CaliforniaCheez
14 years ago
In the nearly 90 years of packer football you would think that just about every jersey number has a history and that some great player had it in the past.

Yet some numbers never seem to do well or have much of a history.

If you are a rookie trying to make it, do you think it would be tough or unlucky to have such a number or would you want to create a history for it?

By the way did you know that only Curly Lambeau ever wore #1 for the Green and Gold? As owner and coach I guess he he could.

Look at some Packer numbers that aren't so famous or lucky:

#6 - No Packer player ever wore it more than one season. It went 78 years without being worn until a punter wore it in 2005 and another punter in 2008. Nobody chose it this season either.

#9 - Specialists Bidwell and Ryan had this number but few have had it long term. One of our tryout punters has it now.

#10 - If Matt Flynn wears it 4 years he will tie the record for having it the longest with Al Del Greco.

#11 - David Beverly and Eddie Garcia. BJ Sander last had it. Although Matt Hasselback had it bring him luck when he was traded in the Jamal Reynolds trajedy. Chasten West has now and he will get cut.

#16 - Good thing Bart Starr wore it only his rookie year. Scott Hunter, Randy Wright, and Craig Nall didn't help #16 become famous. Swain may want to switch numbers.

#18 - Tobin Rote is the most famous and Doug Peterson wore it the longest. Probably for a reason. Patrick Williams will not make it legendary.

#23 - I only remember Travis "Roadrunner" Williams wearing it. No Packer choose it this season either.

#27 - Was Blackmon on injured reserve last season because Buckley gave it bad luck?

#32 - Would Brandon Jackson have had a better career if he had a better number? #32 has not been kind.

#39 - Nobody has it now. How many remember back up Mike Pior on the Super Bowl teams of 96 and 97?

#47 - Good thing Bigby got rid of it. Good luck Frank Zombo.

#49 - Robert Francois has no old timers jealous of him having the number.

#69 - Hasn't helped anyone. Rookie Chris Campbell could use your prayers.

#70 - You would think a famous Packer had this some time. I have hope for Lang.


Note - Please do not say anything that might jinx our current Long Snapper. Also Brian Noble's old number has sure been bad luck since he wore it.

I have nothing against Lang and hope this does not jinx him (knock on wood).
blank
alharrisdude31
14 years ago
69 is very faithful, its always worked for me 😉
RajiRoar
14 years ago
well, part of it is that some numbers just look like crap on a jersey and starters will change to the better looking ones wile leaving the "uglies" to backups and rookies.

MintBaconDrivel
Dec, 11, 2012 - FOREVER!
Zero2Cool
14 years ago

well, part of it is that some numbers just look like crap on a jersey and starters will change to the better looking ones wile leaving the "uglies" to backups and rookies.

"RajiRoar" wrote:

Athletes are superstitious and like to continue using a number they used from High School and/or College or one that has some significance to it, for them.
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
14 years ago
It really doesn't matter. I bet you could find similar things on other teams too. It's pure coincidence.
UserPostedImage
TheEngineer
14 years ago
I thought Brohm last had number 11?
blank
zombieslayer
14 years ago
Awesome post. I thanked the topic not because I believe in luck, but because I love history.

On the flip side, a lot of numbers are lucky. Look at 80 for instance. Off the top of my head, I can think of perennial Pro Bowler James Lofton and 3 time Pro Bowler Donald Driver.

34 is a lucky number for a lot of football teams. I wouldn't be surprised if there are more 34s in the Hall of Fame than any other number.

Here's a question. Has anyone on the Packers ever worn 00? I knew there was a WR on the Oilers years ago who was 00 but I don't remember a Packer.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Cheesey
14 years ago
I think Jim Otto on the Raiders had 00 too. But i'm not sure about Packers.
UserPostedImage
CaliforniaCheez
14 years ago
Jim Otto thought it was a play on his name.
Remember players used to not have names on their jerseys.
Jim Otto owns a lot of Burger King franchises in the foothills of the Sierra Nevada out here.
Unfortunately, Jim Otto can barely walk now and uses 2 canes.
blank
CaliforniaCheez
14 years ago
I started this thread because every year some free agent rookie get a number that you instintively know means they will not make the team.

Most of the time with Packer players you remember someone else who had the number. Bulaga got a good number because the Packers expect him to be successful. Burnett was given Wynn's number immediately.

Guys like Robert Francois and Frank Zombo get the leftovers.
blank
Fan Shout
beast (4h) : If they aren't doing it, then why are you assuming they know how to do it?
dfosterf (9h) : Mackelvie
dfosterf (9h) : Michael Macelvie- NFL teams know how to draft- Why don"t they?
dfosterf (9h) : Youtube
Zero2Cool (14h) : Packers were not selected for the 2025 Hall of Fame game.
dfosterf (17h) : PFOW Out of our division would be a good thing imo
Zero2Cool (18h) : Jameson Williams is done at 24 years old? What? He's a WR, not QB. I'm missing something here haha
wpr (18h) : Tomorrow is almost here.
packerfanoutwest (19h) : would you want him if Pack needed a back up qb?
packerfanoutwest (19h) : JW is done......stick a fork in him
Zero2Cool (21h) : You should. He goes to AFC that helps Packers.
packerfanoutwest (23-Apr) : don't care
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Lions shopping Jameson Williams?
packerfanoutwest (22-Apr) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat
wpr (22-Apr) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.
wpr (22-Apr) : now 3
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Who? What?
beast (22-Apr) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
Martha Careful (21-Apr) : meh
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast
wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Packers Draft Threads / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.