Zero2Cool
16 years ago

Aaron Rodgers WILL play against the Falcons and he WILL throw for TWO TD's and we WILL win the game. Mark my words. Bookmark this thread and come back to it in four days. :)

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



Yeah, looking pretty stupid now... oh well.
UserPostedImage
greenwhiteandnogold
16 years ago

For the love of god!!

The Packers did not PICK Rodgers over Favre. Favre was pressured INTO a decision TOO SOON a decision the Packers say they felt was RETURN TO THE PACKERS. He instead retired. It caught them OFF GUARD, so they say.

You can not say for four months that Rodgers is our guy then Brett comes back throwing people under the bus and give him the job. Don't people THINK before they talk about this?

FOOTBALL IS A BUSINESS! It's a bitch. I hate seeing MY QB in a ugly ass JETS uniform, but I will be damned if I am going to be naive an ignorant enough to bash the Packers for doing what they feel is BEST for the Packers since their QB RETIRED when they felt he would RETURN.



/me okay ... my rant/ temper tantrum/ soap box/ bitch fest is over :)

"Zero2Cool" wrote:




That's your perspective, not everyone agrees.

1. I agree that MGMT pressured Favre into a decision in March. Whether their motivation was to get him to retire or come back is a matter of opinion. There's no proof that they pressured him in the hopes that pressuring would get him to come back. My opinion is that it would do the opposite and they knew it. IMO no player, especially coming off a devastating loss, feels like playing in March.

2. I would agree that Favre shouldn't have gotten on Gretta. That was is most classless act I've seen in 16 years. I wouldn't say that he "threw people under the bus". Was it a TO moment? Yes! Did it achieve anything? No. IMO, Favre was pissed off (it was obvious) and felt disrespected because of how Ted Thompson and Mike McCarthy were treating him and how they were spinning it to the media. Ted Thompson insisted that "Favre would not come back as a starter", he's welcome back "but he'll be a backup". And oh by the way "we will not grant his request to be released". Then, when Favre calls the bluff, they tell the world that their will be an open QB competition (total spin), because the truth was they never intended to give Favre a chance to compete. Heck, they had the security guard tell him he couldn't go into the locker room before family night. The problem with the whole thing is how MGMT handled it. They treated him like an outsider, showed him no respect, and even tried to buy him off (pay to not play).

3. The Packers are/were a team owned by the Fans, or so we thought. Teddy Tossers blindly follow their leader - If Ted Thompson thinks it's the best thing for the team, THEN IT MUST BE SO. Sorry, I'm not buying in on that crap. Correlate bashing Ted Thompson and not supporting the GM no questions asked with bashing the Packers is ridiculous.
blank
longtimefan
16 years ago
not allowed in locker room

yes rotten, disresepctful hell yeah, classless yup, mean ypu


but he was NOT on the active roster was not really a member of the team so his code was taken away just like EVERY player that is not on the packers roster..

Could they have allowed him in, yes and probably should have..But they were/are on a mission that EVERY player no matter who you are will be treated EXACTLY the same
porky88
16 years ago

2. I would agree that Favre shouldn't have gotten on Gretta. That was is most classless act I've seen in 16 years. I wouldn't say that he "threw people under the bus". Was it a TO moment? Yes! Did it achieve anything? No. IMO, Favre was pissed off (it was obvious) and felt disrespected because of how Ted Thompson and Mike McCarthy were treating him and how they were spinning it to the media. Ted Thompson insisted that "Favre would not come back as a starter", he's welcome back "but he'll be a backup". And oh by the way "we will not grant his request to be released". Then, when Favre calls the bluff, they tell the world that their will be an open QB competition (total spin), because the truth was they never intended to give Favre a chance to compete. Heck, they had the security guard tell him he couldn't go into the locker room before family night. The problem with the whole thing is how MGMT handled it. They treated him like an outsider, showed him no respect, and even tried to buy him off (pay to not play).



Favre actually went on Gretta before the whole Family Night debacle. Favre went on Gretta because he felt the Packers were saying hurtful things in interviews. Actually I think lies is what's been told. Thompson and McCarthy did interviews to get their story out first. His wife actually setup the interview.

My guess is Favre also didn't like Ted from the start. I think enough was enough with him and he went on there to basically let the what he felt the truth be heard. Whether or not it is or was is something I don't know and none of us do.

I didn't like the move by Favre and I kind of feel that McCarthy and Thompson couldn't put aside their differences with Favre after that interview. My opinion would have been to get over it but it is what it is.

I agree that Favre was completely mistreated at Family Night and he really should have been allowed to enter the facilities. I think he was mislead and that was very wrong.

3. The Packers are/were a team owned by the Fans, or so we thought. Teddy Tossers blindly follow their leader - If Ted Thompson thinks it's the best thing for the team, THEN IT MUST BE SO. Sorry, I'm not buying in on that crap. Correlate bashing Ted Thompson and not supporting the GM no questions asked with bashing the Packers is ridiculous.



What are you going to do? You don't have to buy into the crap and I don't really like it either, but it's over with. It's in the past and there is nothing that can be done any more. I think that's the point a lot of us are trying to make.
greenwhiteandnogold
16 years ago

not allowed in locker room

yes rotten, disresepctful hell yeah, classless yup, mean ypu


but he was NOT on the active roster was not really a member of the team so his code was taken away just like EVERY player that is not on the packers roster..

Could they have allowed him in, yes and probably should have..But they were/are on a mission that EVERY player no matter who you are will be treated EXACTLY the same

"longtimefan" wrote:



That's all fine and dandy and makes for a great MISSION, but not all players are treated the same in the NFL as we know it... and I think that had little to do with Ted Thompson and MMs true agenda. How do you know that their on a mission to treat every player the same? Where do you get that?

I'm sorry, but for the past 12-16 years Brett DID RECEIVE special treatment compared to other packer players, and I didn't/don't have a problem with giving special treatment to stars that earn it. I'm sorry but I don't think it's right to cut a 10-16 year player the same way you would some rookie who was with the team for a year or two.

Oh and btw, Favre was reinstated and technically on the active roster for family night. As soon as he was reinstated he was a Packer again by default. Regardless, that's a pretty lame excuse. This is Brett Favre we're talking about.
blank
4PackGirl
16 years ago
hmmm...coulda SWORE this thread was about AARON FRIGGIN RODGERS! :xcensoredx: :xcensoredx: :xcensoredx:
dfosterf
14 years ago

You'd have given up our 2nd round draft pick for Garcia? Please, don't ever replace the Packers GM with yourself. That is down right silly talk that says "Hey im stoned off my boobies!" right thar!

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



No it isn't. (He was referring to Brohm)

:thumbleft:

he he he

(Fun thread to re-read, Dhazer is truly full of shit, as was greatly suspected, lol)

j/k Dave
Rockmolder
14 years ago
I still think that we should've signed Mark Brunell.

Just sayin'.
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (8h) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (8h) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (8h) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (8h) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (8h) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (12h) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (12h) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (12h) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (15h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (15h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (15h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (15h) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (15h) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (15h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (15h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (15h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (16h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (16h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (16h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (17h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (17h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (17h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (17h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (17h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (18h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (18h) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (18h) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (18h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (18h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (18h) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (19h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (20h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (20h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (21h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (21h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (21h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (21h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (21h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (21h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (21h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (21h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (21h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (21h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (21h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (21h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (21h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (21h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (21h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (21h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (22h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.