not so sure I agree with you on that one. Hawk started his career at GB with energy and a killer attitude, but since then he has dwindled considerably. His tackles for the last four yrs have been 119, 105, 86, and 89. I just don't think that he'll have another killer year, esp with CM3 being a freak, and Brad Jones coming up in the ranks.
Green Bay: Home of the Green & Gold. And the hunter orange. And the camouflage.
UserPostedImage
evad04
14 years ago

Hawk will rip some heads off next week against the Bills...

"peteralan71" wrote:



Not so sure I agree with you on that one. Hawk started his career at GB with energy and a killer attitude, but since then he has dwindled considerably. His tackles for the last four yrs have been 119, 105, 86, and 89. I just don't think that he'll have another killer year, esp with CM3 being a freak, and Brad Jones coming up in the ranks.

"Since69" wrote:


Once again, there's an explanation for the decline in tackles. Green Bay plays a significant amount of sub packages (five DBs) on defense. Hawk has played some in the nickel packages, but he's predominantly used as a ILB in their base 3-4 defense.

When he was drafted, he played OLB in a base 4-3. He also played in a greater portion of sub packages.

What is there NOT to understand? He isn't on the field as much, hence the decline in tackles.

This article -- hell, this overall perception -- about Hawk is already tiring and we just finished week 1. I firmly believe that if you went into McCarthy's office, or Capers' office, or Kevin Greene's office and asked them about A.J. Hawk they would have positive things to say. You wouldn't here, "Well, Matthews looked great out there today. A.J. didn't."

Two long-locked blonde LBs who DON'T PLAY THE SAME POSITION sure are compared a lot to one another -- and unnecessarily if you ask me. Rosenthal sure did his homework. Didn't know Hawk went 4th in the draft :crazy:
William Henderson didn't have to run people over. His preferred method was levitation.
"I'm a reasonable man, get off my case."
Zero2Cool
14 years ago
Winston Moss would be whom you'd talk to about Hawk, not our OLB coach, Kevin Greene. 😛
UserPostedImage
bozz_2006
14 years ago

Hawk will rip some heads off next week against the Bills...

"evad04" wrote:



Not so sure I agree with you on that one. Hawk started his career at GB with energy and a killer attitude, but since then he has dwindled considerably. His tackles for the last four yrs have been 119, 105, 86, and 89. I just don't think that he'll have another killer year, esp with CM3 being a freak, and Brad Jones coming up in the ranks.

"peteralan71" wrote:


Once again, there's an explanation for the decline in tackles. Green Bay plays a significant amount of sub packages (five DBs) on defense. Hawk has played some in the nickel packages, but he's predominantly used as a ILB in their base 3-4 defense.

When he was drafted, he played OLB in a base 4-3. He also played in a greater portion of sub packages.

What is there NOT to understand? He isn't on the field as much, hence the decline in tackles.

This article -- hell, this overall perception -- about Hawk is already tiring and we just finished week 1. I firmly believe that if you went into McCarthy's office, or Capers' office, or Kevin Greene's office and asked them about A.J. Hawk they would have positive things to say. You wouldn't here, "Well, Matthews looked great out there today. A.J. didn't."

Two long-locked blonde LBs who DON'T PLAY THE SAME POSITION sure are compared a lot to one another -- and unnecessarily if you ask me. Rosenthal sure did his homework. Didn't know Hawk went 4th in the draft :crazy:

"Since69" wrote:



So, uh, why do you think he's not being played? :crazy: Yeah, if he was on the field more, he'd get more tackles. But if he was one of our best options at LB, he'd get his PT. I am sure you're right. If you ask the coaches about Hawk's play, they'd say positive things... because his play is one dimensional. They've already tested the theory and it's held true. They'd have positive things to say about the one role they have for him. He is good at eating up blockers. If you specifically asked the coaches about his blitzing, pursuit, or pass coverage do you really think they'd have positive things to say? If they did, he'd have seen more than zero defensive plays yesterday.
UserPostedImage
porky88
14 years ago
The had to play nickel. They didn't have enough defensive lineman to play base and you can't play base vs. Mike Vick.
http://www.row12.com/ 
reggie
evad04
14 years ago

Hawk will rip some heads off next week against the Bills...

"bozz_2006" wrote:



Not so sure I agree with you on that one. Hawk started his career at GB with energy and a killer attitude, but since then he has dwindled considerably. His tackles for the last four yrs have been 119, 105, 86, and 89. I just don't think that he'll have another killer year, esp with CM3 being a freak, and Brad Jones coming up in the ranks.

"evad04" wrote:


Once again, there's an explanation for the decline in tackles. Green Bay plays a significant amount of sub packages (five DBs) on defense. Hawk has played some in the nickel packages, but he's predominantly used as a ILB in their base 3-4 defense.

When he was drafted, he played OLB in a base 4-3. He also played in a greater portion of sub packages.

What is there NOT to understand? He isn't on the field as much, hence the decline in tackles.

This article -- hell, this overall perception -- about Hawk is already tiring and we just finished week 1. I firmly believe that if you went into McCarthy's office, or Capers' office, or Kevin Greene's office and asked them about A.J. Hawk they would have positive things to say. You wouldn't here, "Well, Matthews looked great out there today. A.J. didn't."

Two long-locked blonde LBs who DON'T PLAY THE SAME POSITION sure are compared a lot to one another -- and unnecessarily if you ask me. Rosenthal sure did his homework. Didn't know Hawk went 4th in the draft :crazy:

"peteralan71" wrote:



So, uh, why do you think he's not being played? :crazy: Yeah, if he was on the field more, he'd get more tackles. But if he was one of our best options at LB, he'd get his PT. I am sure you're right. If you ask the coaches about Hawk's play, they'd say positive things... because his play is one dimensional. They've already tested the theory and it's held true. They'd have positive things to say about the one role they have for him. He is good at eating up blockers. If you specifically asked the coaches about his blitzing, pursuit, or pass coverage do you really think they'd have positive things to say? If they did, he'd have seen more than zero defensive plays yesterday.

"Since69" wrote:


I don't agree with your assessment about Hawk's ability. Hawk is not Green Bay's best option for nickel defense. That doesn't mean he isn't a nice option at LB -- it means for defenses that feature only 2 LBs (you can essentially count the OLBs with their hands in the dirt as DEs) he isn't the best option.

Hawk had a solid year in '09. Yeah, not super flashy, but an improvement upon '08 no doubt.

But hey, let's trade him and stick Desmond Bishop in there, knowing as we do that he's an absolute dynamo and NEVER looks bad in coverage.
William Henderson didn't have to run people over. His preferred method was levitation.
"I'm a reasonable man, get off my case."
LambeauEast
14 years ago
I want the 11 best guys defensively on the field that I do the offense. If our best 11 for any situation doesn't include A.J., then I'm good with it. He will get his time, and do so effectively, but until then....let it ride!
UserPostedImage
go.pack.go.
14 years ago
I hate people that hate on Hawk. What did he do that is making people so mad at him? He has been a solid linebacker for us every since he got here, and he has been a pro about everything. You don't see him complaining about not getting a lot of playing time, do you?
UserPostedImage
Similar Topics
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    Zero2Cool (5h) : NFL thought it would get more attention week preceding Super Bowl.
    Zero2Cool (5h) : Yes, the Pro Bowl. It was played Sunday before Super Bowl from 2010-2022
    packerfanoutwest (5h) : pro bowl
    Zero2Cool (5h) : From 2010 to 2022, it was played on the Sunday before the Super Bowl
    Zero2Cool (5h) : They moved it to the BYE week before Super Bowl several years ago.
    packerfanoutwest (5h) : it was always after the SB.....
    beast (15h) : Though I stop following pro bowl years ago
    beast (15h) : I thought the pro game was before the Super Bowl?
    packerfanoutwest (15h) : ok now for the Pro Bowl Game in Hawaii
    TheKanataThrilla (16h) : If I was Philly I would try to end it instead of punting it
    Mucky Tundra (16h) : VICTORY! We have (moral) victory!
    TheKanataThrilla (16h) : Hey they mentioned that we 3-peted
    Mucky Tundra (17h) : seems to me the 49ers should have traded Aiyuk when they had the chance
    Mucky Tundra (17h) : if the Eagles get it down to the 1, do they Tush Push or give it to Barkley?
    TheKanataThrilla (17h) : 49ers have a money problem if they want to sign their QB
    Mucky Tundra (17h) : Wait for real? Didn't he just get an extension two years ago?
    Zero2Cool (17h) : 49ers gonna trade Deebo. Interesting
    TheKanataThrilla (17h) : Replays always never seem to show the holdings
    TheKanataThrilla (17h) : Great throw by Hurts
    Mucky Tundra (17h) : Where Carter falls prey to bad off the field influences (to be clear, not saying he'd clip someone though)
    Mucky Tundra (17h) : Had Carter not gone to Philly were they already had a lot of old college friends, he ends up in a similar spot to Aaron Hernandez
    Mucky Tundra (17h) : I think some of his coaches told scouts to stay away
    Mucky Tundra (17h) : the street racing incident+conditioning and motivation problems
    beast (17h) : Then Carter was street racing, where the other car crashed and people died... and other teams were scared to pick Carter for some reason
    beast (17h) : I think the Saints traded up, giving their next year 1st to the Eagles, and then they sucked and Eagles got the 10th overall pick
    packerfanoutwest (17h) : wtf Barkley?
    TheKanataThrilla (18h) : Getting Carter and Nolan Smith in the first round in 2023 was pretty darn good
    Mucky Tundra (18h) : for some reason i'm thinking of a draft where the Eagles where in the mid 20s and a top player fell all the way to them
    TheKanataThrilla (18h) : I think so. I would need to look it up. Think it may have been Carolina's pick.
    Mucky Tundra (18h) : i'm not sure who i'm thinking of now
    Mucky Tundra (18h) : oh fuck me i messed that up
    Zero2Cool (18h) : Jordan Davis was 13th overall
    Zero2Cool (18h) : Carter was 9th overall
    Zero2Cool (18h) : Eagles had 15th and 10th selections, moved to 13 and 9 to get Davis and Carter back to back
    Zero2Cool (18h) : Eagles traded up for Carter, didn't they?
    Mucky Tundra (18h) : Obviously he was a huge risk but getting a top 5 talent on the dline in the mid 20s is fortuitous
    Mucky Tundra (18h) : Jalen Carter falling into their lap certainly helps
    TheKanataThrilla (18h) : And we could only wish to have this type of D
    TheKanataThrilla (18h) : It's not like Philly has had low draft picks, but has managed to get themselves a top notch pass rush. We spend so much draft capital of D
    packerfanoutwest (18h) : another crap halftime show
    TheKanataThrilla (18h) : I think it is over, but then I think of Atlanta and want Philly to go in with the same intensity in the second half
    Mucky Tundra (18h) : And with a Pass Rush that might as well be on a milk cartoon and no Jaire
    Martha Careful (18h) : I cant help but feel good about how well the Packers D played in Philly during the playoffs
    Mucky Tundra (18h) : this game is over
    Mucky Tundra (18h) : This might be the kill shot here
    Mucky Tundra (18h) : oh that's such a bad penalty for KC after getting the 3rd down stop
    TheKanataThrilla (19h) : Philly DL has come to play
    TheKanataThrilla (19h) : Ceoper DeJean with the INT scored...bad memories of draft night
    Mucky Tundra (19h) : ok scratch that
    Mucky Tundra (19h) : Game feels like last years Super Bowl: 49ers started off in control, moved the ball well but didn't have much of a lead to show for it
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    29 - 34
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    16 - 10
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    30 - 14
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    29 - 31
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    24 - 19
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    34 - 13
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    24 - 22
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    30 - 27
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    14 - 24
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    20 - 19
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    38 - 10
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    30 - 17
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    31 - 34
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    30 - 13
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    34 - 0
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
    Vikings
    25 - 27
    Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    22 - 24
    Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
    Eagles
    10 - 22
    Recent Topics
    7m / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

    8m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

    7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    15h / Random Babble / packerfanoutwest

    22h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    9-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / dhazer

    7-Feb / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

    4-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    4-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    4-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / earthquake

    4-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / earthquake

    1-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    1-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    29-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.