British
15 years ago
In his latest chat Green Bay Press Gazette reporter Rob Demovsky said the Packers usually keep 9 defensive backs on the 53 man roster.

Considering we're expected to draft at least one corner and one safety, which four players do you think are going to miss out?

This is what we have at present:

1. Woodson
2. Harris
2. T-Will
4. Pat Lee
5. Blackmon
6. Underwood
7. Josh Bell
8. Jarrett Bush

9. Collins
10.Bigby
11.Derrick Martin

12. Rookie CB
13. Rookie S
UserPostedImage
Rockmolder
15 years ago
1. Woodson
2. Harris
3. Williams
4. Underwood
5. Blackmon
6. Bush
7. Collins
8. Bigby
9. Martin
10. Rookie S

This is a pretty hard one. I think that we'll be keeping Blackmon, Bush and Martin mainly for STs. If you look at it like that, you can open up an extra spot, as we'll only have 3 pure safeties and 4 real CBs. That's why I put down 10 instead of 9.

One 'shocking' move has to be made, I think. In my scenario, it'd be giving up on Lee after he's played just 5 games.

If we draft a rookie CB, it might be the end of Bush or Blackmon.
HoustonMatt
15 years ago


1. Woodson
2. Harris
3. Williams
4. Underwood
5. Blackmon
6. Bush
7. Collins
8. Bigby
9. Martin
10. Rookie S

"Rockmolder" wrote:



This looks about right to me, but it's one over the normal 9 DBs quoted in the article. Now, the team certainly could keep 10, but if the exercise is to choose 9, I'd drop Harris off the list largely because of Coach's words about him in his press conference. He stated that he views Al's recovery time very similar to Tauscher's last year, so I wouldn't be surprised to see a similar move (ie. Al comes in after week 5 or so). By that point you'd think there would have been an injury or two that would take care of the additional roster spot on its own.

Look, I know we all love Al, but at some point you have to remove the name and emotion and base this decision on a 35 year old CB coming off of major knee surgery who is under contract for $2.5 million next year. And given that it's not certain he'll be ready for Week 1, management certainly can't be blamed for taking a wait and see approach as they did with Tausch.

Frankly, it would be risky to count on him - even as a nickle back. My guess is that management plans on playing next year without him and sees anything beyond that as an added bonus.
blank
zombieslayer
15 years ago
OK, I don't know how this works so someone will have to enlighten me here, but I'm hearing that Harris probably won't be ready by game 1. If not, is he not on the opening roster? You can't have someone on IR then activate him later on in the season, can you?

So, if Harris isn't ready by game 1, do we start the season with 52 players or do we cut someone when Harris comes back? If the latter, then the 9 DBs who start the season won't be the same 9 when Harris comes back, assuming that spot is filled by a DB.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Nonstopdrivel
15 years ago
The Packers could place him on the Physically Unable to Perform list (provided he was placed there before training camp, I believe), which would keep a roster spot free. He would then be required to sit out the first six games. During this time, he would be forbidden to practice with the team, but could continue his rehabilitation, etc. After six games, the Packers would have three weeks in which to bring him back into practice. After he started practicing, the Packers would have three weeks in which to sign him to the active roster. If he failed to begin practicing within the three-week window or the team failed to sign him within three weeks after he began practicing, he would remain on the PUP list the remainder of the season.
UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
15 years ago
Thanks Non.

From what I've heard, there's a pretty good chance that that will be the route we may have to go with Al. I hope not. I hope he's 100% by game 1. But I wouldn't count on it.

Harris is a workaholic though. If anyone can beat a major injury's timetable, he's as strong a candidate as anyone.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Pack93z
15 years ago
What I hope to see... it is time for Lee and Blackmon to either step up or out... not available.. find the door and get healthy.

1. Woodson
2. Harris - PUP
2. T-Will
4. Pat Lee Healthy and make an impact, if not bounced for Bell or a talented rookie.

5. Blackmon - Almost same boat as Lee.. except with his return ability it gets a slight advantage..

6. Underwood - Mark it down.. this kid, raw as he is right now.. with develop into a hell of a corner for us.. need to add some meat and strength without losing those quick feet. He is a lock on the roster this season.. I will eat with post without salt or pepper if he doesn't prosper.

[strike]7. Josh Bell
8. Jarrett Bush[/strike]

9. Collins
9a - Rookie S
10.Bigby
11.Derrick Martin

12. Rookie CB Practice Squad
13. Rookie S - Practice Squad
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
buckeyepackfan
15 years ago

What I hope to see... it is time for Lee and Blackmon to either step up or out... not available.. find the door and get healthy.

1. Woodson
2. Harris - PUP
2. T-Will
4. Pat Lee Healthy and make an impact, if not bounced for Bell or a talented rookie.

5. Blackmon - Almost same boat as Lee.. except with his return ability it gets a slight advantage..

6. Underwood - Mark it down.. this kid, raw as he is right now.. with develop into a hell of a corner for us.. need to add some meat and strength without losing those quick feet. He is a lock on the roster this season.. I will eat with post without salt or pepper if he doesn't prosper.

[strike]7. Josh Bell
8. Jarrett Bush[/strike]

9. Collins
9a - Rookie S
10.Bigby
11.Derrick Martin

12. Rookie CB Practice Squad
13. Rookie S - Practice Squad

"pack93z" wrote:



You about have it right 93, except Jarret Bush isn't going anywhere. He is just to valuable on ST's, if not that, I've been saying it for 2 years now, he has to have naked pictures of Ted Thompson stashed somewhere. LOL

IMHO The Packers are going to bring BACK as many as these guys as possible and hope they don't get injured. There is a lot of talent there, they just can't seem to stay on the field.

Someone will get an early injury, which will make room for any new draft pick to make the team.

Will be interesting to see when and how many db's Ted Thompson drafts, if he waits till the later rounds, those guys will most likely end up on the PS, if Ted Thompson drafts a safety in the first 3 rounds, someones job is in jeapardy. BUT IT WON'T BE JARRET BUSH!!!! :icon_smile:
I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
tromadz
15 years ago
Don't count out Bell! Yeah he gave up that one heart crushing soul destroying season ending TD, but hey...
15 years ago
Good discussion so far. Cheers.

For those out there who think Bush will be gone, let me just remind you who the guy in my avatar is-

Jarrett Bush is a 6'0" 200 lb. 25 year old safety/cornerback/special teamer with 62 games of NFL experience, all in a Packer uniform.

His size is near prototypical, being almost identical to Charles Woodson in height and weight. He's still very young, despite having 4 years of experience, and durable, playing in all but two games over that time. He was playing in the NFL two years before Pat Lee, despite being 3 months younger than Lee. By all accounts he is a hard worker and a good person, with no off the field incidents and an Olympic track star girlfriend. He plays not one, not two, but THREE positions where the Packers are relatively weak, and he's at an age where many players are just coming into their prime. He's not going anywhere.
Fan Shout
wpr (9h) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately
Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.
dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.
Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Guessing they probably knew. Did he have cast or something on?
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : Did they know that at the time or was that something the realized afterwards?
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Van Ness played most of season with broken thumb
wpr (9-Apr) : yay
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Mark Murphy says Steelers likely to protect Packers game. Meaning, no Ireland
Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Struggling to figure out what text editor options are needed and which are 'nice to have'
Mucky Tundra (8-Apr) : *CHOMP CHOMP CHOMP*
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : WR who said he'd break Xavier Worthy 40 time...and ran slower than you
Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Who?
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Texas’ WR Isaiah Bond is scheduled to visit the Bills, Browns, Chiefs, Falcons, Packers and Titans starting next week.
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Spotting ball isn't changing, only measuring distance is, Which wasn't the issue.
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : The spotting of the ball IS the issue. Not the chain gang.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
2h / Random Babble / wpr

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

15-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

29-Mar / Random Babble / wpr

28-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

26-Mar / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.