Zero2Cool
14 years ago
Yes, I know he's no longer a Packer. And yes this is old news.

Packers' switch to 3-4 defense might not be sitting well with Kampman 

GREEN BAY, Wis. -- Normally one of the Green Bay Packers' most pleasant and accessible stars, Aaron Kampman suddenly has gone quiet.

That more than anything might indicate some level of discomfort with the team's decision to switch defensive schemes, a move that will turn one of the NFL's best pass-rushing defensive ends into an outside linebacker in the Packers' new base 3-4 alignment.

Kampman hasn't spoken to reporters about the change, but Packers coach Mike McCarthy seemed to acknowledge Thursday that his star player has some reservations.

"I think this defense is going to help Aaron Kampman," McCarthy said. "I think there is always a hesitancy when you are asked to do something different. Aaron was very comfortable in the old scheme, but I think this is going to create more opportunities for him."

After not speaking to reporters during the Packers' "fan fest" in March, Kampman was present for Thursday's voluntary organized team activity, but he didn't appear in the locker room while it was open to the media. A team spokesman said Kampman originally planned to address reporters Thursday, but he changed his mind despite being encouraged to speak by the Packers' public-relations staff.

Kampman's agent didn't immediately respond to a message from The Associated Press.

One of Kampman's closest friends on the team, quarterback Aaron Rodgers, said he hopes the pass-rush whiz will embrace the change.

"I hope he realizes that this is probably going to be the best thing for him," Rodgers said.

And Rodgers reiterated a point repeatedly brought up by McCarthy and new defensive coordinator Dom Capers: Kampman's position switch might not be as drastic as it seems, given the fact he generally will go back to being a traditional defensive end when the Packers deviate from their base defense with a "sub" package with extra defensive backs.

"He's not going to be standing up as much as maybe people think he is," Rodgers said. "So I think he's going to make the transition very smoothly, and we've got a lot of guys pushing him."

Still, Kampman will have to learn how to rush the passer from a standing position -- as opposed to the three-point stance at defensive end, with his hand on the ground. He'll sometimes drop into pass coverage, a staple of the 3-4 scheme intended to confuse offenses.

"I give him credit because that's a big transition, going from d-end all the time to standing up and having to think a lot more and do different things," Packers linebacker A.J. Hawk said. "He's really transitioned well."

Capers said rushing the passer from a standing position could make Kampman even more dangerous once he's comfortable with it. In certain situations, players in the defense can choose to line up in a three-point stance or stand up -- and Capers said they often choose to stand up.

"There's a lot more information you can process on the football field as a stand-up pass rusher as opposed to a pass rusher down in a three-point stance," said new outside linebackers coach Kevin Greene, who had 160 sacks during his NFL career. "I would know that, playing 15 years. He's going to have a lot more information to process to help him get off on the ball and blossom. We have all the plans in the world to improve his play, not to degrade his play at all, and he will be fine."

Capers downplayed talk of hesitancy on Kampman's part, describing the player as "very professional" and saying he's making good progress in his transition.

"He's obviously a very, very conscientious guy that's going to attempt to do things exactly the way you want them done," Capers said. "He's a smart player. You can see that right now in the transition."

But is Kampman enthusiastic about the switch or just being a good soldier doing what his coaches tell him to do?

"I don't get into that part of it, OK?" Capers said. "All I know is, everything we've asked him to do, he's done, and he's certainly not been resistant to anything we've asked him to do."

"May 2009" wrote:


UserPostedImage
Rockmolder
14 years ago
Witches are quite scary.
Zero2Cool
14 years ago
where do you get witches from? the title was sWitch ... i caps the wrong letter.
UserPostedImage
Rockmolder
14 years ago

where do you get witches from? the title was sWitch ... i caps the wrong letter.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



'Twas a reach.
Pack93z
14 years ago

"I hope he realizes that this is probably going to be the best thing for him," Rodgers said.



This.. in public to the press is, IMO, a misstep and out of line.. how the hell would Rodger now what is going to be the best for Kampman?



And Rodgers reiterated a point repeatedly brought up by McCarthy and new defensive coordinator Dom Capers: Kampman's position switch might not be as drastic as it seems, given the fact he generally will go back to being a traditional defensive end when the Packers deviate from their base defense with a "sub" package with extra defensive backs.

"He's not going to be standing up as much as maybe people think he is," Rodgers said. "So I think he's going to make the transition very smoothly, and we've got a lot of guys pushing him."



Fact turned out that Kampman rarely had his hand in the dirt.. and when he did he produced far greater than not.

IMO.. Rodgers took the company line of the coaches to the media and tried to push Kampman in the press.

Much like Favre did with Walker a few years back.. those things should be addressed away from the media.

Not that anything has ever be reported upon it.. but I wonder if Rodgers and Kampman's relationship changed in 2009... don't remember them hanging out much on the sidelines or at events.. curious is all.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Zero2Cool
14 years ago
What would Rodgers know? Gee, I don't know. He only scouts the tape of every team we play, and the schemes. I suppose, since he's a QB he has no knowledge of what a DE could do as a LB and is not entitled to an opinion.

BAH HUMBUGGERS!!
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
14 years ago

What would Rodgers know? Gee, I don't know. He only scouts the tape of every team we play, and the schemes. I suppose, since he's a QB he has no knowledge of what a DE could do as a LB and is not entitled to an opinion.

BAH HUMBUGGERS!!

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



Have an opinion.. not an issue.. laying it out there in the press to create a story or pressure a veteran that has played the game for years at a high level.

I just don't think you give that opinion in public... that is all..
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
TheEngineer
14 years ago
At first I thought you meant that the Jags also switched to a 3-4 defense.
blank
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
14 years ago

At first I thought you meant that the Jags also switched to a 3-4 defense.

"TheEngineer" wrote:



Me too.
UserPostedImage
loosenut
14 years ago

At first I thought you meant that the Jags also switched to a 3-4 defense.

"TheEngineer" wrote:



Aww man! How unlucky would that be for kampman???
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (8h) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (8h) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (8h) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (8h) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (8h) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (12h) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (12h) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (12h) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (15h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (15h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (15h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (15h) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (15h) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (15h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (15h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (15h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (16h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (16h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (16h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (16h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (17h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (17h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (17h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (17h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (17h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (18h) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (18h) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (18h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (18h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (18h) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (19h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (20h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (20h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (21h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (21h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (21h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (21h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (21h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (21h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (21h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (21h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (21h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (21h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (21h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (21h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (21h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (21h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (21h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (21h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (21h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.