Rock.. explain why you see that as a horrible trade. I happen to agree.. but want to hear your take.

---

Because we're not getting rid of 2 OL for a QB we don't need and a draft pick.

We need Spitz. Colledge I wouldn't shed a tear for if we lost him, but Spitz, we need. The interior of our OL isn't that bad and I'm sure we're keeping Wells, Spitz, and Sitton at the very least.

I don't buy this.

---

Spitz is a good guard. He should be a starter this year. Colledge is a high end back-up, the way it looks now.

You trade both of them away and we're paper thin at OG. I asume that our starting line-up would be Clifton - Lang - Wells - Sitton - Tauscher. That'd leave us with Dietrich-Smith and Breno Giacomini as back ups.

So we'll weaken our starting line-up by trading away Spitz. We trade away Colledge who would be our nr. 2 on the depth chart on nearly every interior line position (Spitz would slide to C, Colledge at G if Wells goes down). We have to plug in Lang at G, which means that we still don't have a RT of the future on the roster.

And for what? A back-up QB and a 5th round pick. If we weaken this O-line, we'll need 5 back-up QBs. And you don't have a very high hit change in the 5th. Even in as deep as a draft as this one.

pack, your vendor held the annual company fest with tons of free beer today, correct? 😉

---

Really would not be that bad. We get rid of College and pick up a solid backup QB for Mike McCarthy to groom. Also the 5th round pick would be a high one and with the draft being as solid as it is it would not be too bad. Saying that I think the Skins would get the better of the deal.

---

How about Colledge for that 5th?

---

how about Colledge for a case of Miller Lite?

---

I think a set of golf clubs would be more useful.

---

I rather keep both the GUARDS than to get Jason Campbell, we know that our OL get injured a lot.

---

Empties, even. (We have a nickel deposit here in Iowa)

---