Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
2 Pages12>
Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline Pack93z  
#1 Posted : Wednesday, September 29, 2010 3:24:24 PM(UTC)
Pack93z

Rank: Hall of Famer

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Bronze: 2012

United States
Posts: 12,752
Joined: 3/16/2007(UTC)
Location: North Central Wisconsin

Applause Given: 381
Applause Received: 1,022

Sad to say, we need to have a common method for handling this issue in both leagues for consistency sake.

We have one player already inactive for 19 days and this weekend that team has inactive players.. so for fairness sake, we need to have a method for dealing with this situation out front.

My recommendation is this, freeze the roster at this point and have the league commissioner set the starting lineup for said team. No player transactions can be made from this team until the owner returns or a new player can be found to replace it.

Publish in the comment section that the roster lineup has been set by the commissioner for transparency sake.. if there is any disagreement with the lineups, they can be suggested before the weeks schedule has started.

The point here is to try and avoid basic forfeit weeks to any teams.

Thoughts?
I think when there's enough will and aggression, there's no shortage of talent either.

UserPostedImage
Sponsor
Offline dfosterf  
#2 Posted : Wednesday, September 29, 2010 3:54:05 PM(UTC)
dfosterf

Rank: All Pro

United States
Posts: 5,879
Joined: 8/19/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 169
Applause Received: 366

It's you and Kev--yes?

Commish-wise?

I'm all for that.
UserPostedImage
damn skippy I'm an owner. I currently own a full .00001924537805515393 % of the Green Bay Packers.



Offline Packers_Finland  
#3 Posted : Wednesday, September 29, 2010 3:55:24 PM(UTC)
Packers_Finland

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

Posts: 2,623
Joined: 8/11/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 88
Applause Received: 44

Yeah, as long as you don't replace their guys from the waiver wire, I'm fine with this
This is a placeholder
Offline Pack93z  
#4 Posted : Wednesday, September 29, 2010 4:32:59 PM(UTC)
Pack93z

Rank: Hall of Famer

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Bronze: 2012

United States
Posts: 12,752
Joined: 3/16/2007(UTC)
Location: North Central Wisconsin

Applause Given: 381
Applause Received: 1,022

The only objective that should be established here.. is to provide some sense of competitive balance amongst the league.. no gimme weeks.
I think when there's enough will and aggression, there's no shortage of talent either.

UserPostedImage
Offline Packers_Finland  
#5 Posted : Wednesday, September 29, 2010 4:40:03 PM(UTC)
Packers_Finland

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

Posts: 2,623
Joined: 8/11/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 88
Applause Received: 44

Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post
The only objective that should be established here.. is to provide some sense of competitive balance amongst the league.. no gimme weeks.


Stop talking about "competitive balance" when Dodd has had teams score 261 points on him in 3 weeks while I have had 410 points scored against me in the same time. That's 50 more points a week.

Just kidding though, I agree.
This is a placeholder
Offline Pack93z  
#6 Posted : Wednesday, September 29, 2010 7:51:28 PM(UTC)
Pack93z

Rank: Hall of Famer

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Bronze: 2012

United States
Posts: 12,752
Joined: 3/16/2007(UTC)
Location: North Central Wisconsin

Applause Given: 381
Applause Received: 1,022

Don't have to tell me about it.. I got 217 points hung on me in another league.. I scored the 4th highest in the week and got waxed by 50+... lol.

I am sucking doughnuts so far this season in the win column.. and Foster is getting thirsty. ;)
I think when there's enough will and aggression, there's no shortage of talent either.

UserPostedImage
Offline doddpower  
#7 Posted : Friday, October 1, 2010 1:15:45 PM(UTC)
DoddPower

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2011

United States
Posts: 2,715
Joined: 9/24/2007(UTC)
Location: Visalia, CA

Applause Given: 1,774
Applause Received: 418

Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post
The only objective that should be established here.. is to provide some sense of competitive balance amongst the league.. no gimme weeks.


Stop talking about "competitive balance" when Dodd has had teams score 261 points on him in 3 weeks while I have had 410 points scored against me in the same time. That's 50 more points a week.

Just kidding though, I agree.


Hey man, that's fantasy football. It's not about how many points one scores or are scored against him, only that he scores more than his opponent that week.

In my main league, a pay league with a $55 buy in, I am doing TERRIBLE! Haven't even come close to winning a game yet and it's the league with all family and close friends. I was so stoked about my draft and thought I was going to dominate. A Ryan Grant injury, Ryan Mathews bust so far, Favre sucking, Colston disappointing and I have a recipe for sucking. At this point, I'll be lucky to win a single game.

=(
Offline Zero2Cool  
#8 Posted : Friday, October 1, 2010 2:28:40 PM(UTC)
Zero2Cool

Rank: Legend

Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

United States
Posts: 25,674
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI

Applause Given: 1,846
Applause Received: 2,004

Inactivity is a downer. We'll have to keep note of those who are active and invite them back next year and make note of those who are not and block them next year.

I am extremely strongly adamant against changing anything with the leagues, which is why I posted information far ahead of time, to avoid changes after the season started.


I am also strongly adamantly extremely pissed at those who are inactive, but not to the point where I'll change rules after I said specifically, no changes after a said date.


Sorry for upsetting anyone with this news. But changing things mid season is what got me pissed off in the other league last year. I'd be rightly viewed a hypocrite if I were to change rules in a PH league.

UserPostedImage
Click here and find the LATEST Packers News!
Offline Zero2Cool  
#9 Posted : Friday, October 1, 2010 2:32:28 PM(UTC)
Zero2Cool

Rank: Legend

Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

United States
Posts: 25,674
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI

Applause Given: 1,846
Applause Received: 2,004

Wow, Nonstopdrivel and The_Green_Ninja are inactive for 24 days and two months respectively.

The_Green_Ninja wanted to MANAGE one of the leagues! I made the right choice there.


Nonstopdrivel, I just don't understand. I know he's alive and poking the ladies about.

UserPostedImage
Click here and find the LATEST Packers News!
Offline Pack93z  
#10 Posted : Friday, October 1, 2010 2:42:53 PM(UTC)
Pack93z

Rank: Hall of Famer

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Bronze: 2012

United States
Posts: 12,752
Joined: 3/16/2007(UTC)
Location: North Central Wisconsin

Applause Given: 381
Applause Received: 1,022

Okay.. so we are going to allow freebie weeks against teams with inactive players?

I understand and respect the no changes concept.. but I think not dealing with the issue creates more of an issue than staying with the hard line.. either way though..
I think when there's enough will and aggression, there's no shortage of talent either.

UserPostedImage
Offline Packers_Finland  
#11 Posted : Friday, October 1, 2010 3:06:57 PM(UTC)
Packers_Finland

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

Posts: 2,623
Joined: 8/11/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 88
Applause Received: 44

Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post
Okay.. so we are going to allow freebie weeks against teams with inactive players?

I understand and respect the no changes concept.. but I think not dealing with the issue creates more of an issue than staying with the hard line.. either way though..


Shut up already... I'm playing a guy who's starting Peterson (bye week) and Moreno (injured)
This is a placeholder
Offline doddpower  
#12 Posted : Friday, October 1, 2010 3:11:06 PM(UTC)
DoddPower

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2011

United States
Posts: 2,715
Joined: 9/24/2007(UTC)
Location: Visalia, CA

Applause Given: 1,774
Applause Received: 418

Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post
Okay.. so we are going to allow freebie weeks against teams with inactive players?

I understand and respect the no changes concept.. but I think not dealing with the issue creates more of an issue than staying with the hard line.. either way though..


That sounds like a TERRIBLE idea to me. It's not really changing the rules but rather doing whatever is possible since certain people aren't keeping up their end of the bargain.

Free wins diminish the quality of the entire league significantly.

Also, for next year, it would be nice to have a injured reserve spot. Flea Flicker has a nice option for this and we use it in another league. It's nice.
Offline Pack93z  
#13 Posted : Friday, October 1, 2010 3:15:17 PM(UTC)
Pack93z

Rank: Hall of Famer

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Bronze: 2012

United States
Posts: 12,752
Joined: 3/16/2007(UTC)
Location: North Central Wisconsin

Applause Given: 381
Applause Received: 1,022

Well, looks like the two week inactive is suddenly active again.. immediate issue is resolved in the A league.
I think when there's enough will and aggression, there's no shortage of talent either.

UserPostedImage
Offline Zero2Cool  
#14 Posted : Friday, October 1, 2010 3:26:02 PM(UTC)
Zero2Cool

Rank: Legend

Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

United States
Posts: 25,674
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI

Applause Given: 1,846
Applause Received: 2,004

Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post
Okay.. so we are going to allow freebie weeks against teams with inactive players?

I understand and respect the no changes concept.. but I think not dealing with the issue creates more of an issue than staying with the hard line.. either way though..


That sounds like a TERRIBLE idea to me. It's not really changing the rules but rather doing whatever is possible since certain people aren't keeping up their end of the bargain.

Free wins diminish the quality of the entire league significantly.

Also, for next year, it would be nice to have a injured reserve spot. Flea Flicker has a nice option for this and we use it in another league. It's nice.



If I change things now, then that shows I fail on sticking to my word. If it's a unanimous vote for one aspect through both leagues, I'm okay with changing it up.

doddpower, that is something we'll have to discuss for next year and I do like the idea.






I'm really not intentionally trying to be obtuse about this, but there's little that can be done, in my opinion.

If someone played against a team that has an injured starter already, why should the rest of the league not have that fair chance to get the freebie too? This is why I think rules need to be established before the season starts.

If dhazer got to play a team that had an injured starter, then we boot dhazer's opponent because of inactivity, how's that fair to the rest? Why should the other teams not have a fair crack at fools?

UserPostedImage
Click here and find the LATEST Packers News!
Offline Zero2Cool  
#15 Posted : Friday, October 1, 2010 3:26:57 PM(UTC)
Zero2Cool

Rank: Legend

Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

United States
Posts: 25,674
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI

Applause Given: 1,846
Applause Received: 2,004

Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post
Well, looks like the two week inactive is suddenly active again.. immediate issue is resolved in the A league.



What do you suggest we do about it? Kick them from the league after 21 days of inactivity?

UserPostedImage
Click here and find the LATEST Packers News!
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
2 Pages12>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Recent Topics
7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DarkaneRules

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DarkaneRules

15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT

18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

19h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DarkaneRules

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Tezzy

31-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

31-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / mi_keys

31-Jul / Fantasy Sports Talk / pitt yinzer

31-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

30-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

30-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind


Tweeter

Copyright © 2006-2014 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.