IronMan
14 years ago

I know people like to crack against the defense, but I still don't think they cost us a game last year.

"nerdmann" wrote:

The Pittsburgh game and the playoff game.

"IronMan" wrote:




The OFFENSE turned the ball over twice in the first three plays in the playoffs. In the Red Zone. Against the best Red Zone team in the league.
The OFFENSE also lost the game in overtime.
Not saying the defense couldn't be better. I just don't pin any of this season's losses on the defense. Unlike the previous season.

"nerdmann" wrote:


The offense also scored 36, and 45 points in those games. You're kidding right?
Zero2Cool
14 years ago
When your offense scores more than 20, you should win. If you don't, it's because of poor defense more times than not. In our case the Special Teams also contributed to our futility.

The early turnovers in the playoff game hurt us, they did not bury us. Our offense is what kept us IN the game and got us to overtime.
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
14 years ago
Rankings or Power Polls or what ever the given author wants to title his ramblings.. they are all completely and utterly useless as any real point of reference.

All they accomplish is drive talk around the the given writer... don't mean to sound crass on a Tuesday morning.. but it is all bullshit. Apparently King needs his column talked about this week and wants a mailbox full of e-mails to drive his Tuesday edition.

Normally King strives for better than a springtime ranking of the NFL.. disappointed. BTW.. Williams is our second or at worst third CB on the roster.... and King you wonder why I give your rankings the heave.

I like his 10 things better than this type of garbage..
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
musccy
  • musccy
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
14 years ago

good points zero... the pack haven't really proven much the last 2 years, additionally, Grant and the cbs make me nervous. However, there is no denying this team has a ton of potential, so hopefully they live up to that!

"dhazer" wrote:



I hate the word potential after all what is it? To me its just someones opinion on how good a person should be. Potential = opinion so we have alot of opinions lol

"musccy" wrote:



One of my favorite lines from my college coach: "Potential means you haven't done it yet."
musccy
  • musccy
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
14 years ago

When your offense scores more than 20, you should win. If you don't, it's because of poor defense more times than not. In our case the Special Teams also contributed to our futility.

The early turnovers in the playoff game hurt us, they did not bury us. Our offense is what kept us IN the game and got us to overtime.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



I agree with you and ironman, if you put up 45, you should expect to win. The defense made some great strides last year, but were exposed and disected by top level quarterbacks towards the end of last year. That's not something to dismiss under the rug.
Stevetarded
14 years ago

I know people like to crack against the defense, but I still don't think they cost us a game last year.

"nerdmann" wrote:

The Pittsburgh game and the playoff game.

"IronMan" wrote:




The OFFENSE turned the ball over twice in the first three plays in the playoffs. In the Red Zone. Against the best Red Zone team in the league.
The OFFENSE also lost the game in overtime.
Not saying the defense couldn't be better. I just don't pin any of this season's losses on the defense. Unlike the previous season.

"nerdmann" wrote:



Vs Pittsburgh the defense gave up 537 yards, 23 first downs, and a game winning drive while time expired, the offense scored 36 points and there were no turnovers. It doesn't get any more on the defense than that.
blank
Pack93z
14 years ago
The Pittsburgh and Cardinal game exposed a weakness that the Packers have.. which simply is we can't play zone defense effectively enough to save our asses.

Which forced us to stay with our physical brand of coverage with a couple of greenhorns at CB... now throw in some piss poor communication on the field from the QB of the defense at safety and the lack of someone grabbing hold to the leadership reins in the crunch.

Watch the stacks and motion Pittsburgh and Arizona threw at us.. they had short routes all over the place wide open.. which made Capers drop some of his blitz packages in favor of trying to shore up the quick hitting routes..

All this did was minimize the weak ass pressure we already got from ineffective interior blitzing and made our pass rush very predictable and thus ineffective.. which in turn allowed the opposition to sit on the deeper routes and torched another weakness in half of our safety coverage..

Part of that whole breakdown was some effective game planning from the opposition.. but much of it started to snowball with the fact that Capers, IMO, didn't trust our zone coverage at all (don't blame him) and kind of knotted up the variation that Capers could adjust to..

How to improve that:

> Become more effective in Zone Coverage.

> Get more effective blitzing from the interior backers to open up the packages in the pressure aspect.. the only effective blitz from the interior backers was the cross stunt when he sent both of them crashing.. other than that.. they got zero effectiveness when he sent them.

In the 3-4 you have to be able to get pressure from all 4 linebackers for the scheme really to take off.. we didn't get that.

> We need better communication from safeties (the QB of the Defense) prior to the offensive snap.. read it properly and make adjustments accordingly.. then communicate them effectively.. not the monkey humping the football routine that we seen late last season.. embarrassing to watch that level of confusion.. backups or not. Collins and Bigby were there.. it should be cleaner than that.

> We need the down three to provide some pass rushing push.. I understand that Capers had them sitting run first than pass rush to protect our interior backers (can't get off a run block) but our down three have to been able to get a push to at the very least reduce the depth of the pocket.

> Be a bit luckier in the injury department so we can minimize the drop in the level of play in our depth and reduce the responsibility load upon Collins, who has proven that he is a hell of a safety in play but inside overly effective in making defensive adjustments upon the field.. or Bigby whom over the course of the last two seasons has difficulty just staying on the field. Hell he gave up in the Cardinals game.

> Matthews needs to evolve his game to the next level where he can dial up different combination to rush the passer.. the guy goes all out every play.. he just needs to add to his arsenal of pass rushing techniques than beating them around the corner. KGB lived on the speed rush alone for a couple of years.. if Clay wants to better that.. he needs to become a more complete pass rusher.

> We need Jones/Obi/Poppinga/UDFA bloomer to become a more consistently effective pass rusher from that side.. personally I hold little hope for Poppinga.. but I have great hope and excitement for the other two.

> And lastly.. Dom has to trust his zone calls earlier in this year, year two of deployment of his defense so that we can dial up those calls when the opposing offenses game plan effectively for our pressure bump style of play with space and motion. I understand that zone isn't our strong suit, our guys are physical bump type players.. but we have to be able to at least be effective in zone when we have no choice but to drop into them.

There.. Pack93's thoughts upon the 2010 defensive remedies.. peck away. 😉
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
zombieslayer
14 years ago

When your offense scores more than 20, you should win.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



I had to look up recent SB history, just out of curiosity.

From 1998 to 2009, SB winner could have won the game by scoring 20 points 8 times. You have to go all the way back to 1978 (before kids like you were even born) to find a team who lost the SB who scored 30 points.

It's pretty safe to say that if your O scored 24 points, you should win the game. If you lose, the D is to blame.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Formo
14 years ago

I don't like these rankings. It's nice that he's trying to do something different, but I just can't see it playing out like this at this point.

Minnesota at 13 is crazy. Even without Favre I think that they're better than that. They could get to the play-offs on their running game and defense, alone. Although he does make a good point about the O-line.

Seattle at 11? Even if this is a play-off simulation, rather than a power ranking, I'd go with the 49ers.

What have the Giants done to improve, all of a sudden? I'd take both Dallas and Philly over them right now.

Carolina at 8 seems like a stretch with that awful D-line. Without Peppers, their defense gets even more mediocre than it already was. I bet you can't name one playmaker on that defense.

Miami at 6 is a stretch. Henne hasn't done enough to show that he'll, somehow, become an elite QB all of a sudden. Both of their starting DE/OLBs from last year are gone and Koa Misi isn't going to be a force (in his first year).

And lastly, Green Bay at 1 is pretty crazy right now. The article itsself says it already, we don't have anyone opposite of Matthews, who's a little overrated, anyway. I hope that Brad Jones has bulked up and will show something, but I doubt that very much. The O-line still isn't great. Clifton will be on the ground at some points during the season and Bulaga will have to step in, who's a big unknown and is, I think, still more of a RT, anyway.

We'll see how it plays out, though. There's a few surprises every year and he's bound to have some right.

"Rockmolder" wrote:



Good post. I'd have GB up there. Get that weird defense shored up and you guys are easily a scary team.

Minnesota's Oline was mediocre at best last season. But, in their defense, there was 2 new starters that year, too. Sullivan and Loadholt. Of all the individual groups on a football team, none is more effected by chemistry than the lines.. Especially offensive lines. I'm not saying Minny's oline is going to be better this year, but I think it's fair to expect it to be better. Bottom line (see what I did thar?), if that group of linemen get their issues shored up, Minnesota's running game could be vastly improved, even without Chester Taylor and with a rookie 3rd down back.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Pack93z
14 years ago
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/writers/peter_king/05/18/mailbag/index.html 
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Fan Shout
buckeyepackfan (33m) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
Mucky Tundra (9h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
beast (9h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
bboystyle (10h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
Mucky Tundra (13h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
Mucky Tundra (13h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
Mucky Tundra (13h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
buckeyepackfan (13h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks
Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak
beast (21-Dec) : So far the college playoffs have sucked... One team absolutely dominates the other
beast (21-Dec) : Well even if you weren't positive towards a guy, you wouldn't nessarily want to tell the media that (if they don't know about it)
Martha Careful (21-Dec) : I think MLF want Love to look past the end half issues, and feel good about his play. Our coaches generally keep a very positive tone.
beast (21-Dec) : I think a great running game will do that for most QBs
packerfanoutwest (21-Dec) : Coach Matt LaFleur has said quarterback Jordan Love is playing the best football of his career.
beast (21-Dec) : Oh, that's how you keep beating buckeye, with cheating
Zero2Cool (20-Dec) : There is a rule that if your name starts with 'b' you lose 15 points. Hey, I don't make the rules, I just enforce them!
wpr (20-Dec) : and then there is Beast. Running away with it all.
beast (20-Dec) : As of tonight, 3 way tie for 2nd in Pick'em, that battle is interesting!
beast (20-Dec) : Lions vs Vikings could be the main last game as it could determine division winners or #1 vs #2 seed
Mucky Tundra (20-Dec) : Or if KC needs to win for the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (20-Dec) : Right now it looks like the only prime worthy games are Det-Minny and KC-Denver (if Denver can clinch a wild card spot)
Mucky Tundra (20-Dec) : The entirety of week 18 being listed as flex is weird
Zero2Cool (19-Dec) : Matt LaFleur today says unequivocally "Ted Thompson had nothing to do with the drafting of Jordan Love."
Zero2Cool (19-Dec) : Apparently, the editing is what pieces comments together. That Ted thing ... fake news.
Zero2Cool (19-Dec) : LaFleur "opportunity that Ted Thompson thought was too good to pass up"
Zero2Cool (19-Dec) : Jordan Love pick was Ted Thompson's idea.
Mucky Tundra (19-Dec) : Kyle Shanahan on signing De'Vondre Campbell as a FA last offseason: “We obviously made a mistake.”
packerfanoutwest (19-Dec) : Alexander’s last season with GB
Martha Careful (18-Dec) : if I were a professional athlete, I would probably look to see who the agent is for Kirk Cousins and then use him
beast (18-Dec) : $100 million fully guaranteed Kirk Cousins gets benched for rookie
Mucky Tundra (18-Dec) : a lower case b
Mucky Tundra (18-Dec) : The real lie is how beast capitalized his name in his message while it's normally spelled with
packerfanoutwest (18-Dec) : haha that's a lie
beast (17-Dec) : Despite what lies other might tell, Beast didn't hate the Winter Warnings, it felt refreshing to Beast for some reason.
Zero2Cool (17-Dec) : whiteout uniforms in general are pretty lame and weak. NFL greed at it's worst
Martha Careful (17-Dec) : The Viking uniforms, the whiteout uniforms specifically absolutely suck
beast (17-Dec) : Thanks Zero2Cool, looks a lot better now
beast (17-Dec) : Seems like someone has a crush on me, can't stop talking about me
Zero2Cool (17-Dec) : Should be gooder now. The forum default theme went to goofy land.
Zero2Cool (17-Dec) : What the hell
packerfanoutwest (17-Dec) : yeah beast hates the Winter Warning Unies
Mucky Tundra (16-Dec) : Okay I'm glad to know it's not just something happening to me lol
Mucky Tundra (16-Dec) : Zero, did you copy the Packers uniforms from last night and white out the board?
beast (16-Dec) : Oh crap, is the board going to the Winter Warning Uniforms too?!? It's all white on white right now!
Zero2Cool (16-Dec) : WR Odell Beckham Jr is officially a free agent after clearing waivers.
Zero2Cool (16-Dec) : Packers are 6th in sacks.
Zero2Cool (16-Dec) : RB David Montgomery will undergo season-ending knee surgery.
Mucky Tundra (16-Dec) : Dan Campbell on onside kick with 12 minutes left: In hindsight, wish I didn’t do that
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.