Pack93z
14 years ago
Either side building any burden of proof from the preseason is nonsense.. fortunately we get to play them twice and it will be answered upon the field.

We have serious questions on our defense.. they have some there as well as on offense.. and don't kid yourself.. we have questions on offense as well.. two that pop are the running game and will our tackles be able to handle speed on turf this season thus allowing our offense to function.

All this chest puffing on both sides 3 games into the preseason is nonsense.. at least in my opinion.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
ILikeThePackers39
14 years ago

For the life of me, though, I cannot figure out why he is advertising the problems with his ankle. If he's hoping that talking up his vulnerability will prompt NFL officials to go easy on him, that might work. But I doubt it will provoke defensive coordinators to take pity on him and dial back the pressure (and if it does, shame on them and they need to be fired). Other than a few concessions from officials, I don't see what he has to gain from this tactic.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:




As others have noted, the sense is that he's downplaying expectations - giving himself an excuse to fail. I think that's iffy, but no matter what his motivation is, I think that not it'll not only fail to get opposing Ds to back off, it'll more likely give them all a target to aim for. I have no doubt that NO provided the blueprint last season that other teams will follow - sell out to get the old man, and then hit him hard when you have the chance. And with that line the way it's looking now, he'd better hope he can still scoot on that ankle, because he's going to need to do so.
blank
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
14 years ago
If Favre goes down to injury, the Vikings are hosed.
If Rodgers goes down to injury, the Packers are hosed.

This division will come down to which team has the best OL.

To the extent that preseason matters, so far it looks like that is GB.
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Packers_Finland
14 years ago
Preseason doesn't mean shit. I'd take the Vikes offensive line any day regardless of how the Packers OL has looked.
This is a placeholder
RedSoxExcel
14 years ago

As others have noted, the sense is that he's downplaying expectations - giving himself an excuse to fail. I think that's iffy, but no matter what his motivation is, I think that not it'll not only fail to get opposing Ds to back off, it'll more likely give them all a target to aim for. I have no doubt that NO provided the blueprint last season that other teams will follow - sell out to get the old man, and then hit him hard when you have the chance. And with that line the way it's looking now, he'd better hope he can still scoot on that ankle, because he's going to need to do so.

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:



I really don't understand this whole "Saints figured out how to beat Brett" theory. If that strategy is to blitz him and hit him late and hard, I think thats something that probably beats most QBs. If it was that easy to blitz him and that easy to get late hits in, why didn't people just do that all year. Why wouldn't you do that to every QB in the league - hit him hard?

Brett's age is a big negative in most categories but its a plus in experience. Whatever you think of the guy, he's seen everything in terms of defenses and reads it. I remember last year after the 2nd GB game, Woodson they blitzed a lot and he read it each time or got rid of the ball.

I think people overstate how well the Saints defense played that game. I looked it up, the Vikings had 31 first downs to the Saints 15. 475 total yards of offense. 310 yards passing and TOP advantage of 10 minutes. They fumbled the ball FIVE times. And all of that was on the road.

I still think the best way to beat Favre (and its one of few ways) is to get the lead and make him play from behind. He'll make stupid decisions to try to get the team back into it and then you take the INTs.

I really don't understand this whole Saints thing because why isn't every time in the NFL trying to do that to every QB. Whether your 40 or your 25, its going to hurt and I don't think they are going to let that stuff that went down the Saints go in the regular season. If someone can explain this theory to me, I'd be thankful. May be I am missing something?

EVEN with all of those late hits and everything, they were still a 12th man in the huddle penalty from possibily WINNING the game. Favre led the Vikings to the 35 yard line on that last drive AFTER this "blueprint to beat Favre".
blank
Zero2Cool
14 years ago
Get Brett to play from behind. Why? Because he doesn't have confidence in his team to pull it out no matter what he says. Actions speak louder than words. He's alluded to this theory several times. Most notably during his retirement speech, the first one that is, by saying living up to Brett Favre is just too hard. He also questioned whether he wanted the ball in the final two minutes. Why? Because he didn't feel he could shoulder the team to victory as he feels he has to.

Even at 40, 41, if Brett relies on his TEAM to pull HIM through, he'll be dangerous. For some reason or other, late in the game, or post season games, he gets overwhelmed with a feeling that he needs to win it for the team, instead of providing an avenue for the team to win it for the ... team.

Against the Saints last year. Tuck it down, run/hobble it forward as much as you can, or out of bounds. Let Ryan kick the FG to win the game. That would have been the smart, veteran play. I'd trust the leg of Ryan anywhere within 55 yards in a dome.

I know what I'm trying to say, surely I failed in expressing it accurately though.
UserPostedImage
RedSoxExcel
14 years ago

Get Brett to play from behind. Why? Because he doesn't have confidence in his team to pull it out no matter what he says. Actions speak louder than words. He's alluded to this theory several times. Most notably during his retirement speech, the first one that is, by saying living up to Brett Favre is just too hard. He also questioned whether he wanted the ball in the final two minutes. Why? Because he didn't feel he could shoulder the team to victory as he feels he has to.

Even at 40, 41, if Brett relies on his TEAM to pull HIM through, he'll be dangerous. For some reason or other, late in the game, or post season games, he gets overwhelmed with a feeling that he needs to win it for the team, instead of providing an avenue for the team to win it for the ... team.

Against the Saints last year. Tuck it down, run/hobble it forward as much as you can, or out of bounds. Let Ryan kick the FG to win the game. That would have been the smart, veteran play. I'd trust the leg of Ryan anywhere within 55 yards in a dome.

I know what I'm trying to say, surely I failed in expressing it accurately though.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



I don't know if you are responding to me but I am agreeing, the best strategy is to make him play from behind.

I am curious about the whole "Saints Blueprint" thing because the Vikings put up 300+ passing yards, 450+ total offense, 31 first downs, had 5 fumbles and were still a 12th man in the huddle from having a 50 yard FG to win the game in regulation.
blank
Zero2Cool
14 years ago

Get Brett to play from behind. Why? Because he doesn't have confidence in his team to pull it out no matter what he says. Actions speak louder than words. He's alluded to this theory several times. Most notably during his retirement speech, the first one that is, by saying living up to Brett Favre is just too hard. He also questioned whether he wanted the ball in the final two minutes. Why? Because he didn't feel he could shoulder the team to victory as he feels he has to.

Even at 40, 41, if Brett relies on his TEAM to pull HIM through, he'll be dangerous. For some reason or other, late in the game, or post season games, he gets overwhelmed with a feeling that he needs to win it for the team, instead of providing an avenue for the team to win it for the ... team.

Against the Saints last year. Tuck it down, run/hobble it forward as much as you can, or out of bounds. Let Ryan kick the FG to win the game. That would have been the smart, veteran play. I'd trust the leg of Ryan anywhere within 55 yards in a dome.

I know what I'm trying to say, surely I failed in expressing it accurately though.

"RedSoxExcel" wrote:



I don't know if you are responding to me but I am agreeing, the best strategy is to make him play from behind.

I am curious about the whole "Saints Blueprint" thing because the Vikings put up 300+ passing yards, 450+ total offense, 31 first downs, had 5 fumbles and were still a 12th man in the huddle from having a 50 yard FG to win the game in regulation.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



I've never once said the Saints found a blueprint to beat Brett. I've said several times, there is NO blueprint to beat him. No one strategy other than the one outlined above will give a team a chance. Anyone playing Brett needs to get the lead and hit him hard and often. That is the best strategy, gameplan, whatever you want to call it beat him. The problem is getting to Brett before he zips the ball out and scorches your defense with short quick passes.
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
14 years ago
The Saints Blueprint is just cheap jargon for the Talking Heads.. the recipe for Brett has always been the same.

Pressure him and put him in decision making mode on the fly.. it forces him to gamble.. with mixed results. But it opens up the chance for him to make the critical mistake.. like he has made many times in his career.. not as many as the risks he succeeded in.. but the odds go up in your favor if you pressure him and force him into trying to "win it".

Guy is the ultimate competitor, one in which I have only seen him wave the flag twice without leaving it all on the field. Which drives him to try and win it at all costs.. including not banking on his teammates to win it for him.

Elway eventually caved to it, allowing him to capture 2 titles.. I don't think Brett's makeup will allow him to do the same.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Stevetarded
14 years ago

WARNING: We are are WAY too overconfident about the Vikings demise.

What is the difference between the beginning of last season and this season? Did everyone expect Sidney Rice to blow up like that? No, so what makes you think this year someone like Harvin or Berrian or Shanicoe or Camarillo or whatever might not do the same.

As much as everyone hates Favre, he makes receivers play well (e.g., Rice and Shanicoe last year). Irregardless of Favre, they have AP! He's hard to stop if he's on.

They won the division two years ago with basically no WRs and no QB!

Quick, someone go nuts because I see the division objectively!

"RedSoxExcel" wrote:



None of them has nearly the same skill set Rice has. Sure Favre may help them out but a lot of what I saw last year it was Rice who was helping Favre.

AP may be hard to stop but their o-line doesn't look any better at run blocking so I'd expect him to probably struggle again.
blank
Fan Shout
wpr (4h) : I thought KC already won
Zero2Cool (15h) : If you wanna post about the Super Bowl, please, by all means, open a topic. They are free this month! 😁
Zero2Cool (15h) : There doesn't need to be a topic. There's a playoff prediction thread.
packerfanoutwest (15h) : and there no SB contest over in the other Packer forum, either
buckeyepackfan (15h) : #2Officially Retires!
beast (15h) : Probably no SB topic as people are wore out talking about the Chiefs, Refs and Eagles
Zero2Cool (15h) : Packers reportedly have their new LB coach, promoting Sean Duggan to that role
Zero2Cool (20h) : WR Cooper Kupp is being traded.
packerfanoutwest (4-Feb) : why is there no SB Prediction topic?
Zero2Cool (3-Feb) : Anthony Perkins spent 2024 as a defensive quality-control coach with the Packers.
Zero2Cool (3-Feb) : Packers lose another assistant.
Zero2Cool (3-Feb) : Defensive Player of the Year and Browns star Myles Garrett has requested a trade.
Zero2Cool (3-Feb) : deleted all my browser history and autofill and passwords. gonna be fun!
packerfanoutwest (3-Feb) : too funny
packerfanoutwest (3-Feb) : Lions QB Jared Goff was the offensive MVP
packerfanoutwest (3-Feb) : for the Pro Bowl, which is flag football
Zero2Cool (2-Feb) : Rather, the murder WAS covered up to prevent ...
Zero2Cool (2-Feb) : JFK murder was a cover-up to prevent war with Cuba/Russia.
Martha Careful (1-Feb) : I have always admired the pluck of the man
Zero2Cool (1-Feb) : I remember thinking he was going to be something good.
Mucky Tundra (1-Feb) : The Dualing Banjo!
Zero2Cool (31-Jan) : Jets have named Chris Banjo as their special teams coordinator, Former Packers player
Zero2Cool (31-Jan) : Jaguars have hired Anthony Campanile as their DC. We lose coach
Zero2Cool (30-Jan) : QB coach Sean Mannion
Zero2Cool (30-Jan) : DL Coach DeMarcus Covington
dfosterf (30-Jan) : from ft Belvoir, Quantico and points south. Somber reminder of this tragedy at Reagan Nat Airport
dfosterf (30-Jan) : So eerily quiet here in Alexandria. I live in the flight path of commercial craft coming from the south and west, plus the military craft
dfosterf (30-Jan) : So eeri
Mucky Tundra (30-Jan) : Now that's a thought, maybe they're looking at the college ranks? Maybe not head coaches but DC/assistant DCs with league experience?
beast (30-Jan) : College Coaches wouldn't want that publicly, as it would hurt recruiting and they might not get the job.
beast (30-Jan) : I thought they were supposed to publicly announce them, at least the NFL ones. Hafley was from college, so I believe different rules.
Mucky Tundra (30-Jan) : Who knows who they're interviewing? I mean, nobody knew about Hafley and then out of nowhere he was hired
beast (30-Jan) : I wonder what's taking so long with hiring a DL coach, 2 of the 3 known to interview have already been hired elsewhere.
Zero2Cool (27-Jan) : Packers coach Matt LaFleur hires Luke Getsy as senior assistant, extends Rich Bisaccia's deal
Zero2Cool (27-Jan) : Chiefs again huh? I guess another Super Bowl I'll be finding something else to do.
Mucky Tundra (27-Jan) : Chiefs Eagles...again...sigh
dfosterf (27-Jan) : Happy Birthday Dave!
Mucky Tundra (27-Jan) : happy birthday dhazer
TheKanataThrilla (26-Jan) : Exactly buck...Washington came up with the ball. It is just a shitty coincidence one week later
buckeyepackfan (26-Jan) : I forgot, they corrected the call a week later. Lol btw HAPPY BIRTHDAY dhazer!
buckeyepackfan (26-Jan) : That brings up the question, why wasn't Nixon down by contact? I think that was the point Kanata was making.
buckeyepackfan (26-Jan) : Turnovers rule, win the turnover battle, win the game.
packerfanoutwest (26-Jan) : well, he was
TheKanataThrilla (26-Jan) : Eagles down by contact on the fumble....fuck you NFL
Mucky Tundra (26-Jan) : I think this games over
beast (26-Jan) : Eagles sure get a lot of fumbles on kickoffs
Mucky Tundra (26-Jan) : This game looks too big for Washington
packerfanoutwest (26-Jan) : that being said, The Ravens are the Browns
packerfanoutwest (26-Jan) : Browns, Dolphins have longest AFC Championship droughts
packerfanoutwest (26-Jan) : As of today, Cowboys have longest NFC Championship drought,
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

4-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / earthquake

4-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / earthquake

1-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

1-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

29-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

25-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.